Alternatives to Zulip logo

Alternatives to Zulip

Slack, RocketChat, Mattermost, Discord, and Riot are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Zulip.
217
340
+ 1
358

What is Zulip and what are its top alternatives?

Zulip is a powerful open-source team chat platform that organizes conversations into streams and topics, making it easier to keep track of ongoing discussions. Key features include real-time messaging, threaded conversations, rich content support, and integrations with popular tools like GitHub and Jira. However, Zulip's interface may feel overwhelming for new users, and some users may find the learning curve steep.

  1. Slack: Slack is a widely-used team communication tool known for its user-friendly interface, extensive integrations, and customizable settings. Pros include a large user base, seamless collaboration features, and a robust app ecosystem. Cons may include its pricing structure for premium features compared to Zulip.
  2. Microsoft Teams: Microsoft Teams is another popular team chat platform that offers similar features to Zulip, such as real-time messaging, file sharing, and integration with Microsoft 365 tools. Pros include tight integration with Microsoft products, while cons may include a less intuitive interface for some users.
  3. Discord: Discord is a chat platform originally designed for gamers but has expanded to cater to various communities. Key features include voice chat, instant messaging, and extensive moderation tools. Pros include a user-friendly interface and robust community management tools, but cons may include limited integration options compared to Zulip.
  4. Rocket.Chat: Rocket.Chat is an open-source team chat platform that offers features like real-time messaging, video conferencing, and file sharing. Pros include self-hosting capabilities, extensive customization options, and a growing community of developers. Cons may include a steeper learning curve for less tech-savvy users compared to Zulip.
  5. Mattermost: Mattermost is an open-source team chat platform that emphasizes security and compliance with features like end-to-end encryption and customizable data retention policies. Pros include self-hosting options, extensive integrations, and a strong focus on data privacy. Cons may include a less polished user interface compared to Zulip.
  6. Flock: Flock is a team communication and collaboration platform that offers features like shared to-dos, video conferencing, and integration with popular productivity tools. Pros include a simple and intuitive interface, extensive collaboration features, and competitive pricing. Cons may include fewer customization options compared to Zulip.
  7. Wire: Wire is a team chat platform that prioritizes security with end-to-end encryption and GDPR compliance. Key features include secure messaging, video calls, and file sharing. Pros include strong security measures, a modern interface, and cross-platform compatibility. Cons may include a smaller user base compared to Zulip.
  8. Tox: Tox is a decentralized and encrypted chat platform that prioritizes user privacy with features like end-to-end encryption and peer-to-peer communication. Pros include a strong focus on security and privacy, no central servers, and cross-platform compatibility. Cons may include a lack of mainstream integrations compared to Zulip.
  9. Ryver: Ryver is a team communication platform that combines chat, task management, and workflow automation in one tool. Pros include a unified platform for communication and collaboration, integrated task management features, and competitive pricing. Cons may include a less extensive integration ecosystem compared to Zulip.
  10. Ripcord: Ripcord is a chat platform designed for power users with features like customizable themes, extensive keyboard shortcuts, and low system resource usage. Pros include a lightweight and fast interface, extensive customization options, and low resource consumption. Cons may include a lack of some advanced collaboration features found in Zulip.

Top Alternatives to Zulip

  • Slack
    Slack

    Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together. ...

  • RocketChat
    RocketChat

    Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms. ...

  • Mattermost
    Mattermost

    Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

  • Discord
    Discord

    Discord is a modern free voice & text chat app for groups of gamers. Our resilient Erlang backend running on the cloud has built in DDoS protection with automatic server failover. ...

  • Riot
    Riot

    Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve. ...

  • Rocket
    Rocket

    Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code. ...

  • Twist
    Twist

    Twist is a communication app for teams who believe there’s more to work than keeping up with group chat apps, created by the makers of Todoist. ...

  • Discourse
    Discourse

    Discourse is a simple, flat forum, where replies flow down the page in a line. Replies are attached to the bottom and top of each post, so you can optionally expand the context of the conversation – without breaking your flow. ...

Zulip alternatives & related posts

Slack logo

Slack

118.2K
94.9K
6K
Bring all your communication together in one place
118.2K
94.9K
+ 1
6K
PROS OF SLACK
  • 1.2K
    Easy to integrate with
  • 876
    Excellent interface on multiple platforms
  • 849
    Free
  • 694
    Mobile friendly
  • 690
    People really enjoy using it
  • 331
    Great integrations
  • 315
    Flexible notification preferences
  • 198
    Unlimited users
  • 184
    Strong search and data archiving
  • 155
    Multi domain switching support
  • 82
    Easy to use
  • 40
    Beautiful
  • 27
    Hubot support
  • 22
    Unread/read control
  • 21
    Slackbot
  • 19
    Permalink for each messages
  • 17
    Text snippet with highlighting
  • 15
    Quote message easily
  • 14
    Per-room notification
  • 13
    Awesome integration support
  • 12
    Star for each message / attached files
  • 12
    IRC gateway
  • 11
    Good communication within a team
  • 11
    Dropbox Integration
  • 10
    Slick, search is great
  • 10
    Jira Integration
  • 9
    New Relic Integration
  • 8
    Great communication tool
  • 8
    Combine All Services Quickly
  • 8
    Asana Integration
  • 7
    This tool understands developers
  • 7
    XMPP gateway
  • 7
    Google Drive Integration
  • 7
    Awesomeness
  • 6
    Replaces email
  • 6
    Twitter Integration
  • 6
    Google Docs Integration
  • 6
    BitBucket integration
  • 5
    Jenkins Integration
  • 5
    GREAT Customer Support / Quick Response to Feedback
  • 5
    Guest and Restricted user control
  • 4
    Clean UI
  • 4
    Excellent multi platform internal communication tool
  • 4
    GitHub integration
  • 4
    Mention list view
  • 4
    Gathers all my communications in one place
  • 3
    Perfect implementation of chat + integrations
  • 3
    Easy
  • 3
    Easy to add a reaction
  • 3
    Timely while non intrusive
  • 3
    Great on-boarding
  • 3
    Threaded chat
  • 3
    Visual Studio Integration
  • 3
    Easy to start working with
  • 3
    Android app
  • 2
    Simplicity
  • 2
    Message Actions
  • 2
    It's basically an improved (although closed) IRC
  • 2
    So much better than email
  • 2
    Eases collaboration for geographically dispersed teams
  • 2
    Great interface
  • 2
    Great Channel Customization
  • 2
    Markdown
  • 2
    Intuitive, easy to use, great integrations
  • 1
    Great Support Team
  • 1
    Watch
  • 1
    Multi work-space support
  • 1
    Flexible and Accessible
  • 1
    Better User Experience
  • 1
    Archive Importing
  • 1
    Travis CI integration
  • 1
    It's the coolest IM ever
  • 1
    Community
  • 1
    Great API
  • 1
    Easy remote communication
  • 1
    Get less busy
  • 1
    API
  • 1
    Zapier integration
  • 1
    Targetprocess integration
  • 1
    Finally with terrible "threading"—I miss Flowdock
  • 1
    Complete with plenty of Electron BLOAT
  • 1
    I was 666 star :D
  • 1
    Dev communication Made Easy
  • 1
    Integrates with just about everything
  • 1
    Very customizable
  • 0
    Platforms
  • 0
    Easy to useL
CONS OF SLACK
  • 13
    Can be distracting depending on how you use it
  • 6
    Requires some management for large teams
  • 6
    Limit messages history
  • 5
    Too expensive
  • 5
    You don't really own your messages
  • 4
    Too many notifications by default

related Slack posts

Shared insights
on
GitHubGitHubSlackSlack

We're using GitHub for version control as it's an industry standard for version control and our team has plenty of experience using it. We also found many features such as issues and project help us organize. We also really liked the fact that it has the Actions CI platform built in because it allows us to keep more of our development in one place. We chose Slack as our main communication platform because it allows us to organize our communication streams into various channels for specific topics. Additionally, we really liked the integrations as they allow us to keep a lot of our in formation in one place rather than spread around many different apps.

See more
Lucas Litton
Founder & CEO at Macombey · | 24 upvotes · 278.3K views

Sentry has been essential to our development approach. Nobody likes errors or apps that crash. We use Sentry heavily during Node.js and React development. Our developers are able to see error reports, crashes, user's browsers, and more, all in one place. Sentry also seamlessly integrates with Asana, Slack, and GitHub.

See more
RocketChat logo

RocketChat

372
540
324
Open source slack alternative
372
540
+ 1
324
PROS OF ROCKETCHAT
  • 72
    Open source
  • 38
    Can be deployed on premise
  • 32
    Byos (bring your own server)
  • 30
    Faster than Slack
  • 21
    Mobile app for iphone, ipad, and ipod touch
  • 19
    Built using meteor
  • 19
    Desktop client for mac and windows
  • 13
    Easily deployed on Cloud Services (Heroku, etc)
  • 10
    Screen Sharing
  • 9
    Video and audio
  • 9
    Excellent support & service, bar-none
  • 6
    Web client
  • 5
    Amazing product, fast moving development, and BYOS
  • 5
    Multiple Security integrations - LDAP etc
  • 5
    Docker Image for easy setup
  • 5
    Open source
  • 5
    Mobile app for android phone, tablet, and tv stick
  • 4
    Datacontrol
  • 4
    Great development team
  • 4
    Free
  • 2
    Love it - running on R Pi 2
  • 2
    Open source server
  • 1
    Broadcast & Readonly channels
  • 1
    Slack bridge
  • 1
    Linux Client Support
  • 1
    Flexible Integrations
  • 1
    Ldap integration
  • 0
    Threading model
CONS OF ROCKETCHAT
  • 1
    No full markdown support
  • 1
    Mobile app in Enterprise version only
  • 1
    Many basic features require plugins
  • 1
    Visioconference support is external
  • 1
    No screen recorder
  • 1
    Few options for user customization
  • 1
    Limited message history on SaaS
  • 1
    Poor user customization
  • 1
    Hard to upgrade
  • 1
    Not as well-known as others like it

related RocketChat posts

rishig
Head of Product at Zulip · | 5 upvotes · 155.7K views

I use Zulip instead of Slack, Mattermost, or RocketChat because of its first class threading. One week after switching to Gmail (in 2004) I realized I was never (willingly) going to use an unthreaded email product again. I had that same experience the first time I saw Zulip.

Zulip is also fully open-source, with a well-maintained (e.g. 90+% test coverage, fully static python), easily extensible code-base. In many companies, your communication platform (chat or email) is the center of the workplace -- no one asks for a chat integration into their calendar, they ask for a calendar integration into their chat. A fully open-source codebase means you can customize Zulip to your needs, and are never at the whim of a corporate maintainer who can't or won't fix simple bugs, or who will charge you tens of thousands of dollars for making minor customizations.

See more
Pradeep Sreeram
Shared insights
on
MattermostMattermostRocketChatRocketChat

We need to develop a social media like chat in which users can message each other or create a channel. We are planning to use RocketChat or Mattermost under the hood to develop a custom UI. How do notifications work in that case? Has anyone done it? Or is there any better way to implement it.

See more
Mattermost logo

Mattermost

481
577
302
Open-source, self-hosted, Slack alternative
481
577
+ 1
302
PROS OF MATTERMOST
  • 60
    Open source
  • 41
    On-premise deployment
  • 26
    Free
  • 22
    Built using golang
  • 21
    Fast and easy to use
  • 14
    Docker image provided for easy setup
  • 14
    Full text search
  • 12
    Built using react
  • 11
    Supports multiple teams
  • 11
    Search and data archiving
  • 11
    Very professional
  • 8
    Keeps us focused, effective, concise
  • 7
    Clean and simple look
  • 7
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 7
    Webhooks support
  • 6
    Well documented
  • 6
    Use #Hashtags like Twitter
  • 3
    Import Slack logs
  • 3
    Reactive community and ease of use
  • 2
    Self managed data
  • 2
    On-premises Deployment
  • 2
    Secure
  • 1
    Markdown support
  • 1
    On premise installation
  • 1
    Kanban
  • 1
    Checklists
  • 1
    Slack-compatible integrations
  • 1
    Easy webhook integration
CONS OF MATTERMOST
  • 2
    Less integrations and plugins than slack
  • 2
    Many basic features are enterprise only
  • 2
    Custom sidewide themes only in enterprise
  • 1
    Basic permissions only in enterprise edition
  • 1
    Not compatible with Telegram keys, which used by FSB

related Mattermost posts

Mark Nelissen

I use Slack because it offers the best experience, even on the free tier (which we're still using). As a comparison, I have had in depth experience with HipChat, Stride, Skype, Google Chat (the new service), Google Hangouts (the old service). For self hosted, Mattermost is open source and claims to support most Slack integrations, but I have not extensively investigated this claim.

See more
rishig
Head of Product at Zulip · | 5 upvotes · 155.7K views

I use Zulip instead of Slack, Mattermost, or RocketChat because of its first class threading. One week after switching to Gmail (in 2004) I realized I was never (willingly) going to use an unthreaded email product again. I had that same experience the first time I saw Zulip.

Zulip is also fully open-source, with a well-maintained (e.g. 90+% test coverage, fully static python), easily extensible code-base. In many companies, your communication platform (chat or email) is the center of the workplace -- no one asks for a chat integration into their calendar, they ask for a calendar integration into their chat. A fully open-source codebase means you can customize Zulip to your needs, and are never at the whim of a corporate maintainer who can't or won't fix simple bugs, or who will charge you tens of thousands of dollars for making minor customizations.

See more
Discord logo

Discord

1.7K
1.5K
806
All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers that’s free, secure, and works on both your desktop and phone
1.7K
1.5K
+ 1
806
PROS OF DISCORD
  • 65
    Unlimited Users
  • 59
    Unlimited Channels
  • 55
    Easy to use
  • 51
    Voice Chat
  • 49
    Fast and easy set-ups and connections
  • 46
    Clean UI
  • 43
    Mobile Friendly
  • 43
    Free
  • 33
    Android App
  • 29
    Mention system
  • 27
    Customizable notifications on per channel basis
  • 26
    Customizable ranks/permissions
  • 22
    IOS app
  • 21
    Good code embedding
  • 19
    Vast Webhook Support
  • 16
    Dark mode
  • 14
    Easy context switching between work and home
  • 14
    Roles
  • 13
    Great Communities
  • 12
    Very Resource Friendly
  • 12
    Robust
  • 12
    Easy to develop for
  • 12
    Great Customer Support
  • 12
    Bot control
  • 11
    Video Call Conference
  • 11
    Video call meeting
  • 10
    Able to hold 99 people in one call
  • 10
    Sharing screen layer
  • 9
    Easy
  • 9
    Great browser experience
  • 9
    Shares screen with other member
  • 9
    Easy Server Setup and joining system
  • 7
    Lower bandwidth requirements than competitors
  • 7
    Easy to code bots for
  • 6
    Noice
  • 3
    Easily set up custom emoji
CONS OF DISCORD
  • 10
    Not as many integrations as Slack
  • 9
    For gamers
  • 5
    Limited file size
  • 4
    Sends data to US Gov
  • 4
    For everyone
  • 2
    Undescriptive in global ban reasons
  • 2
    Suspected Pedophiles in few servers
  • 1
    Unsupportive Support
  • 1
    High memory and CPU footprint

related Discord posts

Josh Dzielak
Co-Founder & CTO at Orbit · | 19 upvotes · 429.3K views

Shortly after I joined Algolia as a developer advocate, I knew I wanted to establish a place for the community to congregate and share their projects, questions and advice. There are a ton of platforms out there that can be used to host communities, and they tend to fall into two categories - real-time sync (like chat) and async (like forums). Because the community was already large, I felt that a chat platform like Discord or Gitter might be overwhelming and opted for a forum-like solution instead (which would also create content that's searchable from Google).

I looked at paid, closed-source options like AnswerHub and ForumBee and old-school solutions like phpBB and vBulletin, but none seemed to offer the power, flexibility and developer-friendliness of Discourse. Discourse is open source, written in Rails with Ember.js on the front-end. That made me confident I could modify it to meet our exact needs. Discourse's own forum is very active which made me confident I could get help if I needed it.

It took about a month to get Discourse up-and-running and make authentication tied to algolia.com via the SSO plugin. Adding additional plugins for moderation or look-and-feel customization was fairly straightforward, and I even created a plugin to make the forum content searchable with Algolia. To stay on top of answering questions and moderation, we used the Discourse API to publish new messages into our Slack. All-in-all I would say we were happy with Discourse - the only caveat would be that it's very helpful to have technical knowledge as well as Rails knowledge in order to get the most out of it.

See more

From a StackShare Community member: “We’re about to start a chat group for our open source project (over 5K stars on GitHub) so we can let our community collaborate more closely. The obvious choice would be Slack (k8s and a ton of major projects use it), but we’ve seen Gitter (webpack uses it) for a lot of open source projects, Discord (Vue.js moved to them), and as of late I’m seeing Spectrum more and more often. Does anyone have experience with these or other alternatives? Is it even worth assessing all these options, or should we just go with Slack? Some things that are important to us: free, all the regular integrations (GitHub, Heroku, etc), mobile & desktop apps, and open source is of course a plus."

See more
Riot logo

Riot

114
100
68
Simple and elegant component-based UI library
114
100
+ 1
68
PROS OF RIOT
  • 13
    Its just easy... no training wheels needed
  • 13
    Light weight. Fast. Clear
  • 11
    Very simple, fast
  • 9
    Straightforward
  • 6
    Minimalistic
  • 4
    Great documentation
  • 4
    Simpler semantics than other frameworks
  • 3
    Easier than playing Teemo
  • 2
    Great engineering
  • 2
    Light, flexible and library friendly
  • 1
    Mastered under an hour
CONS OF RIOT
  • 1
    Smaller community

related Riot posts

Rocket logo

Rocket

90
171
11
Web Framework for Rust
90
171
+ 1
11
PROS OF ROCKET
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Uses all the rust features extensively
  • 1
    Django analog in rust
  • 1
    Inbuilt templating feature
  • 1
    Provides nice abstractions
CONS OF ROCKET
  • 1
    Only runs in nightly

related Rocket posts

Twist logo

Twist

30
31
0
Slack without the annoying distractions
30
31
+ 1
0
PROS OF TWIST
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF TWIST
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Twist posts

      Francisco Quintero
      Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 7 upvotes · 459.6K views

      For many(if not all) small and medium size business time and cost matter a lot.

      That's why languages, frameworks, tools, and services that are easy to use and provide 0 to productive in less time, it's best.

      Maybe Node.js frameworks might provide better features compared to Rails but in terms of MVPs, for us Rails is the leading alternative.

      Amazon EC2 might be cheaper and more customizable than Heroku but in the initial terms of a project, you need to complete configurationos and deploy early.

      Advanced configurations can be done down the road, when the project is running and making money, not before.

      But moving fast isn't the only thing we care about. We also take the job to leave a good codebase from the beginning and because of that we try to follow, as much as we can, style guides in Ruby with RuboCop and in JavaScript with ESLint and StandardJS.

      Finally, comunication and keeping a good history of conversations, decisions, and discussions is important so we use a mix of Slack and Twist

      See more
      Discourse logo

      Discourse

      274
      242
      115
      The 100% open source, next-generation discussion platform built for the next decade of the Internet.
      274
      242
      + 1
      115
      PROS OF DISCOURSE
      • 28
        Open source
      • 19
        Fast
      • 13
        Email digests
      • 9
        Better than a stereotypical forum
      • 8
        Perfect for communities of any size
      • 7
        It's perfect to build real communities
      • 7
        Made by same folks from stackoverflow
      • 7
        Built with Ember.js
      • 6
        Great customer support
      • 3
        Made by consolidated team with a working business
      • 3
        Translated into a lot of Languages
      • 3
        Configurations
      • 2
        Easy flag resolution
      CONS OF DISCOURSE
      • 3
        Heavy on server
      • 2
        Difficult to extend
      • 2
        Notifications aren't great on mobile due to being a PWA

      related Discourse posts

      Josh Dzielak
      Co-Founder & CTO at Orbit · | 19 upvotes · 429.3K views

      Shortly after I joined Algolia as a developer advocate, I knew I wanted to establish a place for the community to congregate and share their projects, questions and advice. There are a ton of platforms out there that can be used to host communities, and they tend to fall into two categories - real-time sync (like chat) and async (like forums). Because the community was already large, I felt that a chat platform like Discord or Gitter might be overwhelming and opted for a forum-like solution instead (which would also create content that's searchable from Google).

      I looked at paid, closed-source options like AnswerHub and ForumBee and old-school solutions like phpBB and vBulletin, but none seemed to offer the power, flexibility and developer-friendliness of Discourse. Discourse is open source, written in Rails with Ember.js on the front-end. That made me confident I could modify it to meet our exact needs. Discourse's own forum is very active which made me confident I could get help if I needed it.

      It took about a month to get Discourse up-and-running and make authentication tied to algolia.com via the SSO plugin. Adding additional plugins for moderation or look-and-feel customization was fairly straightforward, and I even created a plugin to make the forum content searchable with Algolia. To stay on top of answering questions and moderation, we used the Discourse API to publish new messages into our Slack. All-in-all I would say we were happy with Discourse - the only caveat would be that it's very helpful to have technical knowledge as well as Rails knowledge in order to get the most out of it.

      See more