Alternatives to Beego logo

Alternatives to Beego

Revel, Iris, Echo, Django, and Buffalo are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Beego.
52
98
+ 1
0

What is Beego and what are its top alternatives?

It is a RESTful HTTP framework for the rapid development of Go applications including APIs, web apps and backend services with integrated Go specific features such as interfaces and struct embedding.
Beego is a tool in the Frameworks (Full Stack) category of a tech stack.
Beego is an open source tool with 743 GitHub stars and 183 GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Beego's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Beego

  • Revel
    Revel

    Revel makes it easy to build web applications using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern by relying on conventions that require a certain structure in your application. In return, it is very light on configuration and enables an extremely fast development cycle. ...

  • Iris
    Iris

    The fastest web framework for Go.

  • Echo
    Echo

    It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang). ...

  • Django
    Django

    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. ...

  • Buffalo
    Buffalo

    Buffalo is Go web framework. Yeah, I hate the word "framework" too! Buffalo is different though. Buffalo doesn't want to re-invent wheels like routing and templating. Buffalo is glue that wraps all of the best packages available and makes them all play nicely together. ...

  • Laravel
    Laravel

    It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

Beego alternatives & related posts

Revel logo

Revel

36
38
A high productivity, full-stack web framework for the Go language
36
38
PROS OF REVEL
  • 16
    Go
  • 6
    High-Productivity
  • 5
    Full-Stack
  • 4
    High performance
  • 4
    MVC
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Simple
CONS OF REVEL
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Revel posts

    Iris logo

    Iris

    83
    16
    The fastest web framework for Go in (THIS) earth
    83
    16
    PROS OF IRIS
    • 6
      Fast
    • 4
      Easy to use
    • 3
      Almost real-time support to its users
    • 2
      Fluent API
    • 1
      MVC efficient
    CONS OF IRIS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Iris posts

      Echo logo

      Echo

      303
      59
      High performance, extensible, minimalist Go web framework
      303
      59
      PROS OF ECHO
      • 11
        Easy to use
      • 10
        Highly customizable
      • 10
        Performance
      • 9
        Open source
      • 9
        Lightweight
      • 7
        Middleware
      • 3
        Minimal
      CONS OF ECHO
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Echo posts

        Django logo

        Django

        38.6K
        4.2K
        The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
        38.6K
        4.2K
        PROS OF DJANGO
        • 675
          Rapid development
        • 488
          Open source
        • 426
          Great community
        • 380
          Easy to learn
        • 277
          Mvc
        • 232
          Beautiful code
        • 223
          Elegant
        • 208
          Free
        • 203
          Great packages
        • 194
          Great libraries
        • 80
          Comes with auth and crud admin panel
        • 79
          Restful
        • 78
          Powerful
        • 76
          Great documentation
        • 72
          Great for web
        • 57
          Python
        • 43
          Great orm
        • 41
          Great for api
        • 32
          All included
        • 29
          Fast
        • 25
          Web Apps
        • 23
          Clean
        • 23
          Easy setup
        • 21
          Used by top startups
        • 19
          Sexy
        • 19
          ORM
        • 15
          The Django community
        • 14
          Allows for very rapid development with great libraries
        • 14
          Convention over configuration
        • 11
          King of backend world
        • 10
          Full stack
        • 10
          Great MVC and templating engine
        • 8
          Mvt
        • 8
          Fast prototyping
        • 7
          Its elegant and practical
        • 7
          Easy to develop end to end AI Models
        • 7
          Batteries included
        • 6
          Cross-Platform
        • 6
          Very quick to get something up and running
        • 6
          Have not found anything that it can't do
        • 5
          Zero code burden to change databases
        • 5
          Great peformance
        • 5
          Python community
        • 5
          Easy Structure , useful inbuilt library
        • 4
          Easy to use
        • 4
          Map
        • 4
          Easy to change database manager
        • 4
          Full-Text Search
        • 4
          Just the right level of abstraction
        • 4
          Many libraries
        • 4
          Modular
        • 4
          Easy
        • 3
          Scaffold
        • 1
          Node js
        • 1
          Built in common security
        • 1
          Great default admin panel
        • 1
          Scalable
        • 1
          Gigante ta
        • 1
          Cons
        • 1
          Fastapi
        • 0
          Rails
        CONS OF DJANGO
        • 26
          Underpowered templating
        • 22
          Autoreload restarts whole server
        • 22
          Underpowered ORM
        • 15
          URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
        • 10
          Internal subcomponents coupling
        • 8
          Not nodejs
        • 8
          Configuration hell
        • 7
          Admin
        • 5
          Not as clean and nice documentation like Laravel
        • 4
          Python
        • 3
          Not typed
        • 3
          Bloated admin panel included
        • 2
          Overwhelming folder structure
        • 2
          InEffective Multithreading
        • 1
          Not type safe

        related Django posts

        Shared insights
        on
        TensorFlowTensorFlowDjangoDjangoPythonPython

        Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.

        It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.

        I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.

        What do you think about TensorFlow?

        Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.

        See more
        Dmitry Mukhin
        Engineer at Uploadcare · | 25 upvotes · 2.6M views

        Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

        Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

        For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It’s worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren’t running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we’d go with Ember.js.

        However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

        All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

        See more
        Buffalo logo

        Buffalo

        13
        5
        MVC Web Framework for Go
        13
        5
        PROS OF BUFFALO
        • 4
          Go
        • 1
          Friendly Api
        CONS OF BUFFALO
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Buffalo posts

          Laravel logo

          Laravel

          28.7K
          3.9K
          A PHP Framework For Web Artisans
          28.7K
          3.9K
          PROS OF LARAVEL
          • 555
            Clean architecture
          • 392
            Growing community
          • 370
            Composer friendly
          • 344
            Open source
          • 325
            The only framework to consider for php
          • 221
            Mvc
          • 210
            Quickly develop
          • 168
            Dependency injection
          • 156
            Application architecture
          • 143
            Embraces good community packages
          • 73
            Write less, do more
          • 71
            Orm (eloquent)
          • 66
            Restful routing
          • 57
            Database migrations & seeds
          • 55
            Artisan scaffolding and migrations
          • 41
            Great documentation
          • 40
            Awesome
          • 30
            Awsome, Powerfull, Fast and Rapid
          • 29
            Build Apps faster, easier and better
          • 28
            Eloquent ORM
          • 26
            JSON friendly
          • 26
            Modern PHP
          • 26
            Promotes elegant coding
          • 25
            Most easy for me
          • 24
            Easy to learn, scalability
          • 23
            Beautiful
          • 22
            Blade Template
          • 21
            Test-Driven
          • 15
            Security
          • 15
            Based on SOLID
          • 13
            Clean Documentation
          • 13
            Easy to attach Middleware
          • 13
            Cool
          • 12
            Simple
          • 12
            Convention over Configuration
          • 11
            Easy Request Validatin
          • 10
            Simpler
          • 10
            Easy to use
          • 10
            Fast
          • 9
            Get going quickly straight out of the box. BYOKDM
          • 9
            Its just wow
          • 8
            Laravel + Cassandra = Killer Framework
          • 8
            Simplistic , easy and faster
          • 8
            Friendly API
          • 7
            Less dependencies
          • 7
            Super easy and powerful
          • 6
            Great customer support
          • 6
            Its beautiful to code in
          • 5
            Speed
          • 5
            Eloquent
          • 5
            Composer
          • 5
            Minimum system requirements
          • 5
            Laravel Mix
          • 5
            Easy
          • 5
            The only "cons" is wrong! No static method just Facades
          • 5
            Fast and Clarify framework
          • 5
            Active Record
          • 5
            Php7
          • 4
            Ease of use
          • 4
            Laragon
          • 4
            Laravel casher
          • 4
            Easy views handling and great ORM
          • 4
            Laravel Forge and Envoy
          • 4
            Cashier with Braintree and Stripe
          • 3
            Laravel Passport
          • 3
            Laravel Spark
          • 3
            Intuitive usage
          • 3
            Laravel Horizon and Telescope
          • 3
            Laravel Nova
          • 3
            Rapid development
          • 2
            Laravel Vite
          • 2
            Scout
          • 2
            Deployment
          • 1
            Succint sintax
          CONS OF LARAVEL
          • 54
            PHP
          • 33
            Too many dependency
          • 23
            Slower than the other two
          • 17
            A lot of static method calls for convenience
          • 15
            Too many include
          • 13
            Heavy
          • 9
            Bloated
          • 8
            Laravel
          • 7
            Confusing
          • 5
            Too underrated
          • 4
            Not fast with MongoDB
          • 1
            Slow and too much big
          • 1
            Not using SOLID principles
          • 1
            Difficult to learn

          related Laravel posts

          I need to build a web application plus android and IOS apps for an enterprise, like an e-commerce portal. It will have intensive use of MySQL to display thousands (40-50k) of live product information in an interactive table (searchable, filterable), live delivery tracking. It has to be secure, as it will handle information on customers, sales, inventory. Here is the technology stack: Backend: Laravel 7 Frondend: Vue.js, React or AngularJS?

          Need help deciding technology stack. Thanks.

          See more
          David Watson
          at Realtime App Solutions · | 15 upvotes · 108.5K views

          Coming from a non-web development environment background, I was a bit lost a first and bewildered by all the varying tools and platforms, and spent much too long evaluating before eventualy deciding on Laravel as the main core of my development.

          But as I started development with Laravel that lead me into discovering Vue.js for creating beautiful front-end components that were easy to configure and extend, so I decided to standardise on Vue.js for most of my front-end development.

          During my search for additional Vue.js components, a chance comment in a @laravel forum , led me to discover Quasar Framework initially for it's wide range of in-built components ... but once, I realised that Quasar Framework allowed me to use the same codebase to create apps for SPA, PWA, iOS, Android, and Electron then I was hooked.

          So, I'm now using mainly just Quasar Framework for all the front-end, with Laravel providing a backend API service to the Front-end apps.

          I'm deploying this all to DigitalOcean droplets via service called Moss.sh which deploys my private GitHub repositories directly to DigitalOcean in realtime.

          See more
          JavaScript logo

          JavaScript

          371.9K
          8.1K
          Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
          371.9K
          8.1K
          PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 1.7K
            Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 1.5K
            It's everywhere
          • 1.2K
            Lots of great frameworks
          • 899
            Fast
          • 746
            Light weight
          • 425
            Flexible
          • 392
            You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
          • 286
            Non-blocking i/o
          • 237
            Ubiquitousness
          • 191
            Expressive
          • 55
            Extended functionality to web pages
          • 49
            Relatively easy language
          • 46
            Executed on the client side
          • 30
            Relatively fast to the end user
          • 25
            Pure Javascript
          • 21
            Functional programming
          • 15
            Async
          • 13
            Full-stack
          • 12
            Its everywhere
          • 12
            Future Language of The Web
          • 12
            Setup is easy
          • 11
            JavaScript is the New PHP
          • 11
            Because I love functions
          • 10
            Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
          • 9
            Everyone use it
          • 9
            Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
          • 9
            Easy
          • 9
            Expansive community
          • 8
            For the good parts
          • 8
            Easy to hire developers
          • 8
            No need to use PHP
          • 8
            Most Popular Language in the World
          • 8
            Powerful
          • 8
            Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
          • 7
            It's fun
          • 7
            Its fun and fast
          • 7
            Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
          • 7
            Agile, packages simple to use
          • 7
            Supports lambdas and closures
          • 7
            Love-hate relationship
          • 7
            Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
          • 7
            Evolution of C
          • 7
            Hard not to use
          • 7
            Versitile
          • 7
            Nice
          • 6
            Easy to make something
          • 6
            Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
          • 6
            1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 6
            Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
          • 6
            It let's me use Babel & Typescript
          • 5
            Clojurescript
          • 5
            Everywhere
          • 5
            Scope manipulation
          • 5
            Function expressions are useful for callbacks
          • 5
            Stockholm Syndrome
          • 5
            Promise relationship
          • 5
            Client processing
          • 5
            What to add
          • 4
            Because it is so simple and lightweight
          • 4
            Only Programming language on browser
          • 1
            Subskill #4
          • 1
            Test2
          • 1
            Easy to understand
          • 1
            Not the best
          • 1
            Easy to learn
          • 1
            Hard to learn
          • 1
            Easy to learn and test
          • 1
            Love it
          • 1
            Test
          • 0
            Hard 彤
          CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 22
            A constant moving target, too much churn
          • 20
            Horribly inconsistent
          • 15
            Javascript is the New PHP
          • 9
            No ability to monitor memory utilitization
          • 8
            Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
          • 7
            Thinks strange results are better than errors
          • 6
            Can be ugly
          • 3
            No GitHub
          • 2
            Slow
          • 0
            HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

          related JavaScript posts

          Zach Holman

          Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

          But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

          But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

          Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

          See more
          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Python logo

          Python

          250.6K
          6.9K
          A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
          250.6K
          6.9K
          PROS OF PYTHON
          • 1.2K
            Great libraries
          • 965
            Readable code
          • 848
            Beautiful code
          • 789
            Rapid development
          • 692
            Large community
          • 439
            Open source
          • 394
            Elegant
          • 283
            Great community
          • 274
            Object oriented
          • 222
            Dynamic typing
          • 78
            Great standard library
          • 62
            Very fast
          • 56
            Functional programming
          • 52
            Easy to learn
          • 47
            Scientific computing
          • 36
            Great documentation
          • 30
            Productivity
          • 29
            Matlab alternative
          • 29
            Easy to read
          • 25
            Simple is better than complex
          • 21
            It's the way I think
          • 20
            Imperative
          • 19
            Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
          • 19
            Free
          • 17
            Powerfull language
          • 17
            Machine learning support
          • 16
            Fast and simple
          • 14
            Scripting
          • 12
            Explicit is better than implicit
          • 11
            Ease of development
          • 10
            Clear and easy and powerfull
          • 9
            Unlimited power
          • 8
            It's lean and fun to code
          • 8
            Import antigravity
          • 7
            Print "life is short, use python"
          • 7
            Python has great libraries for data processing
          • 6
            Although practicality beats purity
          • 6
            Fast coding and good for competitions
          • 6
            There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
          • 6
            High Documented language
          • 6
            Readability counts
          • 6
            Rapid Prototyping
          • 6
            I love snakes
          • 6
            Now is better than never
          • 6
            Flat is better than nested
          • 6
            Great for tooling
          • 5
            Great for analytics
          • 5
            Web scraping
          • 5
            Lists, tuples, dictionaries
          • 4
            Complex is better than complicated
          • 4
            Socially engaged community
          • 4
            Plotting
          • 4
            Beautiful is better than ugly
          • 4
            Easy to learn and use
          • 4
            Easy to setup and run smooth
          • 4
            Simple and easy to learn
          • 4
            Multiple Inheritence
          • 4
            CG industry needs
          • 3
            List comprehensions
          • 3
            Powerful language for AI
          • 3
            Flexible and easy
          • 3
            It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
          • 3
            Many types of collections
          • 3
            If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
          • 3
            If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
          • 3
            Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
          • 3
            Pip install everything
          • 3
            No cruft
          • 3
            Generators
          • 3
            Import this
          • 2
            Can understand easily who are new to programming
          • 2
            Securit
          • 2
            Should START with this but not STICK with This
          • 2
            A-to-Z
          • 2
            Because of Netflix
          • 2
            Only one way to do it
          • 2
            Better outcome
          • 2
            Good for hacking
          • 2
            Batteries included
          • 2
            Procedural programming
          • 1
            Sexy af
          • 1
            Automation friendly
          • 1
            Slow
          • 1
            Best friend for NLP
          • 0
            Powerful
          • 0
            Keep it simple
          • 0
            Ni
          CONS OF PYTHON
          • 53
            Still divided between python 2 and python 3
          • 28
            Performance impact
          • 26
            Poor syntax for anonymous functions
          • 22
            GIL
          • 19
            Package management is a mess
          • 14
            Too imperative-oriented
          • 12
            Hard to understand
          • 12
            Dynamic typing
          • 12
            Very slow
          • 8
            Indentations matter a lot
          • 8
            Not everything is expression
          • 7
            Incredibly slow
          • 7
            Explicit self parameter in methods
          • 6
            Requires C functions for dynamic modules
          • 6
            Poor DSL capabilities
          • 6
            No anonymous functions
          • 5
            Fake object-oriented programming
          • 5
            Threading
          • 5
            The "lisp style" whitespaces
          • 5
            Official documentation is unclear.
          • 5
            Hard to obfuscate
          • 5
            Circular import
          • 4
            Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
          • 4
            The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
          • 4
            Not suitable for autocomplete
          • 2
            Meta classes
          • 1
            Training wheels (forced indentation)

          related Python posts

          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          TensorFlowTensorFlowDjangoDjangoPythonPython

          Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.

          It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.

          I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.

          What do you think about TensorFlow?

          Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.

          See more