Alternatives to UI Bakery logo

Alternatives to UI Bakery

Retool, Jet Admin, Internal, ToolJet, and Appsmith are the most popular alternatives and competitors to UI Bakery.
8
0

What is UI Bakery and what are its top alternatives?

UI Bakery is a low-code development platform that allows users to quickly create web applications without extensive coding. Its key features include a drag-and-drop interface, pre-built templates, and the ability to customize app logic using visual components. However, UI Bakery may be limited in terms of advanced customization options and integrations with certain databases.

  1. Unqork: Unqork is a no-code platform that enables users to build complex, enterprise-grade applications without writing a single line of code. Key features include sophisticated backend capabilities, integrations with various systems, and robust security measures. Pros: High level of customization, scalability, and security. Cons: Steeper learning curve compared to UI Bakery.
  2. OutSystems: OutSystems is a low-code platform that empowers organizations to rapidly develop and deploy applications. Key features include visual development tools, built-in AI capabilities, and seamless integration with existing systems. Pros: Extensive library of pre-built components, scalability, and support for large-scale projects. Cons: Higher pricing compared to UI Bakery.
  3. Appian: Appian is a low-code automation platform that enables users to automate workflows and build applications with ease. Key features include drag-and-drop design, AI integration, and flexible deployment options. Pros: Powerful automation capabilities, extensive integration options, and strong analytics tools. Cons: Less user-friendly interface compared to UI Bakery.
  4. Bubble: Bubble is a visual programming platform that allows users to build web applications without code. Key features include a visual editor, responsive design tools, and a range of plugins for added functionality. Pros: Versatile design capabilities, extensive plugin library, and community support. Cons: Limited support for complex backend logic compared to UI Bakery.
  5. Mendix: Mendix is a low-code platform that enables users to quickly build and deploy multi-channel applications. Key features include visual model-driven development, built-in collaboration tools, and scalable cloud deployment options. Pros: Rapid development speed, collaborative environment, and seamless integration with enterprise systems. Cons: Limited customization options compared to UI Bakery.
  6. Zoho Creator: Zoho Creator is a low-code platform that allows users to build custom applications for their business needs. Key features include drag-and-drop interface, automated workflows, and support for mobile apps. Pros: User-friendly interface, seamless integration with Zoho's ecosystem, and affordable pricing plans. Cons: Limited scalability for enterprise-level applications compared to UI Bakery.
  7. QuickBase: QuickBase is a low-code platform that enables users to create custom applications for their business processes. Key features include customizable templates, workflow automation, and robust reporting capabilities. Pros: Flexible data management, customizable dashboards, and extensive library of integrations. Cons: Higher pricing plans compared to UI Bakery.
  8. Kintone: Kintone is a low-code platform that allows users to create custom business applications with minimal technical expertise. Key features include visual app builder, workflow automation, and collaborative tools. Pros: Rapid development speed, customizable permissions, and strong support for team collaboration. Cons: Less advanced customization options compared to UI Bakery.
  9. Microsoft PowerApps: Microsoft PowerApps is a low-code platform that enables users to build custom business applications and workflows. Key features include drag-and-drop design, AI builder, and seamless integration with Microsoft's ecosystem. Pros: Integration with Office 365, robust security features, and extensive data connectivity options. Cons: Learning curve for complex application development compared to UI Bakery.
  10. AppGyver: AppGyver is a low-code platform that allows users to build and deploy mobile and web applications. Key features include visual development tools, real-time previews, and integration with third-party services. Pros: Open-source platform, customizable components, and affordable pricing plans. Cons: Limited support for enterprise-level applications compared to UI Bakery.

Top Alternatives to UI Bakery

  • Retool
    Retool

    Retool is the fast way to build internal tools. Drag-and-drop our building blocks and connect them to your databases and APIs to build your own tools, instantly. Built by developers, for developers. Trusted by startups and Fortune 500s. ...

  • Jet Admin
    Jet Admin

    It is a no-code internal tool builder. The simple drag-and-drop interface enables anyone to create the tools they need to manage daily operations, like tracking orders, resolving issues, and monitoring payments. ...

  • Internal
    Internal

    It is an enterprise-ready app builder that includes a flexible drag-and-drop UI to build tools, powerful dev tools to connect to any API, and robust security options including permissioned data flows and SOC 2 certified cloud or on-premise hosting. ...

  • ToolJet
    ToolJet

    It is an open-source no-code framework to build and deploy internal tools quickly without much effort from the engineering teams. You can connect to your data sources such as databases ( like PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Elasticsearch, etc ), API endpoints ( ToolJet supports importing OpenAPI spec & OAuth2 authorization) and external services ( like Stripe, Slack, Google Sheets, Airtable ) and use our pre-built UI widgets to build internal tools. ...

  • Appsmith
    Appsmith

    Open source framework to build, deploy and share internal apps. Use UI widgets like tables, charts, forms, maps, and more. Easily connect to DBs like Postgres, Mongo, MySQL++ or REST API/GraphQL and use JS anywhere. ...

  • Superblocks
    Superblocks

    It is a programmable IDE for developers to build any internal app, workflow or scheduled job at a fraction of the time and cost. Save 100s of developer hours building custom internal tools. ...

  • NGINX
    NGINX

    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018. ...

  • Apache HTTP Server
    Apache HTTP Server

    The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet. ...

UI Bakery alternatives & related posts

Retool logo

Retool

172
211
0
Build custom internal tools, fast.
172
211
+ 1
0
PROS OF RETOOL
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF RETOOL
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Retool posts

      My company wants to make some relatively small, self-contained web apps to go through specific engineering analysis workflows.

      Each app would involve:

      (a) User inputs numbers and tabular data either in a table or from a csv import

      (b) App makes plots of this data

      (c) App performs calculations based on user input and outputs results as either plots or numbers or tabular data

      It seems like there must be zillions of applications where people want these things, so I want a 'low code' approach that already handles a bunch of details so we don't have to. Experience in the past with Angular has involved, in my experience, a lot of low-level coding to 'reinvent the wheel', creating capabilities (like menus to control plotting options like font size) that I'd expect to be very common.

      Specific wants:

      (a) Plotting capabilities with prebuilt convenient plotting controls

      (b) Ability to 'save' and 'load' (as in, you do the analysis and get results and want to save so that you can reopen this save environment with the data and analysis, as if you'd never closed it)

      (c) For specific components, ability to swap out the built-in components with a customized plot/widget.

      For example, with (c), we might have a situation where we do want to make a custom plot or tool, and would like to be able to drop that into the general application

      Question is - does something exist that does what I am describing? What would you recommend? On our list to check out: Microsoft PowerApps , Dash , UI Bakery, Retool , Tibco Spotfire , Outsystems, Zoho, Creatio, or any other suggestions.

      Other considerations:

      (a) How easy are these apps to maintain (i.e., do they frequently make non back compatible, breaking updates, like they do with Angular)

      (b) Need excellent security so I can deploy web apps for large companies

      (c) General ease of use (would like to be efficient with developer time).

      See more
      Mark Weeks
      Group Product Manager at ServiceTitan · | 3 upvotes · 118.6K views

      I'm standing up a web app that needs functionality, including profiles, directory, scheduling, video meeting, and payments.

      I considered Wix, but I'm not sure it will meet these needs. I'm interested in no code / low code tools in order to move quickly but struggling to navigate through all the options. Any advice on how to select no code / low code tools like Webflow, Bubble, stackbit, Retool, BaseDash, Glide , airkit, adalo, stacker, unqork, tiled, airtable, zapier, v.one, candu, bravo studio, amazon honeycode, unstack, dittofi, makerpad, softr, appsheet, etc.?

      See more
      Jet Admin logo

      Jet Admin

      2
      11
      0
      Create internal tools without engineering effort
      2
      11
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF JET ADMIN
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF JET ADMIN
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Jet Admin posts

          Internal logo

          Internal

          24
          7
          0
          Build enterprise-ready internal tools, fast
          24
          7
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF INTERNAL
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF INTERNAL
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Internal posts

              ToolJet logo

              ToolJet

              14
              35
              0
              Open-source alternative to Retool, Internal.io, etc
              14
              35
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF TOOLJET
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF TOOLJET
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related ToolJet posts

                  Appsmith logo

                  Appsmith

                  54
                  113
                  0
                  Open source framework to build powerful custom internal apps
                  54
                  113
                  + 1
                  0
                  PROS OF APPSMITH
                    Be the first to leave a pro
                    CONS OF APPSMITH
                      Be the first to leave a con

                      related Appsmith posts

                      Superblocks logo

                      Superblocks

                      7
                      20
                      0
                      IDE for Internal Apps, APIs and Cron Jobs
                      7
                      20
                      + 1
                      0
                      PROS OF SUPERBLOCKS
                        Be the first to leave a pro
                        CONS OF SUPERBLOCKS
                          Be the first to leave a con

                          related Superblocks posts

                          NGINX logo

                          NGINX

                          113.3K
                          60.9K
                          5.5K
                          A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.
                          113.3K
                          60.9K
                          + 1
                          5.5K
                          PROS OF NGINX
                          • 1.4K
                            High-performance http server
                          • 894
                            Performance
                          • 730
                            Easy to configure
                          • 607
                            Open source
                          • 530
                            Load balancer
                          • 289
                            Free
                          • 288
                            Scalability
                          • 226
                            Web server
                          • 175
                            Simplicity
                          • 136
                            Easy setup
                          • 30
                            Content caching
                          • 21
                            Web Accelerator
                          • 15
                            Capability
                          • 14
                            Fast
                          • 12
                            High-latency
                          • 12
                            Predictability
                          • 8
                            Reverse Proxy
                          • 7
                            The best of them
                          • 7
                            Supports http/2
                          • 5
                            Great Community
                          • 5
                            Lots of Modules
                          • 5
                            Enterprise version
                          • 4
                            High perfomance proxy server
                          • 3
                            Embedded Lua scripting
                          • 3
                            Streaming media delivery
                          • 3
                            Streaming media
                          • 3
                            Reversy Proxy
                          • 2
                            Blash
                          • 2
                            GRPC-Web
                          • 2
                            Lightweight
                          • 2
                            Fast and easy to set up
                          • 2
                            Slim
                          • 2
                            saltstack
                          • 1
                            Virtual hosting
                          • 1
                            Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
                          • 1
                            Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
                          • 1
                            Ingress controller
                          CONS OF NGINX
                          • 10
                            Advanced features require subscription

                          related NGINX posts

                          Simon Reymann
                          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 11.1M views

                          Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

                          • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
                          • Respectively Git as revision control system
                          • SourceTree as Git GUI
                          • Visual Studio Code as IDE
                          • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
                          • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
                          • SonarQube as quality gate
                          • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
                          • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
                          • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
                          • Heroku for deploying in test environments
                          • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
                          • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
                          • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
                          • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
                          • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

                          The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

                          • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
                          • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
                          • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
                          • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
                          • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
                          • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
                          See more
                          John-Daniel Trask
                          Co-founder & CEO at Raygun · | 19 upvotes · 285.6K views

                          We chose AWS because, at the time, it was really the only cloud provider to choose from.

                          We tend to use their basic building blocks (EC2, ELB, Amazon S3, Amazon RDS) rather than vendor specific components like databases and queuing. We deliberately decided to do this to ensure we could provide multi-cloud support or potentially move to another cloud provider if the offering was better for our customers.

                          We’ve utilized c3.large nodes for both the Node.js deployment and then for the .NET Core deployment. Both sit as backends behind an nginx instance and are managed using scaling groups in Amazon EC2 sitting behind a standard AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB).

                          While we’re satisfied with AWS, we do review our decision each year and have looked at Azure and Google Cloud offerings.

                          #CloudHosting #WebServers #CloudStorage #LoadBalancerReverseProxy

                          See more
                          Apache HTTP Server logo

                          Apache HTTP Server

                          64.4K
                          22.5K
                          1.4K
                          Open-source HTTP server for modern operating systems including UNIX and Windows
                          64.4K
                          22.5K
                          + 1
                          1.4K
                          PROS OF APACHE HTTP SERVER
                          • 479
                            Web server
                          • 305
                            Most widely-used web server
                          • 217
                            Virtual hosting
                          • 148
                            Fast
                          • 138
                            Ssl support
                          • 44
                            Since 1996
                          • 28
                            Asynchronous
                          • 5
                            Robust
                          • 4
                            Proven over many years
                          • 2
                            Mature
                          • 2
                            Perfomance
                          • 1
                            Perfect Support
                          • 0
                            Many available modules
                          • 0
                            Many available modules
                          CONS OF APACHE HTTP SERVER
                          • 4
                            Hard to set up

                          related Apache HTTP Server posts

                          Nick Rockwell
                          SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 46 upvotes · 4.1M views

                          When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

                          So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

                          React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

                          Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

                          See more
                          Tim Abbott
                          Shared insights
                          on
                          NGINXNGINXApache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server
                          at

                          We've been happy with nginx as part of our stack. As an open source web application that folks install on-premise, the configuration system for the webserver is pretty important to us. I have a few complaints (e.g. the configuration syntax for conditionals is a pain), but overall we've found it pretty easy to build a configurable set of options (see link) for how to run Zulip on nginx, both directly and with a remote reverse proxy in front of it, with a minimum of code duplication.

                          Certainly I've been a lot happier with it than I was working with Apache HTTP Server in past projects.

                          See more