Alternatives to Centrify logo

Alternatives to Centrify

Okta, Duo, OneLogin, JumpCloud, and CyberArk are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Centrify.
13
31
+ 1
0

What is Centrify and what are its top alternatives?

It is privileged identity management and identity as a service solutions stop the breach by securing access to hybrid enterprises through the power of identity services.
Centrify is a tool in the Password Management category of a tech stack.
Centrify is an open source tool with GitHub stars and GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Centrify's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Centrify

  • Okta
    Okta

    Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning. ...

  • Duo
    Duo

    Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless. ...

  • OneLogin
    OneLogin

    OneLogin provides a cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) solution that offers simple single sign-on (SSO), making it easier for companies to secure and manage access to web applications both in the cloud and behind the firewall. ...

  • JumpCloud
    JumpCloud

    It is a Colorado-based startup that customers use to authenticate, authorize, and manage users, devices, and applications. They do it all easily via a common directory in the cloud, instead of through legacy, on-premises IT systems. ...

  • CyberArk
    CyberArk

    It is the only security software company focused on eliminating cyber threats using insider privileges to attack the heart of the enterprise. ...

  • BeyondTrust
    BeyondTrust

    It supports a family of privileged identity management, privileged remote access, and vulnerability management products for UNIX, Linux, Windows and Mac OS operating systems. ...

  • FreeIPA
    FreeIPA

    FreeIPA is an integrated Identity and Authentication solution for Linux/UNIX networked environments. A FreeIPA server provides centralized authentication, authorization and account information by storing data about user, groups, hosts and other objects necessary to manage the security aspects of a network of computers. ...

  • OpenSSL
    OpenSSL

    It is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols. It is also a general-purpose cryptography library. ...

Centrify alternatives & related posts

Okta logo

Okta

372
786
61
Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices
372
786
+ 1
61
PROS OF OKTA
  • 14
    REST API
  • 9
    SAML
  • 5
    OIDC OpenID Connect
  • 5
    User Provisioning
  • 5
    Easy LDAP integration
  • 4
    Universal Directory
  • 4
    API Access Management - oAuth2 as a service
  • 4
    Protect B2E, B2B, B2C apps
  • 3
    SSO, MFA for cloud, on-prem, custom apps
  • 3
    Easy Active Directory integration
  • 3
    Tons of Identity Management features
  • 1
    SWA applications Integration
  • 1
    SOC2
  • 0
    Test
CONS OF OKTA
  • 4
    Pricing is too high
  • 1
    Okta verify (Multi-factor Authentication)

related Okta posts

Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

See more
Micha Mailänder
CEO & Co-Founder at Dechea · | 4 upvotes · 53.2K views
Shared insights
on
FaunaFaunaMongoDBMongoDBOktaOktaAuth0Auth0
at

If these three are your options, I would recommend going with Auth0. They have all functionality available as developer API (Okta e.g. not) so you can manage your instance with Infrastructure as code and can also easily add functionalities relatively easily with the API. They are also really powerful if we're talking about ABAC (Attribute based access control). You can also enrich your access token with custom claims from your MongoDB, that can be probably really useful, as you said that you're dealing with multi tenancy.

We're using Auth0 in combination with Fauna Fauna is a database, so it would challenge you're mongodb. But Faunadb is the first database that implemented a full end user ABAC system directly in the database. (And also a lot easier than the ABAC systems from Okta or Auth0). This helps us, to use Auth0 only as identity platform and doing all the authorization with enriched claims over Fauna. With that you can skip in a lot of the cases you're backend, and you can request directly from the frontend your database (Blazing fast). Also, you can replace in some years Auth0 a lot easier with some upcoming cheaper (Auth0 was bought by Okta for a hilarious price) and "easy to use" passwordless identity provider like Passage.id

See more
Duo logo

Duo

19
41
1
A next-generation package manager for the front end
19
41
+ 1
1
PROS OF DUO
  • 1
    Lean and efficient
CONS OF DUO
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Duo posts

    OneLogin logo

    OneLogin

    91
    180
    6
    On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more
    91
    180
    + 1
    6
    PROS OF ONELOGIN
    • 2
      SAML
    • 1
      Great Customer Support
    • 1
      Easy setup
    • 1
      REST API
    • 1
      Directory synchronization
    CONS OF ONELOGIN
      Be the first to leave a con

      related OneLogin posts

      JumpCloud logo

      JumpCloud

      22
      24
      0
      The first Directory-as-a-Service (DaaS), securely connects employee identities devices, apps & networks
      22
      24
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF JUMPCLOUD
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF JUMPCLOUD
          Be the first to leave a con

          related JumpCloud posts

          CyberArk logo

          CyberArk

          35
          60
          0
          Proactively stops the most advanced cyber threats
          35
          60
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF CYBERARK
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF CYBERARK
              Be the first to leave a con

              related CyberArk posts

              BeyondTrust logo

              BeyondTrust

              9
              18
              0
              Privileged access management solutions
              9
              18
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF BEYONDTRUST
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF BEYONDTRUST
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related BeyondTrust posts

                  FreeIPA logo

                  FreeIPA

                  39
                  88
                  2
                  Manage Linux users and client hosts in your realm from one central location with CLI, Web UI or...
                  39
                  88
                  + 1
                  2
                  PROS OF FREEIPA
                  • 1
                    Manages sudo command groups and sudo commands
                  • 1
                    Manages host and host groups
                  CONS OF FREEIPA
                    Be the first to leave a con

                    related FreeIPA posts

                    OpenSSL logo

                    OpenSSL

                    12K
                    6.1K
                    0
                    Full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security and Secure Sockets Layer protocols
                    12K
                    6.1K
                    + 1
                    0
                    PROS OF OPENSSL
                      Be the first to leave a pro
                      CONS OF OPENSSL
                        Be the first to leave a con

                        related OpenSSL posts

                        Simon Reymann
                        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 5.7M views

                        Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

                        • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
                        • Respectively Git as revision control system
                        • SourceTree as Git GUI
                        • Visual Studio Code as IDE
                        • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
                        • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
                        • SonarQube as quality gate
                        • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
                        • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
                        • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
                        • Heroku for deploying in test environments
                        • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
                        • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
                        • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
                        • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
                        • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

                        The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

                        • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
                        • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
                        • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
                        • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
                        • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
                        • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
                        See more