Alternatives to Godot logo

Alternatives to Godot

Unreal Engine, MonoGame, Unity, three.js, and Ninject are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Godot.
167
211
+ 1
27

What is Godot and what are its top alternatives?

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.
Godot is a tool in the Game Development category of a tech stack.
Godot is an open source tool with GitHub stars and GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Godot's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Godot

  • Unreal Engine
    Unreal Engine

    It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game. ...

  • MonoGame
    MonoGame

    It is a free C# framework used by game developers to make games for multiple platforms and other systems. It is also used to make Windows and Windows Phone games run on other systems. ...

  • Unity
    Unity

    Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers. ...

  • three.js
    three.js

    It is a cross-browser JavaScript library and Application Programming Interface used to create and display animated 3D computer graphics in a web browser. ...

  • Ninject
    Ninject

    It is a lightning-fast, ultra-lightweight dependency injector for .NET applications. It helps you split your application into a collection of loosely-coupled, highly-cohesive pieces, and then glue them back together in a flexible manner. By using it to support your software's architecture, your code will become easier to write, reuse, test, and modify. ...

  • Phaser
    Phaser

    It is a free open source HTML5 game framework. It uses Pixi.js for WebGL and Canvas rendering across desktop and mobile web browsers. Games can be compiled to iOS and Android apps via 3rd party tools. ...

  • pygame
    pygame

    It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language. ...

  • Cocos2D-X
    Cocos2D-X

    Cocos2d-x is an open-source and cross-platform open source free 2D game engine for mobile game development known for its speed, stability, and ease of use ...

Godot alternatives & related posts

Unreal Engine logo

Unreal Engine

305
311
32
A suite of integrated tools for game developers
305
311
+ 1
32
PROS OF UNREAL ENGINE
  • 9
    C++
  • 6
    Blueprints
  • 5
    PBR
  • 4
    Suitable for any projects
  • 4
    Source Available
  • 3
    Convenient and modern UI
  • 1
    Most Popular Game engine
CONS OF UNREAL ENGINE
  • 6
    Heavy
  • 1
    A lot of "heaviness" myths around

related Unreal Engine posts

MonoGame logo

MonoGame

27
45
1
A free C# framework used by game developers
27
45
+ 1
1
PROS OF MONOGAME
  • 1
    Cross-platform
CONS OF MONOGAME
  • 1
    Can't working in vs mac 2019
  • 1
    No GUI

related MonoGame posts

Unity logo

Unity

1.6K
1.3K
72
Unity brings state-of-the-art, affordable multiplatform tools and services to developers of interactive content everywhere.
1.6K
1.3K
+ 1
72
PROS OF UNITY
  • 16
    Because it's a powerful engine, you can build anything
  • 14
    C# language
  • 11
    Very Popular
  • 7
    Easy to Use
  • 6
    He Has A Free VErsion
  • 6
    Cross Platform
  • 4
    Very Large Showcase
  • 4
    Good Choise
  • 4
    2nd Game Engine In The World
CONS OF UNITY
  • 4
    Hard to get started with
  • 4
    Clunky UI
  • 4
    Closed source
  • 3
    No consistency with updates
  • 3
    Requires to build a lot of tools
  • 2
    Gigantic by being 9gb (thats what setup says)

related Unity posts

Shared insights
on
BabylonJSBabylonJSthree.jsthree.jsUnityUnity

We already have an existing 3d interactive application for windows, mac, and iOS devices and have planned to move that app to the web for high availability to different types of users. I have been searching for different options for it. Our existing application is made in Unity so we prefer to work on unity webgl but it also has its drawbacks. Other than that we are also thinking to change the tech stack to three.js or BabylonJS due to their high compatibility with the web ecosystem. I want to know which engine/library/framework we should use for the development of our 3d web application. Also with unity webgl, we want to develop all UI parts in web technologies only and will use the unity3d for 3d part only.

Points that are very important to consider - 1. Memory optimization and allocation 2. Quality 3. Shaders 4. Materials 5. Lighting 6. Mesh editing, mesh creation at runtime 7. Ar 8. Vr 10. Support on different browsers including mobile browsers 11. Physics(gravity, collision, cloth simulation, etc.) 12. Initial load time 13. Speed and performance 14. Max vertices count. What happens when we load models exceeding max vertex count? 15. Development time 16. Learning curve (Unity3d we already working on) 17. Ease of use. What artists can do using any platform eg. in unity3d, artists can edit materials, set up lighting etc? 18. Future scope 19. Scalability 20. Integration with web ecosystem

See more
three.js logo

three.js

536
433
0
A JavaScript 3D library
536
433
+ 1
0
PROS OF THREE.JS
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF THREE.JS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related three.js posts

      Shared insights
      on
      BabylonJSBabylonJSthree.jsthree.jsUnityUnity

      We already have an existing 3d interactive application for windows, mac, and iOS devices and have planned to move that app to the web for high availability to different types of users. I have been searching for different options for it. Our existing application is made in Unity so we prefer to work on unity webgl but it also has its drawbacks. Other than that we are also thinking to change the tech stack to three.js or BabylonJS due to their high compatibility with the web ecosystem. I want to know which engine/library/framework we should use for the development of our 3d web application. Also with unity webgl, we want to develop all UI parts in web technologies only and will use the unity3d for 3d part only.

      Points that are very important to consider - 1. Memory optimization and allocation 2. Quality 3. Shaders 4. Materials 5. Lighting 6. Mesh editing, mesh creation at runtime 7. Ar 8. Vr 10. Support on different browsers including mobile browsers 11. Physics(gravity, collision, cloth simulation, etc.) 12. Initial load time 13. Speed and performance 14. Max vertices count. What happens when we load models exceeding max vertex count? 15. Development time 16. Learning curve (Unity3d we already working on) 17. Ease of use. What artists can do using any platform eg. in unity3d, artists can edit materials, set up lighting etc? 18. Future scope 19. Scalability 20. Integration with web ecosystem

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      WebGLWebGLthree.jsthree.js

      I want a advice on what to use as a beginner three.js or WebGL?

      See more
      Ninject logo

      Ninject

      343
      12
      0
      The ninja of .net dependency injectors
      343
      12
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF NINJECT
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF NINJECT
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Ninject posts

          Phaser logo

          Phaser

          125
          159
          0
          Desktop and Mobile HTML5 game framework
          125
          159
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF PHASER
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF PHASER
            • 3
              No GUI

            related Phaser posts

            pygame logo

            pygame

            76
            142
            4
            Open Source python programming language library for making multimedia applications
            76
            142
            + 1
            4
            PROS OF PYGAME
            • 2
              Easy to install
            • 1
              Simple
            • 1
              Lightweigt by only being 12 mb
            CONS OF PYGAME
            • 2
              Has only 2d
            • 1
              Slow

            related pygame posts

            Cocos2D-X logo

            Cocos2D-X

            62
            81
            0
            Open source game engine
            62
            81
            + 1
            0
            PROS OF COCOS2D-X
              Be the first to leave a pro
              CONS OF COCOS2D-X
              • 2
                Popular only in Asia
              • 2
                Based on Chinese
              • 1
                No Multiple Languages
              • 1
                Not Popular in itch.io and in Steam
              • 1
                Very poor system
              • 1
                No GUI
              • 1
                Bad Windows Performance

              related Cocos2D-X posts