Alternatives to Cocos2D-X logo

Alternatives to Cocos2D-X

Godot, libGDX, Corona SDK, MonoGame, and JavaScript are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Cocos2D-X.
63
84
+ 1
0

What is Cocos2D-X and what are its top alternatives?

Cocos2D-X is a popular open-source game development framework that supports multiple platforms such as iOS, Android, and Windows. It provides a rich set of features including a physics engine, sprite animations, and audio support. However, one of its limitations is the steep learning curve for beginners due to its complex architecture.

  1. Unity: Unity is a widely used game engine that offers a user-friendly environment for creating 2D and 3D games. Key features include a powerful graphics engine, cross-platform support, and an extensive asset store. Pros: Easy to use, strong community support. Cons: License fee required for commercial use.
  2. Unreal Engine: Unreal Engine is another popular game development tool known for its high-quality graphics and visual effects. It provides advanced rendering capabilities, multiplayer support, and a robust editor. Pros: Stunning visuals, free for personal use. Cons: Steeper learning curve compared to Cocos2D-X.
  3. Godot Engine: Godot Engine is an open-source game engine that offers a wide range of features including a visual editor, scripting language, and support for 2D and 3D games. Pros: Free and open-source, lightweight. Cons: Limited documentation compared to Cocos2D-X.
  4. Phaser: Phaser is a JavaScript game framework for creating web-based games. It provides features like sprite animations, input handling, and physics simulations. Pros: Easy to get started, great for web games. Cons: Limited platform support compared to Cocos2D-X.
  5. GameMaker Studio: GameMaker Studio is a game development tool that offers a drag-and-drop interface along with a scripting language for creating games. Key features include cross-platform support, visual effects, and a large user community. Pros: User-friendly interface, good for rapid prototyping. Cons: Limited compared to Cocos2D-X for complex games.
  6. Construct: Construct is a no-code game development platform that allows users to create games without programming knowledge. It offers features like visual event system, asset store, and support for multiple platforms. Pros: No coding required, easy to use. Cons: Limited flexibility compared to Cocos2D-X.
  7. LibGDX: LibGDX is a cross-platform game development framework for Java developers. It provides tools for creating 2D and 3D games, handling input, and deploying games to various platforms. Pros: Open-source, Java-based. Cons: Less beginner-friendly compared to Cocos2D-X.
  8. Defold: Defold is a game engine that offers a lightweight and efficient platform for creating 2D games. It features a visual editor, scripting language, and support for live updates. Pros: Lightweight, good for mobile games. Cons: Limited compared to Cocos2D-X for complex projects.
  9. HaxeFlixel: HaxeFlixel is an open-source game development framework built on the Haxe programming language. It provides features like entity-component system, tilemaps, and cross-platform support. Pros: Open-source, versatile. Cons: Learning curve for Haxe language.
  10. Solar2D: Solar2D, formerly known as Corona SDK, is a cross-platform game development framework that uses Lua scripting language. It offers features like real-time updates, in-app purchases, and plugins support. Pros: Free and open-source, good for 2D games. Cons: Not as feature-rich as Cocos2D-X.

Top Alternatives to Cocos2D-X

  • Godot
    Godot

    It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world. ...

  • libGDX
    libGDX

    The framework provides an environment for rapid prototyping and fast iterations. Instead of deploying to Android/iOS/Javascript after each code change, you can run and debug your game on the desktop, natively. Desktop JVM features like code hotswapping reduce your iteration times considerably. ...

  • Corona SDK
    Corona SDK

    It is a cross-platform framework ideal for rapidly creating apps and games for mobile devices and desktop systems. It builds rich mobile apps for iOS, Android, Kindle and Nook. Build high quality mobile apps in a fraction of the time. ...

  • MonoGame
    MonoGame

    It is a free C# framework used by game developers to make games for multiple platforms and other systems. It is also used to make Windows and Windows Phone games run on other systems. ...

  • Unity
    Unity

    Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers. ...

  • three.js
    three.js

    It is a cross-browser JavaScript library and Application Programming Interface used to create and display animated 3D computer graphics in a web browser. ...

  • Unreal Engine
    Unreal Engine

    It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game. ...

  • Phaser
    Phaser

    It is a free open source HTML5 game framework. It uses Pixi.js for WebGL and Canvas rendering across desktop and mobile web browsers. Games can be compiled to iOS and Android apps via 3rd party tools. ...

Cocos2D-X alternatives & related posts

Godot logo

Godot

204
255
39
Free and open source 2D and 3D game engine
204
255
+ 1
39
PROS OF GODOT
  • 11
    Open source
  • 6
    Easy to port
  • 5
    Supports both C++, C# and GDScript
  • 5
    Cross-Platform
  • 5
    Simple
  • 4
    Avaible on Steam For Free
  • 3
    GDScript is Based On Python
CONS OF GODOT
  • 1
    Harder to learn
  • 1
    Performance in 3D
  • 1
    Need opengl 2.1 / 3.3
  • 1
    Somewhat poor 3D performance and lacks automatic LODs

related Godot posts

libGDX logo

libGDX

45
60
3
A Java game development framework that provides a unified API that works across all supported platforms
45
60
+ 1
3
PROS OF LIBGDX
  • 1
    Knows exactly what happening
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Fully control
CONS OF LIBGDX
  • 1
    Full access to OS
  • 1
    No GUI

related libGDX posts

Corona SDK logo

Corona SDK

17
37
5
Cross-platform development platform for 2D apps and games
17
37
+ 1
5
PROS OF CORONA SDK
  • 3
    Also potentially build for OS Apple
  • 2
    Lua code better than java code
CONS OF CORONA SDK
  • 4
    Not Very popular
  • 2
    Very Poor System

related Corona SDK posts

MonoGame logo

MonoGame

32
51
1
A free C# framework used by game developers
32
51
+ 1
1
PROS OF MONOGAME
  • 1
    Cross-platform
CONS OF MONOGAME
  • 1
    Can't working in vs mac 2019
  • 1
    No GUI

related MonoGame posts

Unity logo

Unity

1.6K
1.4K
73
Unity brings state-of-the-art, affordable multiplatform tools and services to developers of interactive content everywhere.
1.6K
1.4K
+ 1
73
PROS OF UNITY
  • 16
    Because it's a powerful engine, you can build anything
  • 14
    C# language
  • 11
    Very Popular
  • 7
    Easy to Use
  • 6
    He Has A Free VErsion
  • 6
    Cross Platform
  • 5
    2nd Game Engine In The World
  • 4
    Good Choise
  • 4
    Very Large Showcase
CONS OF UNITY
  • 4
    Hard to get started with
  • 4
    Clunky UI
  • 4
    Closed source
  • 3
    No consistency with updates
  • 3
    Requires to build a lot of tools
  • 2
    Gigantic by being 9gb (thats what setup says)

related Unity posts

Shared insights
on
BabylonJSBabylonJSthree.jsthree.jsUnityUnity

We already have an existing 3d interactive application for windows, mac, and iOS devices and have planned to move that app to the web for high availability to different types of users. I have been searching for different options for it. Our existing application is made in Unity so we prefer to work on unity webgl but it also has its drawbacks. Other than that we are also thinking to change the tech stack to three.js or BabylonJS due to their high compatibility with the web ecosystem. I want to know which engine/library/framework we should use for the development of our 3d web application. Also with unity webgl, we want to develop all UI parts in web technologies only and will use the unity3d for 3d part only.

Points that are very important to consider - 1. Memory optimization and allocation 2. Quality 3. Shaders 4. Materials 5. Lighting 6. Mesh editing, mesh creation at runtime 7. Ar 8. Vr 10. Support on different browsers including mobile browsers 11. Physics(gravity, collision, cloth simulation, etc.) 12. Initial load time 13. Speed and performance 14. Max vertices count. What happens when we load models exceeding max vertex count? 15. Development time 16. Learning curve (Unity3d we already working on) 17. Ease of use. What artists can do using any platform eg. in unity3d, artists can edit materials, set up lighting etc? 18. Future scope 19. Scalability 20. Integration with web ecosystem

See more
three.js logo

three.js

717
515
0
A JavaScript 3D library
717
515
+ 1
0
PROS OF THREE.JS
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF THREE.JS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related three.js posts

      Shared insights
      on
      BabylonJSBabylonJSthree.jsthree.jsUnityUnity

      We already have an existing 3d interactive application for windows, mac, and iOS devices and have planned to move that app to the web for high availability to different types of users. I have been searching for different options for it. Our existing application is made in Unity so we prefer to work on unity webgl but it also has its drawbacks. Other than that we are also thinking to change the tech stack to three.js or BabylonJS due to their high compatibility with the web ecosystem. I want to know which engine/library/framework we should use for the development of our 3d web application. Also with unity webgl, we want to develop all UI parts in web technologies only and will use the unity3d for 3d part only.

      Points that are very important to consider - 1. Memory optimization and allocation 2. Quality 3. Shaders 4. Materials 5. Lighting 6. Mesh editing, mesh creation at runtime 7. Ar 8. Vr 10. Support on different browsers including mobile browsers 11. Physics(gravity, collision, cloth simulation, etc.) 12. Initial load time 13. Speed and performance 14. Max vertices count. What happens when we load models exceeding max vertex count? 15. Development time 16. Learning curve (Unity3d we already working on) 17. Ease of use. What artists can do using any platform eg. in unity3d, artists can edit materials, set up lighting etc? 18. Future scope 19. Scalability 20. Integration with web ecosystem

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      WebGLWebGLthree.jsthree.js

      I want a advice on what to use as a beginner three.js or WebGL?

      See more
      Unreal Engine logo

      Unreal Engine

      359
      371
      33
      A suite of integrated tools for game developers
      359
      371
      + 1
      33
      PROS OF UNREAL ENGINE
      • 10
        C++
      • 6
        Blueprints
      • 5
        PBR
      • 4
        Suitable for any projects
      • 4
        Source Available
      • 3
        Convenient and modern UI
      • 1
        Most Popular Game engine
      CONS OF UNREAL ENGINE
      • 6
        Heavy
      • 1
        A lot of "heaviness" myths around

      related Unreal Engine posts

      Phaser logo

      Phaser

      130
      171
      4
      Desktop and Mobile HTML5 game framework
      130
      171
      + 1
      4
      PROS OF PHASER
      • 1
        Compile to iOS, Android and native apps
      • 1
        JavaScript or TypeScript
      • 1
        WebGL and Canvas rendering
      • 1
        Open Source
      CONS OF PHASER
      • 3
        No GUI

      related Phaser posts