Alternatives to Wufoo logo

Alternatives to Wufoo

Formstack, Typeform, Jotform, SurveyMonkey, and Google Forms are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Wufoo.
35
40
+ 1
4

What is Wufoo and what are its top alternatives?

Wufoo is an online form builder that allows users to create customized forms for various purposes such as surveys, registrations, and event RSVPs. Some key features of Wufoo include easy drag-and-drop form creation, customizable themes, and built-in analytics to track form submissions. However, limitations of Wufoo include the lack of advanced customization options and limited integration capabilities with other tools.

  1. Google Forms: Google Forms is a free form builder tool that offers seamless integration with Google Drive and other Google services. It allows users to create various types of forms and surveys with simple customization options. The key advantage of Google Forms is its integration capabilities with other Google services, but it may lack advanced features compared to Wufoo.

  2. Typeform: Typeform is a modern form builder that focuses on creating interactive and engaging forms. It offers a wide range of question types and customizable themes to create unique forms. The pros of Typeform include its attractive design options and user-friendly interface, but it may come with higher pricing plans compared to Wufoo.

  3. JotForm: JotForm is a versatile form builder that provides a variety of templates and integrations for creating customized forms. It offers advanced features such as conditional logic and payment processing options. The advantage of JotForm is its flexibility in form creation, but it may have a steeper learning curve compared to Wufoo.

  4. Formstack: Formstack is a comprehensive form builder tool that focuses on data collection and analysis. It offers advanced features such as reporting tools, workflow automation, and integrations with various third-party applications. The pros of Formstack include its robust analytics capabilities, but it may be more suited for complex form requirements compared to Wufoo.

  5. SurveyMonkey: SurveyMonkey is a popular survey tool that also offers form-building capabilities. It provides a wide range of survey templates and question types to create detailed forms and surveys. The advantage of SurveyMonkey is its focus on surveys and data analysis, but it may lack customization options compared to Wufoo.

  6. Formsite: Formsite is a versatile form builder that offers advanced features such as conditional logic, payment processing, and reporting tools. It provides customizable themes and templates to create professional-looking forms. The pros of Formsite include its robust features for data collection, but it may have limitations in terms of design flexibility compared to Wufoo.

  7. Cognito Forms: Cognito Forms is a user-friendly form builder that focuses on creating complex and interactive forms. It offers features such as calculations, repeating sections, and responsive design for creating dynamic forms. The advantage of Cognito Forms is its advanced functionalities for complex form requirements, but it may have a slightly higher learning curve compared to Wufoo.

  8. 123FormBuilder: 123FormBuilder is a versatile form builder tool that provides various customization options for creating forms and surveys. It offers features such as conditional logic, approval workflows, and integrations with third-party apps. The pros of 123FormBuilder include its flexibility in form creation, but it may have limited design options compared to Wufoo.

  9. FormAssembly: FormAssembly is a secure form builder tool that focuses on data privacy and compliance. It offers advanced features such as encryption, HIPAA compliance, and Salesforce integration for creating secure forms. The advantage of FormAssembly is its focus on data security and compliance, but it may come with higher pricing plans compared to Wufoo.

  10. Paperform: Paperform is a modern form builder that allows users to create interactive forms with a focus on visual design. It offers features such as conditional logic, payment processing, and integration with various tools. The pros of Paperform include its intuitive interface and attractive design options, but it may have limitations in terms of customization compared to Wufoo.

Top Alternatives to Wufoo

  • Formstack
    Formstack

    Formstack is an online form building application that lets you bring your forms online without any coding knowledge. The Formstack drag and drop form builder lets you build custom forms and easily collect data in your Formstack database. ...

  • Typeform
    Typeform

    Build beautiful and engaging next-generation online forms, surveys, quizzes, landing pages, and much more with Typeform ...

  • Jotform
    Jotform

    It is a powerful online application that allows anyone to quickly create custom online forms. It creates forms with a drag and drop creation tool and an option to encrypt user data. ...

  • SurveyMonkey
    SurveyMonkey

    It is an online service offers you all the tools you need to quickly create a survey, distribute it to a targeted audience such as existing or potential customers, and examine the survey results. ...

  • Google Forms
    Google Forms

    It is a cloud-based questionnaire and survey solution with real-time collaboration and powerful tools to customize form questions. It can also be used to create online quizzes. ...

  • Gravity Forms
    Gravity Forms

    It is a WordPress plugin used originally for contact forms, but in a more general sense, it allows site owners to create forms to collect information. It can be used for contact forms, WordPress post creation, calculators, employment applications and more. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

Wufoo alternatives & related posts

Formstack logo

Formstack

28
0
Customize, brand & launch an online form in seconds.
28
0
PROS OF FORMSTACK
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF FORMSTACK
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Formstack posts

      Typeform logo

      Typeform

      336
      43
      Forms & surveys for the people
      336
      43
      PROS OF TYPEFORM
      • 13
        Beautiful UI
      • 8
        Free
      • 7
        Conversational template questions
      • 5
        Embeddable
      • 2
        Slick transitions between questions
      • 2
        Analytics
      • 2
        Stripe integration
      • 2
        Very easy to use
      • 1
        Conversational
      • 1
        Makes me look good
      CONS OF TYPEFORM
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Typeform posts

        Jotform logo

        Jotform

        57
        2
        Helps you create online forms and collect data
        57
        2
        PROS OF JOTFORM
        • 1
          Fast and Flexible
        • 1
          Huge Community
        CONS OF JOTFORM
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Jotform posts

          We're looking for a better way to gather complex data from our members and provide visualisations in a PDF report or online dashboard. Currently, we use Stacker to collect data, Airtable to store it, and PowerBI Desktop to build reports.

          The data we collect is greenhouse gas emissions data, including several years of utility data, vehicle consumption data, waste production, paper consumption, and so on. Hundreds of possible data points for each member with a large degree of variation and dependency within those data points. One member might have a fleet of a hundred vehicles, and we need to know the make/model/year/fuel type of each one, plus the actual fuel consumption, while another member doesn't have any fleet emissions, but produces a large amount of refrigerants, and so on.

          Stacker does not give us the dynamic flexibility we need for this ingestion project. Airtable Interfaces could potentially get us there, but we're not sure if it is as sophisticated as we need it to be especially with all the conditionals. We haven't explored Jotform or Appscript or other options yet.

          Thanks!

          See more
          SurveyMonkey logo

          SurveyMonkey

          61
          0
          A web-based survey solutions
          61
          0
          PROS OF SURVEYMONKEY
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF SURVEYMONKEY
              Be the first to leave a con

              related SurveyMonkey posts

              We are looking to launch our first NPS Survey. Any recommendations on a good place to start? Tools in considering are Delighted or SurveyMonkey. Preferably link the analytics with Marketo.

              See more
              Google Forms logo

              Google Forms

              89
              0
              A survey administration app
              89
              0
              PROS OF GOOGLE FORMS
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF GOOGLE FORMS
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Google Forms posts

                  Gravity Forms logo

                  Gravity Forms

                  1.9K
                  0
                  Create Advanced Forms for Your WordPress-Powered Website
                  1.9K
                  0
                  PROS OF GRAVITY FORMS
                    Be the first to leave a pro
                    CONS OF GRAVITY FORMS
                      Be the first to leave a con

                      related Gravity Forms posts

                      Postman logo

                      Postman

                      96.5K
                      1.8K
                      Only complete API development environment
                      96.5K
                      1.8K
                      PROS OF POSTMAN
                      • 490
                        Easy to use
                      • 369
                        Great tool
                      • 276
                        Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
                      • 156
                        Easy setup, looks good
                      • 144
                        The best api workflow out there
                      • 53
                        It's the best
                      • 53
                        History feature
                      • 44
                        Adds real value to my workflow
                      • 43
                        Great interface that magically predicts your needs
                      • 35
                        The best in class app
                      • 12
                        Can save and share script
                      • 10
                        Fully featured without looking cluttered
                      • 8
                        Collections
                      • 8
                        Option to run scrips
                      • 8
                        Global/Environment Variables
                      • 7
                        Shareable Collections
                      • 7
                        Dead simple and useful. Excellent
                      • 7
                        Dark theme easy on the eyes
                      • 6
                        Awesome customer support
                      • 6
                        Great integration with newman
                      • 5
                        Documentation
                      • 5
                        Simple
                      • 5
                        The test script is useful
                      • 4
                        Saves responses
                      • 4
                        This has simplified my testing significantly
                      • 4
                        Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
                      • 4
                        Easy as pie
                      • 3
                        API-network
                      • 3
                        I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
                      • 3
                        Mocking API calls with predefined response
                      • 2
                        Now supports GraphQL
                      • 2
                        Postman Runner CI Integration
                      • 2
                        Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
                      • 2
                        Continuous integration using newman
                      • 2
                        Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
                      • 2
                        Runner
                      • 2
                        Graph
                      • 1
                        <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
                      CONS OF POSTMAN
                      • 10
                        Stores credentials in HTTP
                      • 9
                        Bloated features and UI
                      • 8
                        Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
                      • 7
                        Poor GraphQL support
                      • 5
                        Expensive
                      • 3
                        Not free after 5 users
                      • 3
                        Can't prompt for per-request variables
                      • 1
                        Import swagger
                      • 1
                        Support websocket
                      • 1
                        Import curl

                      related Postman posts

                      Noah Zoschke
                      Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3.2M views

                      We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

                      Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

                      Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

                      This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

                      Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

                      Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

                      Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

                      See more
                      Simon Reymann
                      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.9M views

                      Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

                      • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
                      • npm as package manager
                      • NestJS as Node.js framework
                      • TypeScript as programming language
                      • ExpressJS as web server
                      • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
                      • Postman as a tool for API development
                      • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
                      • JSON Web Token for access token management

                      The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

                      • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
                      • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
                      • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
                      • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
                      See more
                      Postman logo

                      Postman

                      96.5K
                      1.8K
                      Only complete API development environment
                      96.5K
                      1.8K
                      PROS OF POSTMAN
                      • 490
                        Easy to use
                      • 369
                        Great tool
                      • 276
                        Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
                      • 156
                        Easy setup, looks good
                      • 144
                        The best api workflow out there
                      • 53
                        It's the best
                      • 53
                        History feature
                      • 44
                        Adds real value to my workflow
                      • 43
                        Great interface that magically predicts your needs
                      • 35
                        The best in class app
                      • 12
                        Can save and share script
                      • 10
                        Fully featured without looking cluttered
                      • 8
                        Collections
                      • 8
                        Option to run scrips
                      • 8
                        Global/Environment Variables
                      • 7
                        Shareable Collections
                      • 7
                        Dead simple and useful. Excellent
                      • 7
                        Dark theme easy on the eyes
                      • 6
                        Awesome customer support
                      • 6
                        Great integration with newman
                      • 5
                        Documentation
                      • 5
                        Simple
                      • 5
                        The test script is useful
                      • 4
                        Saves responses
                      • 4
                        This has simplified my testing significantly
                      • 4
                        Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
                      • 4
                        Easy as pie
                      • 3
                        API-network
                      • 3
                        I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
                      • 3
                        Mocking API calls with predefined response
                      • 2
                        Now supports GraphQL
                      • 2
                        Postman Runner CI Integration
                      • 2
                        Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
                      • 2
                        Continuous integration using newman
                      • 2
                        Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
                      • 2
                        Runner
                      • 2
                        Graph
                      • 1
                        <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
                      CONS OF POSTMAN
                      • 10
                        Stores credentials in HTTP
                      • 9
                        Bloated features and UI
                      • 8
                        Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
                      • 7
                        Poor GraphQL support
                      • 5
                        Expensive
                      • 3
                        Not free after 5 users
                      • 3
                        Can't prompt for per-request variables
                      • 1
                        Import swagger
                      • 1
                        Support websocket
                      • 1
                        Import curl

                      related Postman posts

                      Noah Zoschke
                      Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3.2M views

                      We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

                      Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

                      Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

                      This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

                      Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

                      Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

                      Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

                      See more
                      Simon Reymann
                      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.9M views

                      Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

                      • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
                      • npm as package manager
                      • NestJS as Node.js framework
                      • TypeScript as programming language
                      • ExpressJS as web server
                      • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
                      • Postman as a tool for API development
                      • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
                      • JSON Web Token for access token management

                      The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

                      • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
                      • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
                      • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
                      • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
                      See more