Alternatives to AWS Device Farm logo

Alternatives to AWS Device Farm

Xamarin Test Cloud, Firebase, BrowserStack, Xamarin, and Sauce Labs are the most popular alternatives and competitors to AWS Device Farm.
75
178
+ 1
5

What is AWS Device Farm and what are its top alternatives?

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.
AWS Device Farm is a tool in the Load and Performance Testing category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to AWS Device Farm

  • Xamarin Test Cloud
    Xamarin Test Cloud

    Run your app on our huge (and growing) collection of real devices from around the world. Select devices based on form factor, manufacturer, operating system, or even popularity in your target market. We’re adding over 100 devices every month, and if there’s a specific device you need, we’re taking requests. ...

  • Firebase
    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • BrowserStack
    BrowserStack

    BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. ...

  • Xamarin
    Xamarin

    Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. ...

  • Sauce Labs
    Sauce Labs

    Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready. ...

  • Kobiton
    Kobiton

    It enables developers and testers to perform automated and manual testing of mobile apps and websites on real devices. Modern DevOps and Quality environments require apps to be tested on hundreds of device/OS/browser combinations. Managing an in-house device-lab is expensive, resource intensive, restrictive and very manual. Kobiton allows for instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts, and also allows current on-premise devices to be plugged in to form a holistic testing cloud. ...

  • pCloudy
    pCloudy

    It is a smart mobile app testing solution that lets developers ensure their users enjoy a smooth and consistent experience. With it, developers can access manual and automated testing options to facilitate the swift debugging of their applications. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

AWS Device Farm alternatives & related posts

Xamarin Test Cloud logo

Xamarin Test Cloud

44
74
3
Automatically test your app on 1,000 devices in the cloud
44
74
+ 1
3
PROS OF XAMARIN TEST CLOUD
  • 3
    Integrated with Visual Studio, Xamarin Studio or CLI
CONS OF XAMARIN TEST CLOUD
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Xamarin Test Cloud posts

    Firebase logo

    Firebase

    40.1K
    34.4K
    2K
    The Realtime App Platform
    40.1K
    34.4K
    + 1
    2K
    PROS OF FIREBASE
    • 371
      Realtime backend made easy
    • 270
      Fast and responsive
    • 242
      Easy setup
    • 215
      Real-time
    • 191
      JSON
    • 134
      Free
    • 128
      Backed by google
    • 83
      Angular adaptor
    • 68
      Reliable
    • 36
      Great customer support
    • 32
      Great documentation
    • 25
      Real-time synchronization
    • 21
      Mobile friendly
    • 18
      Rapid prototyping
    • 14
      Great security
    • 12
      Automatic scaling
    • 11
      Freakingly awesome
    • 8
      Chat
    • 8
      Angularfire is an amazing addition!
    • 8
      Super fast development
    • 6
      Built in user auth/oauth
    • 6
      Firebase hosting
    • 6
      Ios adaptor
    • 6
      Awesome next-gen backend
    • 4
      Speed of light
    • 4
      Very easy to use
    • 3
      Great
    • 3
      It's made development super fast
    • 3
      Brilliant for startups
    • 2
      Free hosting
    • 2
      Cloud functions
    • 2
      JS Offline and Sync suport
    • 2
      Low battery consumption
    • 2
      .net
    • 2
      The concurrent updates create a great experience
    • 2
      Push notification
    • 2
      I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
    • 2
      Great all-round functionality
    • 2
      Free authentication solution
    • 1
      Easy Reactjs integration
    • 1
      Google's support
    • 1
      Free SSL
    • 1
      CDN & cache out of the box
    • 1
      Easy to use
    • 1
      Large
    • 1
      Faster workflow
    • 1
      Serverless
    • 1
      Good Free Limits
    • 1
      Simple and easy
    CONS OF FIREBASE
    • 31
      Can become expensive
    • 16
      No open source, you depend on external company
    • 15
      Scalability is not infinite
    • 9
      Not Flexible Enough
    • 7
      Cant filter queries
    • 3
      Very unstable server
    • 3
      No Relational Data
    • 2
      Too many errors
    • 2
      No offline sync

    related Firebase posts

    Johnny Bell

    I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

    I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

    I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

    Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

    Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

    With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

    If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

    See more
    Collins Ogbuzuru
    Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 15 upvotes · 7.3K views

    Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

    React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

    ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

    Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

    I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

    See more
    BrowserStack logo

    BrowserStack

    2.7K
    2K
    499
    BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale, & optimize...
    2.7K
    2K
    + 1
    499
    PROS OF BROWSERSTACK
    • 134
      Multiple browsers
    • 75
      Ease of use
    • 64
      Real browsers
    • 43
      Ability to use it locally
    • 26
      Good price
    • 20
      Great web interface
    • 18
      IE support
    • 16
      Official mobile emulators
    • 14
      Instant access
    • 14
      Cloud-based access
    • 11
      Real mobile devices
    • 7
      Multiple Desktop OS
    • 7
      Selenium compatible
    • 7
      Screenshots
    • 6
      Can be used for Testing and E2E
    • 5
      Pre-installed developer tools
    • 4
      Video of test runs
    • 3
      Many browsers
    • 3
      Favourites
    • 3
      Webdriver compatible
    • 3
      Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing
    • 2
      Free for Open Source
    • 2
      Unify and track test cases
    • 2
      Test automation dashboard
    • 2
      Test Management
    • 2
      Cross-browser testing
    • 2
      Cypress Compatible
    • 2
      Bi-directional Jira Sync
    • 1
      Speed is fast
    • 1
      Real devices
    • 0
      Visual testing and review
    • 0
      Test WCAG Compliance
    • 0
      Web accessibility
    CONS OF BROWSERSTACK
    • 2
      Very limited choice of minor versions

    related BrowserStack posts

    Tassanai Singprom

    This is my stack in Application & Data

    JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

    My Utilities Tools

    Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

    My Devops Tools

    Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

    My Business Tools

    Slack

    See more
    Zarema Khalilova
    Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 293.1K views

    I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

    See more
    Xamarin logo

    Xamarin

    1.3K
    1.5K
    785
    Create iOS, Android and Mac apps in C#
    1.3K
    1.5K
    + 1
    785
    PROS OF XAMARIN
    • 121
      Power of c# on mobile devices
    • 81
      Native performance
    • 79
      Native apps with native ui controls
    • 73
      No javascript - truely compiled code
    • 67
      Sharing more than 90% of code over all platforms
    • 45
      Ability to leverage visual studio
    • 44
      Mvvm pattern
    • 44
      Many great c# libraries
    • 36
      Amazing support
    • 34
      Powerful platform for .net developers
    • 19
      GUI Native look and Feel
    • 16
      Nuget package manager
    • 12
      Free
    • 9
      Backed by Microsoft
    • 9
      Enables code reuse on server
    • 8
      Faster Development
    • 7
      Use of third-party .NET libraries
    • 7
      It's free since Apr 2016
    • 7
      Best performance than other cross-platform
    • 7
      Easy Debug and Trace
    • 7
      Open Source
    • 6
      Mac IDE (Xamarin Studio)
    • 6
      Xamarin.forms is the best, it's amazing
    • 5
      That just work for every scenario
    • 5
      C# mult paradigm language
    • 5
      Power of C#, no javascript, visual studio
    • 4
      Great docs
    • 4
      Compatible to develop Hybrid apps
    • 4
      Microsoft stack
    • 4
      Microsoft backed
    • 3
      Well Designed
    • 3
      Small learning curve for Mobile developers
    • 2
      Ionic
    • 2
      Ability to leverage legacy C and C++
    CONS OF XAMARIN
    • 9
      Build times
    • 5
      Visual Studio
    • 4
      Price
    • 3
      Complexity
    • 3
      Scalability
    • 2
      Nuget
    • 2
      Maturity
    • 2
      Build Tools
    • 2
      Support
    • 0
      Maturidade
    • 0
      Performance

    related Xamarin posts

    Greg Neumann
    Indie, Solo, Developer · | 8 upvotes · 1.4M views

    Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

    This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

    But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

    I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

    Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

    See more
    Bhupendra Madhu
    Web Developer at Ecombooks · | 8 upvotes · 520.2K views

    I want to learn cross-platform application frameworks like React Native, Flutter, Xamarin, or Ionic, and I'm a web developer. I can learn other programming languages as well. But I'm confused about what to learn, which framework is best, and which framework will last long as the application grows further into complexity.

    See more
    Sauce Labs logo

    Sauce Labs

    313
    434
    438
    Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.
    313
    434
    + 1
    438
    PROS OF SAUCE LABS
    • 60
      Selenium-compatible
    • 46
      Webdriver compatible
    • 35
      Video recordings of every test
    • 31
      Qa
    • 29
      Mobile support
    • 26
      Any programming language
    • 23
      Developer tools
    • 21
      Test local and firewalled servers
    • 20
      Jenkins integration
    • 18
      Pristine VMs
    • 17
      CI Compatible
    • 11
      Appium support
    • 9
      Parallel testing
    • 8
      Rapid environment preparation
    • 8
      Mobile device support
    • 7
      Easy testing on almost any device
    • 7
      Allows me to Focus more test automation rather than IT
    • 6
      Secure testing and easy setup
    • 5
      Easy setup with CI and fast automated tests
    • 5
      Quick support response
    • 4
      Fast and reliable to host the automated tests
    • 4
      Easy to setup and understand,
    • 3
      Easy setup and integration with Travis Ci
    • 3
      Maintained browser matrix
    • 3
      Easy onboarding, do not need to manager VMs/OS/Browsers
    • 2
      Efficient tool to verify product quality
    • 2
      Teamcity Integration and mobile testing win
    • 2
      Hany for platform testing
    • 2
      Great documentation
    • 2
      Generous free trial
    • 2
      Easy. Straightforward. Scalable
    • 2
      Great way to integrate test suite on cloud
    • 2
      Simplicity of Sauce-connect
    • 1
      Very Good, Quick, flexible Infrastructure Support
    • 1
      It's great for my QA work
    • 1
      Awesome tech support
    • 1
      Having this available for CI servers is fantastic
    • 1
      Amazing service to do cloud cross browser testing
    • 1
      Depth of integrations
    • 1
      Because of its cloud based support for appium
    • 1
      Easy setup, Works great with selenium.
    • 1
      QE support
    • 1
      Manuals are not very well versed for beginners
    • 1
      Secure testing
    • 1
      Cheaper than browserstack
    • 1
      Stable
    • 0
      Simple to set up and integrate so many browser configs
    CONS OF SAUCE LABS
    • 2
      Relatively slow
    • 2
      Expensive

    related Sauce Labs posts

    Shared insights
    on
    Sauce LabsSauce LabsSeleniumSelenium

    I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

    I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

    See more
    Zarema Khalilova
    Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 293.1K views

    I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

    See more
    Kobiton logo

    Kobiton

    23
    66
    0
    A mobile cloud platform that enables users to perform manual or automated testing
    23
    66
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF KOBITON
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF KOBITON
      • 1
        Limited minutes

      related Kobiton posts

      pCloudy logo

      pCloudy

      16
      21
      0
      A mobile application testing platform
      16
      21
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF PCLOUDY
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF PCLOUDY
          Be the first to leave a con

          related pCloudy posts

          JavaScript logo

          JavaScript

          349.6K
          266.2K
          8.1K
          Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
          349.6K
          266.2K
          + 1
          8.1K
          PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 1.7K
            Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 1.5K
            It's everywhere
          • 1.2K
            Lots of great frameworks
          • 896
            Fast
          • 745
            Light weight
          • 425
            Flexible
          • 392
            You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
          • 286
            Non-blocking i/o
          • 236
            Ubiquitousness
          • 191
            Expressive
          • 55
            Extended functionality to web pages
          • 49
            Relatively easy language
          • 46
            Executed on the client side
          • 30
            Relatively fast to the end user
          • 25
            Pure Javascript
          • 21
            Functional programming
          • 15
            Async
          • 13
            Full-stack
          • 12
            Setup is easy
          • 12
            Its everywhere
          • 11
            JavaScript is the New PHP
          • 11
            Because I love functions
          • 10
            Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
          • 9
            Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
          • 9
            Expansive community
          • 9
            Future Language of The Web
          • 9
            Easy
          • 8
            No need to use PHP
          • 8
            For the good parts
          • 8
            Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
          • 8
            Everyone use it
          • 8
            Most Popular Language in the World
          • 8
            Easy to hire developers
          • 7
            Love-hate relationship
          • 7
            Powerful
          • 7
            Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
          • 7
            Evolution of C
          • 7
            Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
          • 7
            Agile, packages simple to use
          • 7
            Supports lambdas and closures
          • 6
            1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 6
            It's fun
          • 6
            Hard not to use
          • 6
            Nice
          • 6
            Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
          • 6
            Versitile
          • 6
            It let's me use Babel & Typescript
          • 6
            Easy to make something
          • 6
            Its fun and fast
          • 6
            Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
          • 5
            Function expressions are useful for callbacks
          • 5
            What to add
          • 5
            Client processing
          • 5
            Everywhere
          • 5
            Scope manipulation
          • 5
            Stockholm Syndrome
          • 5
            Promise relationship
          • 5
            Clojurescript
          • 4
            Because it is so simple and lightweight
          • 4
            Only Programming language on browser
          • 1
            Hard to learn
          • 1
            Test
          • 1
            Test2
          • 1
            Easy to understand
          • 1
            Not the best
          • 1
            Easy to learn
          • 1
            Subskill #4
          • 0
            Hard 彤
          CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 22
            A constant moving target, too much churn
          • 20
            Horribly inconsistent
          • 15
            Javascript is the New PHP
          • 9
            No ability to monitor memory utilitization
          • 8
            Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
          • 7
            Thinks strange results are better than errors
          • 6
            Can be ugly
          • 3
            No GitHub
          • 2
            Slow

          related JavaScript posts

          Zach Holman

          Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

          But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

          But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

          Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

          See more
          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 9.6M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more