Alternatives to Ghostlab logo

Alternatives to Ghostlab

BrowserStack, BrowserSync, CodeKit, Selenium, and Karma are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Ghostlab.
6
18
+ 1
0

What is Ghostlab and what are its top alternatives?

It is a Mac based app that allows you to test out your responsive design across a variety of devices and browsers
Ghostlab is a tool in the Browser Testing category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Ghostlab

  • BrowserStack
    BrowserStack

    BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real browsers and devices in a single cloud platform—and at scale. ...

  • BrowserSync
    BrowserSync

    BrowserSync makes your tweaking and testing faster by synchronising file changes and interactions across multiple devices. It’s wicked-fast and totally free. ...

  • CodeKit
    CodeKit

    Process Less, Sass, Stylus, Jade, Haml, Slim, CoffeeScript, Javascript, and Compass files automatically each time you save. Easily set options for each language. ...

  • Selenium
    Selenium

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...

  • Karma
    Karma

    Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like. ...

  • LambdaTest
    LambdaTest

    LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest. ...

  • LambdaTest
    LambdaTest

    LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest. ...

  • Sauce Labs
    Sauce Labs

    Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready. ...

Ghostlab alternatives & related posts

BrowserStack logo

BrowserStack

2.7K
2K
434
BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications
2.7K
2K
+ 1
434
PROS OF BROWSERSTACK
  • 131
    Multiple browsers
  • 71
    Ease of use
  • 59
    Real browsers
  • 40
    Ability to use it locally
  • 23
    Good price
  • 17
    Great web interface
  • 15
    IE support
  • 13
    Official mobile emulators
  • 12
    Cloud-based access
  • 11
    Instant access
  • 8
    Real mobile devices
  • 5
    Multiple Desktop OS
  • 5
    Selenium compatible
  • 4
    Screenshots
  • 4
    Can be used for Testing and E2E
  • 3
    Video of test runs
  • 3
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 2
    Webdriver compatible
  • 2
    Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing
  • 2
    Many browsers
  • 2
    Favourites
  • 1
    Free for Open Source
  • 1
    Cypress Compatible
CONS OF BROWSERSTACK
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions

related BrowserStack posts

Zarema Khalilova
Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 226.1K views

I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

See more
BrowserSync logo

BrowserSync

124
135
0
Reload all your browsers, every time you hit save
124
135
+ 1
0
PROS OF BROWSERSYNC
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF BROWSERSYNC
      Be the first to leave a con

      related BrowserSync posts

      CodeKit logo

      CodeKit

      67
      99
      28
      Mac app that compiles Less, Sass, Stylus, Jade, Haml, Javascript, and Markdown files automatically each time you save
      67
      99
      + 1
      28
      PROS OF CODEKIT
      • 8
        Instant setup for quick experiments
      • 8
        Easy to configure
      • 7
        Cross device live reloading
      • 5
        Any editor OK
      CONS OF CODEKIT
        Be the first to leave a con

        related CodeKit posts

        Selenium logo

        Selenium

        13.3K
        10.5K
        522
        Web Browser Automation
        13.3K
        10.5K
        + 1
        522
        PROS OF SELENIUM
        • 172
          Automates browsers
        • 154
          Testing
        • 101
          Essential tool for running test automation
        • 24
          Remote Control
        • 24
          Record-Playback
        • 8
          Data crawling
        • 7
          Supports end to end testing
        • 6
          Functional testing
        • 6
          Easy set up
        • 4
          The Most flexible monitoring system
        • 3
          End to End Testing
        • 3
          Easy to integrate with build tools
        • 2
          Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
        • 2
          Record and playback
        • 2
          Compatible with Python
        • 2
          Easy to scale
        • 2
          Integration Tests
        • 0
          Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework
        CONS OF SELENIUM
        • 8
          Flaky tests
        • 4
          Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
        • 1
          Update browser drivers

        related Selenium posts

        Kamil Kowalski
        Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 1.7M views

        When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

        See more
        Benjamin Poon
        QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 903.7K views

        For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

        With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

        See more
        Karma logo

        Karma

        2.4K
        585
        181
        Spectacular Test Runner for JavaScript
        2.4K
        585
        + 1
        181
        PROS OF KARMA
        • 61
          Test Runner
        • 35
          Open source
        • 27
          Continuous Integration
        • 22
          Great for running tests
        • 18
          Test on Real Devices
        • 11
          Backed by google
        • 5
          Easy Debugging
        • 2
          Remote Control
        CONS OF KARMA
        • 1
          Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
        • 1
          Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically

        related Karma posts

        Sai Chaitanya Mankala
        Tech Lead at KIOT Innovations · | 6 upvotes · 147.5K views

        Protractor or Cypress for ionic-angular?

        We have a huge ionic-angular app with almost 100 pages and 10+ injectables. There are no tests written yet. Before we start, we need some suggestions about the framework. Would you suggest Cypress or Angular's Protractor with Jasmine / Karma for a heavy ionic app with Angular?

        See more

        Switched from Jasmine with Karma that come setup by Angular CLI to use Jest instead, since Jasmine and Karma were very finicky in my setup and had to be reconfigured frequently to run tests properly.

        Jest was also easier to integrate into my workflow with Visual Studio Code.

        See more
        LambdaTest logo

        LambdaTest

        532
        178
        203
        LambdaTest is a continuous quality testing cloud platform that helps developers and testers ship code faster.
        532
        178
        + 1
        203
        PROS OF LAMBDATEST
        • 16
          Pocket friendly pricing
        • 13
          Good Performance
        • 12
          Integration with Bitbucket
        • 12
          Integration with Gitlab
        • 12
          Cross browser testing
        • 11
          Integration with Jira
        • 11
          Great support
        • 11
          Integration with GitHub
        • 10
          Integration with Slack
        • 10
          Clean UI and Easy to use
        • 10
          Integration with Trello
        • 10
          Integration with Asana
        • 8
          IE and Edge support
        • 8
          Pre-installed developer tools
        • 8
          Integration with Hive
        • 6
          Multiple Browsers
        • 6
          Local app testing
        • 5
          Integration with Teamwork
        • 5
          Integration with VSTS
        • 4
          Real time testing feature is flawless
        • 3
          Selenium automation
        • 3
          Faster Speed
        • 3
          Up-to-date Browser collection
        • 2
          24/7 Customer Chat Support
        • 2
          Robust Selenium Grid
        • 2
          Real devices
        CONS OF LAMBDATEST
          Be the first to leave a con

          related LambdaTest posts

          Sarah Elson
          Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 402.9K views

          @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

          See more
          Sarah Elson
          Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 2 upvotes · 103.9K views
          Shared insights
          on
          SeleniumSeleniumLambdaTestLambdaTest
          at
          Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

          Selenium LambdaTest

          See more
          LambdaTest logo

          LambdaTest

          532
          178
          203
          LambdaTest is a continuous quality testing cloud platform that helps developers and testers ship code faster.
          532
          178
          + 1
          203
          PROS OF LAMBDATEST
          • 16
            Pocket friendly pricing
          • 13
            Good Performance
          • 12
            Integration with Bitbucket
          • 12
            Integration with Gitlab
          • 12
            Cross browser testing
          • 11
            Integration with Jira
          • 11
            Great support
          • 11
            Integration with GitHub
          • 10
            Integration with Slack
          • 10
            Clean UI and Easy to use
          • 10
            Integration with Trello
          • 10
            Integration with Asana
          • 8
            IE and Edge support
          • 8
            Pre-installed developer tools
          • 8
            Integration with Hive
          • 6
            Multiple Browsers
          • 6
            Local app testing
          • 5
            Integration with Teamwork
          • 5
            Integration with VSTS
          • 4
            Real time testing feature is flawless
          • 3
            Selenium automation
          • 3
            Faster Speed
          • 3
            Up-to-date Browser collection
          • 2
            24/7 Customer Chat Support
          • 2
            Robust Selenium Grid
          • 2
            Real devices
          CONS OF LAMBDATEST
            Be the first to leave a con

            related LambdaTest posts

            Sarah Elson
            Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 402.9K views

            @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

            See more
            Sarah Elson
            Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 2 upvotes · 103.9K views
            Shared insights
            on
            SeleniumSeleniumLambdaTestLambdaTest
            at
            Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

            Selenium LambdaTest

            See more
            Sauce Labs logo

            Sauce Labs

            305
            425
            438
            Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.
            305
            425
            + 1
            438
            PROS OF SAUCE LABS
            • 60
              Selenium-compatible
            • 46
              Webdriver compatible
            • 35
              Video recordings of every test
            • 31
              Qa
            • 29
              Mobile support
            • 26
              Any programming language
            • 23
              Developer tools
            • 21
              Test local and firewalled servers
            • 20
              Jenkins integration
            • 18
              Pristine VMs
            • 17
              CI Compatible
            • 11
              Appium support
            • 9
              Parallel testing
            • 8
              Rapid environment preparation
            • 8
              Mobile device support
            • 7
              Easy testing on almost any device
            • 7
              Allows me to Focus more test automation rather than IT
            • 6
              Secure testing and easy setup
            • 5
              Easy setup with CI and fast automated tests
            • 5
              Quick support response
            • 4
              Fast and reliable to host the automated tests
            • 4
              Easy to setup and understand,
            • 3
              Easy setup and integration with Travis Ci
            • 3
              Maintained browser matrix
            • 3
              Easy onboarding, do not need to manager VMs/OS/Browsers
            • 2
              Efficient tool to verify product quality
            • 2
              Teamcity Integration and mobile testing win
            • 2
              Hany for platform testing
            • 2
              Great documentation
            • 2
              Generous free trial
            • 2
              Easy. Straightforward. Scalable
            • 2
              Great way to integrate test suite on cloud
            • 2
              Simplicity of Sauce-connect
            • 1
              Very Good, Quick, flexible Infrastructure Support
            • 1
              It's great for my QA work
            • 1
              Awesome tech support
            • 1
              Having this available for CI servers is fantastic
            • 1
              Amazing service to do cloud cross browser testing
            • 1
              Depth of integrations
            • 1
              Because of its cloud based support for appium
            • 1
              Easy setup, Works great with selenium.
            • 1
              QE support
            • 1
              Manuals are not very well versed for beginners
            • 1
              Secure testing
            • 1
              Cheaper than browserstack
            • 1
              Stable
            • 0
              Simple to set up and integrate so many browser configs
            CONS OF SAUCE LABS
            • 2
              Relatively slow
            • 2
              Expensive

            related Sauce Labs posts

            Shared insights
            on
            Sauce LabsSauce LabsSeleniumSelenium

            I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

            I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

            See more
            Zarema Khalilova
            Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 226.1K views

            I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

            See more