Alternatives to Auth0 logo

Alternatives to Auth0

Stormpath, Amazon Cognito, Okta, Firebase, and Keycloak are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Auth0.
1.3K
2K
+ 1
215

What is Auth0 and what are its top alternatives?

Auth0 is an identity management platform that provides features like Single Sign-On, multi-factor authentication, and user management. It allows developers to easily integrate authentication and authorization into their applications, improving security and user experience. However, some limitations of Auth0 include its pricing structure for larger user bases and potential complexity in customization options.

  1. Okta: Okta is a complete identity management solution that offers features like Single Sign-On, API access management, and adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication. Pros include comprehensive capabilities and strong security measures, but some users find it expensive for small to medium-sized businesses compared to Auth0.
  2. Firebase Authentication: Firebase Authentication is a backend service by Google that provides easy-to-use SDKs for authentication. Key features include social login options and email/password authentication. The advantage of Firebase Authentication is its seamless integration with other Firebase services, but it may have limited customization options compared to Auth0.
  3. AWS Cognito: AWS Cognito is a cloud-based authentication service by Amazon Web Services that offers authentication, authorization, and user management for web and mobile apps. It provides scalable solutions and integration with other AWS services, but some users find it complex to set up and manage compared to Auth0.
  4. Keycloak: Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management solution that offers features like Single Sign-On, social login, and role-based access control. The advantage of Keycloak is its flexibility and customization options, but it may require more technical expertise to implement compared to Auth0.
  5. Azure Active Directory: Azure Active Directory is Microsoft's cloud-based identity and access management service that provides features like Single Sign-On, Multi-Factor Authentication, and user provisioning. Pros include seamless integration with other Microsoft products, but some users may find it more geared towards Enterprise clients compared to Auth0.
  6. Ping Identity: Ping Identity offers a comprehensive identity management platform with features like Single Sign-On, API security, and User Lifecycle Management. The advantage of Ping Identity is its focus on security and compliance, but it may have a steeper learning curve compared to Auth0.
  7. FusionAuth: FusionAuth is an open-source identity management platform that provides features like user registration, Single Sign-On, and OAuth support. The advantage of FusionAuth is its flexibility and customization options, but some users may find it lacking in certain enterprise-grade features compared to Auth0.
  8. OneLogin: OneLogin is a cloud-based Identity and Access Management platform that offers features like Single Sign-On, Multi-factor Authentication, and User Provisioning. Pros include ease of use and quick setup, but some users may find it less customizable compared to Auth0.
  9. MiniOrange: MiniOrange is a cloud-based identity and access management platform that offers features like Single Sign-On, adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication, and User Provisioning. The advantage of MiniOrange is its affordable pricing and easy integration with a wide range of applications, but it may lack some advanced features compared to Auth0.
  10. Gluu: Gluu is an open-source identity and access management platform that offers features like OAuth support, user management, and strong authentication. The advantage of Gluu is its open-source nature and customization options, but some users may find it less user-friendly compared to Auth0.

Top Alternatives to Auth0

  • Stormpath
    Stormpath

    Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services. ...

  • Amazon Cognito
    Amazon Cognito

    You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline. ...

  • Okta
    Okta

    Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning. ...

  • Firebase
    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • Keycloak
    Keycloak

    It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box. ...

  • OAuth.io
    OAuth.io

    OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days. ...

  • Passport
    Passport

    It is authentication middleware for Node.js. Extremely flexible and modular, It can be unobtrusively dropped in to any Express-based web application. A comprehensive set of strategies support authentication using a username and password, Facebook, Twitter, and more. ...

  • OneLogin
    OneLogin

    OneLogin provides a cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) solution that offers simple single sign-on (SSO), making it easier for companies to secure and manage access to web applications both in the cloud and behind the firewall. ...

Auth0 alternatives & related posts

Stormpath logo

Stormpath

40
96
146
User Management and Authentication for Developers
40
96
+ 1
146
PROS OF STORMPATH
  • 29
    Authentication
  • 22
    User Management
  • 19
    API Authentication
  • 17
    Token Authentication
  • 17
    Security Workflows
  • 16
    Secure
  • 7
    Easy setup and great support
  • 7
    Great customer support
  • 6
    they manage the required, so I can focus on innovation
  • 3
    Private Deployment
  • 2
    Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance
  • 1
    Rapid Development
  • 0
    SAML Support
CONS OF STORMPATH
  • 4
    Discontinued

related Stormpath posts

Amazon Cognito logo

Amazon Cognito

599
907
34
Securely manage and synchronize app data for your users across their mobile devices
599
907
+ 1
34
PROS OF AMAZON COGNITO
  • 14
    Backed by Amazon
  • 7
    Manage Unique Identities
  • 4
    Work Offline
  • 3
    MFA
  • 2
    Store and Sync
  • 1
    Free for first 50000 users
  • 1
    It works
  • 1
    Integrate with Google, Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, SAML
  • 1
    SDKs and code samples
CONS OF AMAZON COGNITO
  • 4
    Massive Pain to get working
  • 3
    Documentation often out of date
  • 2
    Login-UI sparsely customizable (e.g. no translation)
  • 1
    Docs are vast but mostly useless
  • 1
    MFA: there is no "forget device" function
  • 1
    Difficult to customize (basic-pack is more than humble)
  • 1
    Lacks many basic features
  • 1
    There is no "Logout" method in the API
  • 1
    Different Language SDKs not compatible
  • 1
    No recovery codes for MFA
  • 1
    Hard to find expiration times for tokens/codes
  • 1
    Only paid support

related Amazon Cognito posts

Jeyabalaji Subramanian

At FundsCorner, when we set out to pick up the front-end tech stack (around Dec 2017), we drove our decision based on the following considerations:

(1) We were clear that we will NOT have a hybrid app. We will start with Responsive Web & once there is traction, we will rollout our Android App. However, we wanted to ensure that the users have a consistent experience on both the Web & the App. So, the front-end framework must also have a material design component library which we can choose from.

(2) Before joining FundsCorner as a CTO, I had already worked with Angular. I enjoyed working with Angular, but I felt that I must choose something that will provide us with the fastest time from Concept to Reality.

(3) I am strong proponent of segregating HTML & JavaScript. I.e. I was not for writing or generating HTML through JavaScript. Because, this will mean that the Front-end developers I have to hire will always be very strong on JavaScript alongside HTML5 & CSS. I was looking for a Framework that was on JavaScript but not HEAVY on JavaScript.

(3) The first iteration of the web app was to be done by myself. But I was clear that when someone takes up the mantle, they will be able to come up the curve fast.

In the end, Vue.js and Vuetify satisfied all the above criteria with aplomb! When I did our first POC on Vue.js I could not believe that front-end development could be this fast. The documentation was par excellence and all the required essentials that come along with the Framework (viz. Routing, Store, Validations) etc. were available from the same community! It was also a breeze to integrate with other JavaScript libraries (such as Amazon Cognito).

By picking Vuetify, we were able to provide a consistent UI experience between our Web App and Native App, besides making the UI development ultra blazing fast!

In the end, we were able to rollout our Web App in record 6 weeks (that included the end to end Loan Origination flow, Loans management system & Customer engagement module). www.jeyabalaji.com

See more

I'm starting a new React Native project and trying to decide on an auth provider. Currently looking at Auth0 and Amazon Cognito. It will need to play nice with a Django Rest Framework backend.

See more
Okta logo

Okta

409
814
65
Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices
409
814
+ 1
65
PROS OF OKTA
  • 14
    REST API
  • 9
    SAML
  • 5
    OIDC OpenID Connect
  • 5
    Protect B2E, B2B, B2C apps
  • 5
    User Provisioning
  • 5
    Easy LDAP integration
  • 4
    Universal Directory
  • 4
    Tons of Identity Management features
  • 4
    SSO, MFA for cloud, on-prem, custom apps
  • 4
    API Access Management - oAuth2 as a service
  • 3
    Easy Active Directory integration
  • 2
    SWA applications Integration
  • 1
    SOC2
  • 0
    Test
CONS OF OKTA
  • 5
    Pricing is too high
  • 1
    Okta verify (Multi-factor Authentication)

related Okta posts

Shared insights
on
OktaOktaKeycloakKeycloakGitHubGitHub

Hello,

I'm trying to implement a solution for this situation:

There is a restaurant in which users can access RestAPI, using Google, Facebook, GitHub. There is even the possibility to login inside using the SPID authentication. In the first case I was considering Keycloak as a better solution for this case, but then i've read about Okta and its pros.

I cannot understand reading and searching on Google if SPID authentication is supported by OKTA. Looks like to be, because it should be using SAML, but I haven't found a clear solution.

See more
Shared insights
on
OktaOktaKeycloakKeycloak

I want some good advice on which one I should prefer. (Keycloak or Okta) Since Keycloak is open source, it will be our first preference, but do we face some limitations with this approach? And since our product is SAAS based and we support the following authentications at present. 1. AT DB level 2. 3rd part IDP providers 3. LDAP/AD...

See more
Firebase logo

Firebase

40.3K
34.6K
2K
The Realtime App Platform
40.3K
34.6K
+ 1
2K
PROS OF FIREBASE
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
  • 134
    Free
  • 128
    Backed by google
  • 83
    Angular adaptor
  • 68
    Reliable
  • 36
    Great customer support
  • 32
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Real-time synchronization
  • 21
    Mobile friendly
  • 18
    Rapid prototyping
  • 14
    Great security
  • 12
    Automatic scaling
  • 11
    Freakingly awesome
  • 8
    Chat
  • 8
    Angularfire is an amazing addition!
  • 8
    Super fast development
  • 6
    Built in user auth/oauth
  • 6
    Firebase hosting
  • 6
    Ios adaptor
  • 6
    Awesome next-gen backend
  • 4
    Speed of light
  • 4
    Very easy to use
  • 3
    Great
  • 3
    It's made development super fast
  • 3
    Brilliant for startups
  • 2
    Free hosting
  • 2
    Cloud functions
  • 2
    JS Offline and Sync suport
  • 2
    Low battery consumption
  • 2
    .net
  • 2
    The concurrent updates create a great experience
  • 2
    Push notification
  • 2
    I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
  • 2
    Great all-round functionality
  • 2
    Free authentication solution
  • 1
    Easy Reactjs integration
  • 1
    Google's support
  • 1
    Free SSL
  • 1
    CDN & cache out of the box
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Large
  • 1
    Faster workflow
  • 1
    Serverless
  • 1
    Good Free Limits
  • 1
    Simple and easy
CONS OF FIREBASE
  • 31
    Can become expensive
  • 16
    No open source, you depend on external company
  • 15
    Scalability is not infinite
  • 9
    Not Flexible Enough
  • 7
    Cant filter queries
  • 3
    Very unstable server
  • 3
    No Relational Data
  • 2
    Too many errors
  • 2
    No offline sync

related Firebase posts

Johnny Bell

I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

See more
Collins Ogbuzuru
Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 19 upvotes · 17.8K views

Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

See more
Keycloak logo

Keycloak

715
1.3K
102
An open source identity and access management solution
715
1.3K
+ 1
102
PROS OF KEYCLOAK
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
  • 6
    Maintained by devs at Redhat
CONS OF KEYCLOAK
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side

related Keycloak posts

Shared insights
on
OktaOktaKeycloakKeycloakGitHubGitHub

Hello,

I'm trying to implement a solution for this situation:

There is a restaurant in which users can access RestAPI, using Google, Facebook, GitHub. There is even the possibility to login inside using the SPID authentication. In the first case I was considering Keycloak as a better solution for this case, but then i've read about Okta and its pros.

I cannot understand reading and searching on Google if SPID authentication is supported by OKTA. Looks like to be, because it should be using SAML, but I haven't found a clear solution.

See more
Joshua Dean Küpper
CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 7 upvotes · 802.3K views

As the access to our global REST-API "Charon" is bound to OAuth2, we use Keycloak inside Quarkus to authenticate and authorize users of our API. It is not possible to perform any un-authenticated requests against this API, so we wanted to make really sure that the authentication/authorization component is absolutely reliable and tested. We found those attributes within Keycloak, so we used it.

See more
OAuth.io logo

OAuth.io

21
145
12
OAuth That Just Works
21
145
+ 1
12
PROS OF OAUTH.IO
  • 4
    SDK's
  • 3
    Integration with 100+ Providers
  • 1
    Useful screenshots
  • 1
    Add your own provider
  • 1
    Core oauthd open source
  • 1
    Extreme simplicity
  • 1
    Heroku add-on
CONS OF OAUTH.IO
    Be the first to leave a con

    related OAuth.io posts

    Gabriel Pa
    Shared insights
    on
    OAuth.ioOAuth.ioFirebaseFirebase
    at

    Created our own OAuth.io UTH service and migrated away from Google Firebase Authentication. It caused us a lot of problems. We had false positives, slow speeds when sharing tokens between applications and deleting a user fails and returns void so you have to recheck to see if the save was successful or not

    See more

    GraphQL Java IntelliJ IDEA JavaScript Node.js Hubot Git GitHub Vue.js ExpressJS OAuth.io Angular 2 Docker Kibana

    See more
    Passport logo

    Passport

    350
    366
    0
    Simple, unobtrusive authentication for Node.js
    350
    366
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF PASSPORT
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF PASSPORT
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Passport posts

        Repost

        Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku . However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

        Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

        Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

        Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

        See more

        Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku. However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

        Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

        Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

        Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

        See more
        OneLogin logo

        OneLogin

        92
        183
        6
        On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more
        92
        183
        + 1
        6
        PROS OF ONELOGIN
        • 2
          SAML
        • 1
          Great Customer Support
        • 1
          Easy setup
        • 1
          REST API
        • 1
          Directory synchronization
        CONS OF ONELOGIN
          Be the first to leave a con

          related OneLogin posts

          I would like to enable SSO with Magento 2.

          What do you recommend OneLogin or SimpleSAMLphp?

          See more