Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting  logo

Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting

LambdaTest, BrowserStack, TestComplete, JavaScript, and Git are the most popular alternatives and competitors to CrossBrowserTesting .
37
40
+ 1
0

What is CrossBrowserTesting and what are its top alternatives?

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud-based cross-browser testing platform that allows users to test their websites and web applications on different browsers and operating systems. Key features include real-time testing, automated testing, visual testing, and manual testing. However, some limitations of CrossBrowserTesting include limited integrations with third-party tools and higher pricing compared to some competitors.

  1. BrowserStack: BrowserStack offers a similar cross-browser testing solution with a wide range of browsers and devices to test on. It includes features like automated testing, live testing, and responsive testing. Pros include a large device and browser library, but cons may include higher pricing for some users.

  2. LambdaTest: LambdaTest is another cloud-based platform for cross-browser testing. It provides features such as automated testing, real-time testing, and responsive testing. Pros of LambdaTest include a user-friendly interface, while cons might be limitations in customization options.

  3. Sauce Labs: Sauce Labs is a cloud-based testing platform that offers cross-browser testing capabilities. It includes features like automated testing, analytics, and debugging tools. Pros of Sauce Labs include a robust infrastructure for testing, but cons may include higher pricing for some users.

  4. TestingBot: TestingBot is a cloud-based testing platform that allows users to perform cross-browser testing. It offers features such as automated testing, manual testing, and visual testing. Pros of TestingBot include a large selection of browsers and devices, while cons may include limited support for some frameworks.

  5. Ghost Inspector: Ghost Inspector is a testing automation tool that includes cross-browser testing capabilities. It offers features like automated testing, visual testing, and browser compatibility testing. Pros of Ghost Inspector include an easy-to-use interface, while cons might be fewer customization options compared to other tools.

  6. Applitools: Applitools is a visual testing tool that provides cross-browser testing capabilities. It offers features like AI-powered visual testing, automated testing, and responsive testing. Pros of Applitools include advanced visual testing capabilities, while cons may include higher pricing for some users.

  7. Browsera: Browsera is a website testing tool that focuses on cross-browser compatibility testing. It offers features like automated testing, visual testing, and compatibility reporting. Pros of Browsera include detailed compatibility reports, but cons may include limited integrations with third-party tools.

  8. Ranorex Studio: Ranorex Studio is a test automation tool that includes cross-browser testing capabilities. It provides features like automated testing, manual testing, and visual testing. Pros of Ranorex Studio include advanced automation features, while cons may include a steeper learning curve for beginners.

  9. SmartBear CrossBrowserTesting: SmartBear CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud-based testing platform that offers cross-browser testing solutions. It includes features like automated testing, live testing, and visual testing. Pros of SmartBear CrossBrowserTesting include integration with other SmartBear tools, but cons may include limited customization options.

  10. Eggplant: Eggplant is a digital automation intelligence tool that includes cross-browser testing capabilities. It offers features like AI-powered testing, automated testing, and visual testing. Pros of Eggplant include advanced AI capabilities for testing, while cons may include higher pricing for some users.

Top Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting

  • LambdaTest
    LambdaTest

    LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest. ...

  • BrowserStack
    BrowserStack

    BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. ...

  • TestComplete
    TestComplete

    It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Git
    Git

    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. ...

  • GitHub
    GitHub

    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • jQuery
    jQuery

    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML. ...

CrossBrowserTesting alternatives & related posts

LambdaTest logo

LambdaTest

538
198
204
LambdaTest is a continuous quality testing cloud platform that helps developers and testers ship code faster.
538
198
+ 1
204
PROS OF LAMBDATEST
  • 17
    Pocket friendly pricing
  • 13
    Good Performance
  • 12
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 12
    Integration with Bitbucket
  • 12
    Cross browser testing
  • 11
    Integration with Jira
  • 11
    Great support
  • 11
    Integration with GitHub
  • 10
    Integration with Trello
  • 10
    Clean UI and Easy to use
  • 10
    Integration with Slack
  • 10
    Integration with Asana
  • 8
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 8
    Integration with Hive
  • 8
    IE and Edge support
  • 6
    Local app testing
  • 6
    Multiple Browsers
  • 5
    Integration with Teamwork
  • 5
    Integration with VSTS
  • 4
    Real time testing feature is flawless
  • 3
    Selenium automation
  • 3
    Faster Speed
  • 3
    Up-to-date Browser collection
  • 2
    Robust Selenium Grid
  • 2
    Real devices
  • 2
    24/7 Customer Chat Support
CONS OF LAMBDATEST
  • 1
    Cluttered UI
  • 1
    Steep learning curve for new users
  • 1
    Limited device support

related LambdaTest posts

Sarah Elson
Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 757.4K views

@producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

See more
Sarah Elson
Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 2 upvotes · 127.5K views
Shared insights
on
SeleniumSeleniumLambdaTestLambdaTest
at
Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

Selenium LambdaTest

See more
BrowserStack logo

BrowserStack

2.7K
2K
499
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale, & optimize...
2.7K
2K
+ 1
499
PROS OF BROWSERSTACK
  • 134
    Multiple browsers
  • 75
    Ease of use
  • 64
    Real browsers
  • 43
    Ability to use it locally
  • 26
    Good price
  • 20
    Great web interface
  • 18
    IE support
  • 16
    Official mobile emulators
  • 14
    Instant access
  • 14
    Cloud-based access
  • 11
    Real mobile devices
  • 7
    Multiple Desktop OS
  • 7
    Selenium compatible
  • 7
    Screenshots
  • 6
    Can be used for Testing and E2E
  • 5
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 4
    Video of test runs
  • 3
    Many browsers
  • 3
    Favourites
  • 3
    Webdriver compatible
  • 3
    Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing
  • 2
    Free for Open Source
  • 2
    Unify and track test cases
  • 2
    Test automation dashboard
  • 2
    Test Management
  • 2
    Cross-browser testing
  • 2
    Cypress Compatible
  • 2
    Bi-directional Jira Sync
  • 1
    Speed is fast
  • 1
    Real devices
  • 0
    Visual testing and review
  • 0
    Test WCAG Compliance
  • 0
    Web accessibility
CONS OF BROWSERSTACK
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions

related BrowserStack posts

Tassanai Singprom

This is my stack in Application & Data

JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

My Utilities Tools

Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

My Devops Tools

Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

My Business Tools

Slack

See more
Zarema Khalilova
Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 293.5K views

I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

See more
TestComplete logo

TestComplete

35
57
0
The Easiest-to-Use Automated UI Testing Tool with Artificial Intelligence
35
57
+ 1
0
PROS OF TESTCOMPLETE
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF TESTCOMPLETE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related TestComplete posts

      JavaScript logo

      JavaScript

      353K
      268.6K
      8.1K
      Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
      353K
      268.6K
      + 1
      8.1K
      PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
      • 1.7K
        Can be used on frontend/backend
      • 1.5K
        It's everywhere
      • 1.2K
        Lots of great frameworks
      • 897
        Fast
      • 745
        Light weight
      • 425
        Flexible
      • 392
        You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
      • 286
        Non-blocking i/o
      • 237
        Ubiquitousness
      • 191
        Expressive
      • 55
        Extended functionality to web pages
      • 49
        Relatively easy language
      • 46
        Executed on the client side
      • 30
        Relatively fast to the end user
      • 25
        Pure Javascript
      • 21
        Functional programming
      • 15
        Async
      • 13
        Full-stack
      • 12
        Setup is easy
      • 12
        Future Language of The Web
      • 12
        Its everywhere
      • 11
        Because I love functions
      • 11
        JavaScript is the New PHP
      • 10
        Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
      • 9
        Expansive community
      • 9
        Everyone use it
      • 9
        Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
      • 9
        Easy
      • 8
        Most Popular Language in the World
      • 8
        Powerful
      • 8
        Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
      • 8
        For the good parts
      • 8
        No need to use PHP
      • 8
        Easy to hire developers
      • 7
        Agile, packages simple to use
      • 7
        Love-hate relationship
      • 7
        Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
      • 7
        Evolution of C
      • 7
        It's fun
      • 7
        Hard not to use
      • 7
        Versitile
      • 7
        Its fun and fast
      • 7
        Nice
      • 7
        Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
      • 7
        Supports lambdas and closures
      • 6
        It let's me use Babel & Typescript
      • 6
        Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
      • 6
        1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
      • 6
        Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
      • 6
        Easy to make something
      • 5
        Clojurescript
      • 5
        Promise relationship
      • 5
        Stockholm Syndrome
      • 5
        Function expressions are useful for callbacks
      • 5
        Scope manipulation
      • 5
        Everywhere
      • 5
        Client processing
      • 5
        What to add
      • 4
        Because it is so simple and lightweight
      • 4
        Only Programming language on browser
      • 1
        Test
      • 1
        Hard to learn
      • 1
        Test2
      • 1
        Not the best
      • 1
        Easy to understand
      • 1
        Subskill #4
      • 1
        Easy to learn
      • 0
        Hard 彤
      CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
      • 22
        A constant moving target, too much churn
      • 20
        Horribly inconsistent
      • 15
        Javascript is the New PHP
      • 9
        No ability to monitor memory utilitization
      • 8
        Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
      • 7
        Thinks strange results are better than errors
      • 6
        Can be ugly
      • 3
        No GitHub
      • 2
        Slow

      related JavaScript posts

      Zach Holman

      Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

      But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

      But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

      Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

      See more
      Conor Myhrvold
      Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 10.9M views

      How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

      Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

      Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

      https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

      (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

      Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

      See more
      Git logo

      Git

      292.1K
      175.1K
      6.6K
      Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
      292.1K
      175.1K
      + 1
      6.6K
      PROS OF GIT
      • 1.4K
        Distributed version control system
      • 1.1K
        Efficient branching and merging
      • 959
        Fast
      • 845
        Open source
      • 726
        Better than svn
      • 368
        Great command-line application
      • 306
        Simple
      • 291
        Free
      • 232
        Easy to use
      • 222
        Does not require server
      • 27
        Distributed
      • 22
        Small & Fast
      • 18
        Feature based workflow
      • 15
        Staging Area
      • 13
        Most wide-spread VSC
      • 11
        Role-based codelines
      • 11
        Disposable Experimentation
      • 7
        Frictionless Context Switching
      • 6
        Data Assurance
      • 5
        Efficient
      • 4
        Just awesome
      • 3
        Github integration
      • 3
        Easy branching and merging
      • 2
        Compatible
      • 2
        Flexible
      • 2
        Possible to lose history and commits
      • 1
        Rebase supported natively; reflog; access to plumbing
      • 1
        Light
      • 1
        Team Integration
      • 1
        Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
      • 1
        Easy
      • 1
        Flexible, easy, Safe, and fast
      • 1
        CLI is great, but the GUI tools are awesome
      • 1
        It's what you do
      • 0
        Phinx
      CONS OF GIT
      • 16
        Hard to learn
      • 11
        Inconsistent command line interface
      • 9
        Easy to lose uncommitted work
      • 7
        Worst documentation ever possibly made
      • 5
        Awful merge handling
      • 3
        Unexistent preventive security flows
      • 3
        Rebase hell
      • 2
        When --force is disabled, cannot rebase
      • 2
        Ironically even die-hard supporters screw up badly
      • 1
        Doesn't scale for big data

      related Git posts

      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 9.7M views

      Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

      • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
      • Respectively Git as revision control system
      • SourceTree as Git GUI
      • Visual Studio Code as IDE
      • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
      • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
      • SonarQube as quality gate
      • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
      • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
      • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
      • Heroku for deploying in test environments
      • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
      • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
      • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
      • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
      • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

      The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

      • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
      • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
      • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
      • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
      • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
      • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
      See more
      Tymoteusz Paul
      Devops guy at X20X Development LTD · | 23 upvotes · 8.7M views

      Often enough I have to explain my way of going about setting up a CI/CD pipeline with multiple deployment platforms. Since I am a bit tired of yapping the same every single time, I've decided to write it up and share with the world this way, and send people to read it instead ;). I will explain it on "live-example" of how the Rome got built, basing that current methodology exists only of readme.md and wishes of good luck (as it usually is ;)).

      It always starts with an app, whatever it may be and reading the readmes available while Vagrant and VirtualBox is installing and updating. Following that is the first hurdle to go over - convert all the instruction/scripts into Ansible playbook(s), and only stopping when doing a clear vagrant up or vagrant reload we will have a fully working environment. As our Vagrant environment is now functional, it's time to break it! This is the moment to look for how things can be done better (too rigid/too lose versioning? Sloppy environment setup?) and replace them with the right way to do stuff, one that won't bite us in the backside. This is the point, and the best opportunity, to upcycle the existing way of doing dev environment to produce a proper, production-grade product.

      I should probably digress here for a moment and explain why. I firmly believe that the way you deploy production is the same way you should deploy develop, shy of few debugging-friendly setting. This way you avoid the discrepancy between how production work vs how development works, which almost always causes major pains in the back of the neck, and with use of proper tools should mean no more work for the developers. That's why we start with Vagrant as developer boxes should be as easy as vagrant up, but the meat of our product lies in Ansible which will do meat of the work and can be applied to almost anything: AWS, bare metal, docker, LXC, in open net, behind vpn - you name it.

      We must also give proper consideration to monitoring and logging hoovering at this point. My generic answer here is to grab Elasticsearch, Kibana, and Logstash. While for different use cases there may be better solutions, this one is well battle-tested, performs reasonably and is very easy to scale both vertically (within some limits) and horizontally. Logstash rules are easy to write and are well supported in maintenance through Ansible, which as I've mentioned earlier, are at the very core of things, and creating triggers/reports and alerts based on Elastic and Kibana is generally a breeze, including some quite complex aggregations.

      If we are happy with the state of the Ansible it's time to move on and put all those roles and playbooks to work. Namely, we need something to manage our CI/CD pipelines. For me, the choice is obvious: TeamCity. It's modern, robust and unlike most of the light-weight alternatives, it's transparent. What I mean by that is that it doesn't tell you how to do things, doesn't limit your ways to deploy, or test, or package for that matter. Instead, it provides a developer-friendly and rich playground for your pipelines. You can do most the same with Jenkins, but it has a quite dated look and feel to it, while also missing some key functionality that must be brought in via plugins (like quality REST API which comes built-in with TeamCity). It also comes with all the common-handy plugins like Slack or Apache Maven integration.

      The exact flow between CI and CD varies too greatly from one application to another to describe, so I will outline a few rules that guide me in it: 1. Make build steps as small as possible. This way when something breaks, we know exactly where, without needing to dig and root around. 2. All security credentials besides development environment must be sources from individual Vault instances. Keys to those containers should exist only on the CI/CD box and accessible by a few people (the less the better). This is pretty self-explanatory, as anything besides dev may contain sensitive data and, at times, be public-facing. Because of that appropriate security must be present. TeamCity shines in this department with excellent secrets-management. 3. Every part of the build chain shall consume and produce artifacts. If it creates nothing, it likely shouldn't be its own build. This way if any issue shows up with any environment or version, all developer has to do it is grab appropriate artifacts to reproduce the issue locally. 4. Deployment builds should be directly tied to specific Git branches/tags. This enables much easier tracking of what caused an issue, including automated identifying and tagging the author (nothing like automated regression testing!).

      Speaking of deployments, I generally try to keep it simple but also with a close eye on the wallet. Because of that, I am more than happy with AWS or another cloud provider, but also constantly peeking at the loads and do we get the value of what we are paying for. Often enough the pattern of use is not constantly erratic, but rather has a firm baseline which could be migrated away from the cloud and into bare metal boxes. That is another part where this approach strongly triumphs over the common Docker and CircleCI setup, where you are very much tied in to use cloud providers and getting out is expensive. Here to embrace bare-metal hosting all you need is a help of some container-based self-hosting software, my personal preference is with Proxmox and LXC. Following that all you must write are ansible scripts to manage hardware of Proxmox, similar way as you do for Amazon EC2 (ansible supports both greatly) and you are good to go. One does not exclude another, quite the opposite, as they can live in great synergy and cut your costs dramatically (the heavier your base load, the bigger the savings) while providing production-grade resiliency.

      See more
      GitHub logo

      GitHub

      280.8K
      245.1K
      10.3K
      Powerful collaboration, review, and code management for open source and private development projects
      280.8K
      245.1K
      + 1
      10.3K
      PROS OF GITHUB
      • 1.8K
        Open source friendly
      • 1.5K
        Easy source control
      • 1.3K
        Nice UI
      • 1.1K
        Great for team collaboration
      • 867
        Easy setup
      • 504
        Issue tracker
      • 486
        Great community
      • 483
        Remote team collaboration
      • 451
        Great way to share
      • 442
        Pull request and features planning
      • 147
        Just works
      • 132
        Integrated in many tools
      • 121
        Free Public Repos
      • 116
        Github Gists
      • 112
        Github pages
      • 83
        Easy to find repos
      • 62
        Open source
      • 60
        It's free
      • 60
        Easy to find projects
      • 56
        Network effect
      • 49
        Extensive API
      • 43
        Organizations
      • 42
        Branching
      • 34
        Developer Profiles
      • 32
        Git Powered Wikis
      • 30
        Great for collaboration
      • 24
        It's fun
      • 23
        Clean interface and good integrations
      • 22
        Community SDK involvement
      • 20
        Learn from others source code
      • 16
        Because: Git
      • 14
        It integrates directly with Azure
      • 10
        Standard in Open Source collab
      • 10
        Newsfeed
      • 8
        It integrates directly with Hipchat
      • 8
        Fast
      • 8
        Beautiful user experience
      • 7
        Easy to discover new code libraries
      • 6
        Smooth integration
      • 6
        Cloud SCM
      • 6
        Nice API
      • 6
        Graphs
      • 6
        Integrations
      • 6
        It's awesome
      • 5
        Quick Onboarding
      • 5
        Reliable
      • 5
        Remarkable uptime
      • 5
        CI Integration
      • 5
        Hands down best online Git service available
      • 4
        Uses GIT
      • 4
        Version Control
      • 4
        Simple but powerful
      • 4
        Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
      • 4
        Free HTML hosting
      • 4
        Security options
      • 4
        Loved by developers
      • 4
        Easy to use and collaborate with others
      • 3
        Ci
      • 3
        IAM
      • 3
        Nice to use
      • 3
        Easy deployment via SSH
      • 2
        Easy to use
      • 2
        Leads the copycats
      • 2
        All in one development service
      • 2
        Free private repos
      • 2
        Free HTML hostings
      • 2
        Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
      • 2
        Beautiful
      • 2
        Easy source control and everything is backed up
      • 2
        IAM integration
      • 2
        Very Easy to Use
      • 2
        Good tools support
      • 2
        Issues tracker
      • 2
        Never dethroned
      • 2
        Self Hosted
      • 1
        Dasf
      • 1
        Profound
      CONS OF GITHUB
      • 54
        Owned by micrcosoft
      • 38
        Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
      • 15
        Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
      • 10
        API scoping could be better
      • 9
        Only 3 collaborators for private repos
      • 4
        Limited featureset for issue management
      • 3
        Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens
      • 2
        GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
      • 1
        No multilingual interface
      • 1
        Takes a long time to commit
      • 1
        Expensive

      related GitHub posts

      Johnny Bell

      I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

      I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

      I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

      Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

      Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

      With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

      If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

      See more

      Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

      Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

      Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

      Check out the GitHub repo attached

      See more
      Python logo

      Python

      240.9K
      196.5K
      6.9K
      A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
      240.9K
      196.5K
      + 1
      6.9K
      PROS OF PYTHON
      • 1.2K
        Great libraries
      • 961
        Readable code
      • 846
        Beautiful code
      • 787
        Rapid development
      • 689
        Large community
      • 435
        Open source
      • 393
        Elegant
      • 282
        Great community
      • 272
        Object oriented
      • 220
        Dynamic typing
      • 77
        Great standard library
      • 59
        Very fast
      • 55
        Functional programming
      • 49
        Easy to learn
      • 45
        Scientific computing
      • 35
        Great documentation
      • 29
        Productivity
      • 28
        Easy to read
      • 28
        Matlab alternative
      • 23
        Simple is better than complex
      • 20
        It's the way I think
      • 19
        Imperative
      • 18
        Free
      • 18
        Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
      • 17
        Powerfull language
      • 17
        Machine learning support
      • 16
        Fast and simple
      • 14
        Scripting
      • 12
        Explicit is better than implicit
      • 11
        Ease of development
      • 10
        Clear and easy and powerfull
      • 9
        Unlimited power
      • 8
        It's lean and fun to code
      • 8
        Import antigravity
      • 7
        Print "life is short, use python"
      • 7
        Python has great libraries for data processing
      • 6
        Although practicality beats purity
      • 6
        Flat is better than nested
      • 6
        Great for tooling
      • 6
        Rapid Prototyping
      • 6
        Readability counts
      • 6
        High Documented language
      • 6
        I love snakes
      • 6
        Fast coding and good for competitions
      • 6
        There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
      • 6
        Now is better than never
      • 5
        Great for analytics
      • 5
        Lists, tuples, dictionaries
      • 4
        Easy to learn and use
      • 4
        Simple and easy to learn
      • 4
        Easy to setup and run smooth
      • 4
        Web scraping
      • 4
        CG industry needs
      • 4
        Socially engaged community
      • 4
        Complex is better than complicated
      • 4
        Multiple Inheritence
      • 4
        Beautiful is better than ugly
      • 4
        Plotting
      • 3
        If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
      • 3
        Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
      • 3
        Pip install everything
      • 3
        List comprehensions
      • 3
        No cruft
      • 3
        Generators
      • 3
        Import this
      • 3
        It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
      • 3
        Many types of collections
      • 3
        If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
      • 2
        Batteries included
      • 2
        Should START with this but not STICK with This
      • 2
        Powerful language for AI
      • 2
        Can understand easily who are new to programming
      • 2
        Flexible and easy
      • 2
        Good for hacking
      • 2
        A-to-Z
      • 2
        Because of Netflix
      • 2
        Only one way to do it
      • 2
        Better outcome
      • 1
        Sexy af
      • 1
        Slow
      • 1
        Securit
      • 0
        Ni
      • 0
        Powerful
      CONS OF PYTHON
      • 53
        Still divided between python 2 and python 3
      • 28
        Performance impact
      • 26
        Poor syntax for anonymous functions
      • 22
        GIL
      • 19
        Package management is a mess
      • 14
        Too imperative-oriented
      • 12
        Hard to understand
      • 12
        Dynamic typing
      • 12
        Very slow
      • 8
        Indentations matter a lot
      • 8
        Not everything is expression
      • 7
        Incredibly slow
      • 7
        Explicit self parameter in methods
      • 6
        Requires C functions for dynamic modules
      • 6
        Poor DSL capabilities
      • 6
        No anonymous functions
      • 5
        Fake object-oriented programming
      • 5
        Threading
      • 5
        The "lisp style" whitespaces
      • 5
        Official documentation is unclear.
      • 5
        Hard to obfuscate
      • 5
        Circular import
      • 4
        Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
      • 4
        The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
      • 4
        Not suitable for autocomplete
      • 2
        Meta classes
      • 1
        Training wheels (forced indentation)

      related Python posts

      Conor Myhrvold
      Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 10.9M views

      How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

      Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

      Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

      https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

      (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

      Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

      See more
      Nick Parsons
      Building cool things on the internet 🛠️ at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 3.9M views

      Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

      We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

      We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

      Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

      #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

      See more
      jQuery logo

      jQuery

      190.5K
      67.1K
      6.6K
      The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.
      190.5K
      67.1K
      + 1
      6.6K
      PROS OF JQUERY
      • 1.3K
        Cross-browser
      • 957
        Dom manipulation
      • 809
        Power
      • 660
        Open source
      • 610
        Plugins
      • 459
        Easy
      • 395
        Popular
      • 350
        Feature-rich
      • 281
        Html5
      • 227
        Light weight
      • 93
        Simple
      • 84
        Great community
      • 79
        CSS3 Compliant
      • 69
        Mobile friendly
      • 67
        Fast
      • 43
        Intuitive
      • 42
        Swiss Army knife for webdev
      • 35
        Huge Community
      • 11
        Easy to learn
      • 4
        Clean code
      • 3
        Because of Ajax request :)
      • 2
        Powerful
      • 2
        Nice
      • 2
        Just awesome
      • 2
        Used everywhere
      • 1
        Improves productivity
      • 1
        Javascript
      • 1
        Easy Setup
      • 1
        Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
      • 1
        It Just Works
      • 1
        Industry acceptance
      • 1
        Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
      • 1
        Widely Used
      • 1
        I love jQuery
      CONS OF JQUERY
      • 6
        Large size
      • 5
        Sometimes inconsistent API
      • 5
        Encourages DOM as primary data source
      • 2
        Live events is overly complex feature

      related jQuery posts

      Kir Shatrov
      Engineering Lead at Shopify · | 22 upvotes · 2M views

      The client-side stack of Shopify Admin has been a long journey. It started with HTML templates, jQuery and Prototype. We moved to Batman.js, our in-house Single-Page-Application framework (SPA), in 2013. Then, we re-evaluated our approach and moved back to statically rendered HTML and vanilla JavaScript. As the front-end ecosystem matured, we felt that it was time to rethink our approach again. Last year, we started working on moving Shopify Admin to React and TypeScript.

      Many things have changed since the days of jQuery and Batman. JavaScript execution is much faster. We can easily render our apps on the server to do less work on the client, and the resources and tooling for developers are substantially better with React than we ever had with Batman.

      #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

      See more
      Ganesa Vijayakumar
      Full Stack Coder | Technical Lead · | 19 upvotes · 4.8M views

      I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

      I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

      As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

      UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

      Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

      Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

      Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

      Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

      Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

      Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

      Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

      Thanks, Ganesa

      See more