Alternatives to Cloudera Enterprise logo

Alternatives to Cloudera Enterprise

Google BigQuery, Amazon Redshift, Snowflake, Amazon EMR, and Stitch are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Cloudera Enterprise.
123
168
+ 1
2

What is Cloudera Enterprise and what are its top alternatives?

Cloudera Enterprise is a comprehensive data management and analytics platform that enables organizations to store, process, and analyze large volumes of data. Its key features include Hadoop distribution, machine learning capabilities, data warehousing, and real-time analytics. However, some limitations of Cloudera Enterprise include high costs, complex setup and maintenance, and potential scalability issues.

  1. Hortonworks Data Platform: Hortonworks Data Platform is an open-source data management platform that offers Hadoop distribution, streaming analytics, data governance, and security features. Pros include open-source flexibility and a strong developer community, while cons include potential complexity in deployment.
  2. MapR: MapR provides a converged data platform that combines Hadoop, Spark, and other big data tools for analytics and AI/ML use cases. Key features include global event streaming and object storage, but cons may include a more closed-source approach compared to Cloudera.
  3. Databricks: Databricks offers a unified analytics platform built on top of Apache Spark for data engineering, machine learning, and data analytics. Pros include collaborative notebooks and tight integration with Spark, while cons may involve additional costs for advanced features.
  4. Qubole: Qubole is a cloud-native data platform that simplifies big data processing on platforms like Hadoop, Spark, and Presto. Key features include auto-scaling and workload-aware optimization, but potential drawbacks might include limited support for on-premise deployments.
  5. Amazon EMR: Amazon EMR is a cloud-based big data platform that offers managed Hadoop, Spark, and other frameworks for processing and analyzing data at scale. Pros include seamless integration with other AWS services, but cons could involve increased costs for data transfer and storage.
  6. Snowflake: Snowflake is a cloud-based data platform that specializes in data warehousing and analytics with features like automatic scaling and multi-cluster architecture. Pros include easy scalability and support for diverse data types, while cons may include potential costs for high data volume usage.
  7. IBM BigInsights: IBM BigInsights is an Hadoop-based platform that offers tools for data processing, machine learning, and analytics on-premises or on the cloud. Key features include SQL-based querying and integration with IBM Watson services, but potential limitations could involve complexity in setup and maintenance.
  8. Google Cloud Dataproc: Google Cloud Dataproc is a managed Spark and Hadoop service on Google Cloud Platform that allows users to run big data and machine learning jobs. Pros include easy integration with other GCP services, while cons might include potential costs for data processing and storage.
  9. Microsoft Azure HDInsight: Azure HDInsight is a cloud-based big data platform that provides managed Spark, Hadoop, and other popular big data frameworks. Key features include security and compliance certifications, but cons could involve higher costs compared to open-source alternatives.
  10. Couchbase: Couchbase is a NoSQL database platform that combines the flexibility of JSON documents with the performance of key-value stores for scalable data management. Pros include high performance and flexible data modeling, but cons may include limited support for advanced analytics features compared to Cloudera.

Top Alternatives to Cloudera Enterprise

  • Google BigQuery
    Google BigQuery

    Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python. ...

  • Amazon Redshift
    Amazon Redshift

    It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions. ...

  • Snowflake
    Snowflake

    Snowflake eliminates the administration and management demands of traditional data warehouses and big data platforms. Snowflake is a true data warehouse as a service running on Amazon Web Services (AWS)—no infrastructure to manage and no knobs to turn. ...

  • Amazon EMR
    Amazon EMR

    It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics. ...

  • Stitch
    Stitch

    Stitch is a simple, powerful ETL service built for software developers. Stitch evolved out of RJMetrics, a widely used business intelligence platform. When RJMetrics was acquired by Magento in 2016, Stitch was launched as its own company. ...

  • Dremio
    Dremio

    Dremio—the data lake engine, operationalizes your data lake storage and speeds your analytics processes with a high-performance and high-efficiency query engine while also democratizing data access for data scientists and analysts. ...

  • Fivetran
    Fivetran

    It helps you centralize data from disparate sources which you can manage directly from your browser. We extract your data and load it into your data destination. ...

  • Azure Synapse
    Azure Synapse

    It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs. ...

Cloudera Enterprise alternatives & related posts

Google BigQuery logo

Google BigQuery

1.6K
1.5K
152
Analyze terabytes of data in seconds
1.6K
1.5K
+ 1
152
PROS OF GOOGLE BIGQUERY
  • 28
    High Performance
  • 25
    Easy to use
  • 22
    Fully managed service
  • 19
    Cheap Pricing
  • 16
    Process hundreds of GB in seconds
  • 12
    Big Data
  • 11
    Full table scans in seconds, no indexes needed
  • 8
    Always on, no per-hour costs
  • 6
    Good combination with fluentd
  • 4
    Machine learning
  • 1
    Easy to manage
  • 0
    Easy to learn
CONS OF GOOGLE BIGQUERY
  • 1
    You can't unit test changes in BQ data

related Google BigQuery posts

Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

Check out the GitHub repo attached

See more
Tim Specht
‎Co-Founder and CTO at Dubsmash · | 14 upvotes · 938.7K views

In order to accurately measure & track user behaviour on our platform we moved over quickly from the initial solution using Google Analytics to a custom-built one due to resource & pricing concerns we had.

While this does sound complicated, it’s as easy as clients sending JSON blobs of events to Amazon Kinesis from where we use AWS Lambda & Amazon SQS to batch and process incoming events and then ingest them into Google BigQuery. Once events are stored in BigQuery (which usually only takes a second from the time the client sends the data until it’s available), we can use almost-standard-SQL to simply query for data while Google makes sure that, even with terabytes of data being scanned, query times stay in the range of seconds rather than hours. Before ingesting their data into the pipeline, our mobile clients are aggregating events internally and, once a certain threshold is reached or the app is going to the background, sending the events as a JSON blob into the stream.

In the past we had workers running that continuously read from the stream and would validate and post-process the data and then enqueue them for other workers to write them to BigQuery. We went ahead and implemented the Lambda-based approach in such a way that Lambda functions would automatically be triggered for incoming records, pre-aggregate events, and write them back to SQS, from which we then read them, and persist the events to BigQuery. While this approach had a couple of bumps on the road, like re-triggering functions asynchronously to keep up with the stream and proper batch sizes, we finally managed to get it running in a reliable way and are very happy with this solution today.

#ServerlessTaskProcessing #GeneralAnalytics #RealTimeDataProcessing #BigDataAsAService

See more
Amazon Redshift logo

Amazon Redshift

1.5K
1.4K
108
Fast, fully managed, petabyte-scale data warehouse service
1.5K
1.4K
+ 1
108
PROS OF AMAZON REDSHIFT
  • 41
    Data Warehousing
  • 27
    Scalable
  • 17
    SQL
  • 14
    Backed by Amazon
  • 5
    Encryption
  • 1
    Cheap and reliable
  • 1
    Isolation
  • 1
    Best Cloud DW Performance
  • 1
    Fast columnar storage
CONS OF AMAZON REDSHIFT
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Amazon Redshift posts

    Julien DeFrance
    Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.1M views

    Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

    I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

    For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

    Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

    Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

    Future improvements / technology decisions included:

    Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

    As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

    One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

    See more
    Ankit Sobti

    Looker , Stitch , Amazon Redshift , dbt

    We recently moved our Data Analytics and Business Intelligence tooling to Looker . It's already helping us create a solid process for reusable SQL-based data modeling, with consistent definitions across the entire organizations. Looker allows us to collaboratively build these version-controlled models and push the limits of what we've traditionally been able to accomplish with analytics with a lean team.

    For Data Engineering, we're in the process of moving from maintaining our own ETL pipelines on AWS to a managed ELT system on Stitch. We're also evaluating the command line tool, dbt to manage data transformations. Our hope is that Stitch + dbt will streamline the ELT bit, allowing us to focus our energies on analyzing data, rather than managing it.

    See more
    Snowflake logo

    Snowflake

    1.1K
    1.2K
    27
    The data warehouse built for the cloud
    1.1K
    1.2K
    + 1
    27
    PROS OF SNOWFLAKE
    • 7
      Public and Private Data Sharing
    • 4
      Multicloud
    • 4
      Good Performance
    • 4
      User Friendly
    • 3
      Great Documentation
    • 2
      Serverless
    • 1
      Economical
    • 1
      Usage based billing
    • 1
      Innovative
    CONS OF SNOWFLAKE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Snowflake posts

      I'm wondering if any Cloud Firestore users might be open to sharing some input and challenges encountered when trying to create a low-cost, low-latency data pipeline to their Analytics warehouse (e.g. Google BigQuery, Snowflake, etc...)

      I'm working with a platform by the name of Estuary.dev, an ETL/ELT and we are conducting some research on the pain points here to see if there are drawbacks of the Firestore->BQ extension and/or if users are seeking easy ways for getting nosql->fine-grained tabular data

      Please feel free to drop some knowledge/wish list stuff on me for a better pipeline here!

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      Google BigQueryGoogle BigQuerySnowflakeSnowflake

      I use Google BigQuery because it makes is super easy to query and store data for analytics workloads. If you're using GCP, you're likely using BigQuery. However, running data viz tools directly connected to BigQuery will run pretty slow. They recently announced BI Engine which will hopefully compete well against big players like Snowflake when it comes to concurrency.

      What's nice too is that it has SQL-based ML tools, and it has great GIS support!

      See more
      Amazon EMR logo

      Amazon EMR

      541
      681
      54
      Distribute your data and processing across a Amazon EC2 instances using Hadoop
      541
      681
      + 1
      54
      PROS OF AMAZON EMR
      • 15
        On demand processing power
      • 12
        Don't need to maintain Hadoop Cluster yourself
      • 7
        Hadoop Tools
      • 6
        Elastic
      • 4
        Backed by Amazon
      • 3
        Flexible
      • 3
        Economic - pay as you go, easy to use CLI and SDKs
      • 2
        Don't need a dedicated Ops group
      • 1
        Massive data handling
      • 1
        Great support
      CONS OF AMAZON EMR
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Amazon EMR posts

        Stitch logo

        Stitch

        146
        150
        12
        All your data. In your data warehouse. In minutes.
        146
        150
        + 1
        12
        PROS OF STITCH
        • 8
          3 minutes to set up
        • 4
          Super simple, great support
        CONS OF STITCH
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Stitch posts

          Ankit Sobti

          Looker , Stitch , Amazon Redshift , dbt

          We recently moved our Data Analytics and Business Intelligence tooling to Looker . It's already helping us create a solid process for reusable SQL-based data modeling, with consistent definitions across the entire organizations. Looker allows us to collaboratively build these version-controlled models and push the limits of what we've traditionally been able to accomplish with analytics with a lean team.

          For Data Engineering, we're in the process of moving from maintaining our own ETL pipelines on AWS to a managed ELT system on Stitch. We're also evaluating the command line tool, dbt to manage data transformations. Our hope is that Stitch + dbt will streamline the ELT bit, allowing us to focus our energies on analyzing data, rather than managing it.

          See more
          Cyril Duchon-Doris

          Hello, For security and strategic reasons, we are migrating our apps from AWS/Google to a cloud provider with more security certifications and fewer functionalities, named Outscale. So far we have been using Google BigQuery as our data warehouse with ELT workflows (using Stitch and dbt ) and we need to migrate our data ecosystem to this new cloud provider.

          We are setting up a Kubernetes cluster in our new cloud provider for our apps. Regarding the data warehouse, it's not clear if there are advantages/inconvenients about setting it up on kubernetes (apart from having to create node groups and tolerations with more ram/cpu). Also, we are not sure what's the best Open source or on-premise tool to use. The main requirement is that data must remain in the secure cluster, and no external entity (especially US) can have access to it. We have a dev cluster/environment and a production cluster/environment on this cloud.

          Regarding the actual DWH usage - Today we have ~1.5TB in BigQuery in production. We're going to run our initial rests with ~50-100GB of data for our test cluster - Most of our data comes from other databases, so in most cases, we already have replicated sources somewhere, and there are only a handful of collections whose source is directly in the DWH (such as snapshots, some external data we've fetched at some point, google analytics, etc) and needs appropriate level of replication - We are a team of 30-ish people, we do not have critical needs regarding analytics speed, and we do not need real time. We rebuild our DBT models 2-3 times a day and this usually proves enough

          Apart from postgreSQL, I haven't really found open-source or on-premise alternatives for setting up a data warehouse, and running transformations with DBT. There is also the question of data ingestion, I've selected Airbyte and @meltano and I have troubles understanding if one of the 2 is better but Airbytes seems to have a bigger community.

          What do you suggest regarding the data warehouse, and the ELT workflows ? - Kubernetes or not kubernetes ? - Postgresql or something else ? if postgre, what are the important configs you'd have in mind ? - Airbyte/DBT or something else.

          See more
          Dremio logo

          Dremio

          117
          343
          8
          The data lake engine
          117
          343
          + 1
          8
          PROS OF DREMIO
          • 3
            Nice GUI to enable more people to work with Data
          • 2
            Connect NoSQL databases with RDBMS
          • 2
            Easier to Deploy
          • 1
            Free
          CONS OF DREMIO
          • 1
            Works only on Iceberg structured data

          related Dremio posts

          Fivetran logo

          Fivetran

          96
          106
          0
          Simple, reliable data integration for analytics teams
          96
          106
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF FIVETRAN
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF FIVETRAN
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Fivetran posts

              Azure Synapse logo

              Azure Synapse

              93
              223
              10
              Analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics
              93
              223
              + 1
              10
              PROS OF AZURE SYNAPSE
              • 4
                ETL
              • 3
                Security
              • 2
                Serverless
              • 1
                Doesn't support cross database query
              CONS OF AZURE SYNAPSE
              • 1
                Dictionary Size Limitation - CCI
              • 1
                Concurrency

              related Azure Synapse posts