Alternatives to TypeScript logo

Alternatives to TypeScript

Flow, JavaScript, Dart, Babel, and Elm are the most popular alternatives and competitors to TypeScript.
63.3K
48.9K
+ 1
463

What is TypeScript and what are its top alternatives?

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.
TypeScript is a tool in the Templating Languages & Extensions category of a tech stack.
TypeScript is an open source tool with 80.7K GitHub stars and 10.5K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to TypeScript's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to TypeScript

  • Flow
    Flow

    Flow is an online collaboration platform that makes it easy for people to create, organize, discuss, and accomplish tasks with anyone, anytime, anywhere. By merging a sleek, intuitive interface with powerful functionality, we're out to revolutionize the way the world's productive teams get things done. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Dart
    Dart

    Dart is a cohesive, scalable platform for building apps that run on the web (where you can use Polymer) or on servers (such as with Google Cloud Platform). Use the Dart language, libraries, and tools to write anything from simple scripts to full-featured apps. ...

  • Babel
    Babel

    Babel will turn your ES6+ code into ES5 friendly code, so you can start using it right now without waiting for browser support. ...

  • Elm
    Elm

    Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code. ...

  • ES6
    ES6

    Goals for ECMAScript 2015 include providing better support for large applications, library creation, and for use of ECMAScript as a compilation target for other languages. Some of its major enhancements include modules, class declarations, lexical block scoping, iterators and generators, promises for asynchronous programming, destructuring patterns, and proper tail calls. ...

  • CoffeeScript
    CoffeeScript

    It adds syntactic sugar inspired by Ruby, Python and Haskell in an effort to enhance JavaScript's brevity and readability. Specific additional features include list comprehension and de-structuring assignment. ...

  • Java
    Java

    Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere! ...

TypeScript alternatives & related posts

Flow logo

Flow

43
56
15
Simple project and task management for busy teams
43
56
+ 1
15
PROS OF FLOW
  • 6
    Great for collaboration
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Free
CONS OF FLOW
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Flow posts

    JavaScript logo

    JavaScript

    253.5K
    199.3K
    7.8K
    Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
    253.5K
    199.3K
    + 1
    7.8K
    PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
    • 1.6K
      Can be used on frontend/backend
    • 1.5K
      It's everywhere
    • 1.1K
      Lots of great frameworks
    • 886
      Fast
    • 735
      Light weight
    • 416
      Flexible
    • 385
      You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
    • 284
      Non-blocking i/o
    • 233
      Ubiquitousness
    • 188
      Expressive
    • 51
      Extended functionality to web pages
    • 44
      Relatively easy language
    • 42
      Executed on the client side
    • 26
      Relatively fast to the end user
    • 22
      Pure Javascript
    • 17
      Functional programming
    • 11
      Async
    • 8
      Setup is easy
    • 7
      Its everywhere
    • 7
      Because I love functions
    • 7
      JavaScript is the New PHP
    • 7
      Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
    • 7
      Full-stack
    • 6
      Expansive community
    • 6
      Future Language of The Web
    • 6
      Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
    • 5
      Evolution of C
    • 5
      Everyone use it
    • 5
      Love-hate relationship
    • 5
      Easy to hire developers
    • 5
      Supports lambdas and closures
    • 5
      Agile, packages simple to use
    • 5
      Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
    • 5
      For the good parts
    • 4
      Function expressions are useful for callbacks
    • 4
      Everywhere
    • 4
      Hard not to use
    • 4
      Promise relationship
    • 4
      Scope manipulation
    • 4
      It's fun
    • 4
      Client processing
    • 4
      Nice
    • 4
      Easy to make something
    • 4
      Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
    • 4
      Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
    • 4
      Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
    • 4
      Most Popular Language in the World
    • 4
      1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
    • 4
      Stockholm Syndrome
    • 4
      What to add
    • 4
      Clojurescript
    • 4
      No need to use PHP
    • 4
      Its fun and fast
    • 4
      Powerful
    • 4
      Versitile
    • 4
      Easy
    • 4
      It let's me use Babel & Typescript
    • 4
      Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
    • 3
      Only Programming language on browser
    • 3
      Because it is so simple and lightweight
    • 2
      JavaScript j.s
    • 2
      Acoperișul 0757604335
    • 0
      Easy to understand
    CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
    • 21
      A constant moving target, too much churn
    • 20
      Horribly inconsistent
    • 14
      Javascript is the New PHP
    • 8
      No ability to monitor memory utilitization
    • 6
      Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
    • 5
      Can be ugly
    • 4
      Thinks strange results are better than errors
    • 2
      No GitHub
    • 1
      Slow

    related JavaScript posts

    Zach Holman

    Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

    But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

    But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

    Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

    See more
    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 40 upvotes · 4.8M views

    How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

    Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

    Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

    https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

    (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

    Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

    See more
    Dart logo

    Dart

    2.7K
    2.9K
    434
    A new web programming language with libraries, a virtual machine, and tools
    2.7K
    2.9K
    + 1
    434
    PROS OF DART
    • 55
      Backed by Google
    • 49
      Flutter
    • 39
      Twice the speed of Javascript
    • 34
      Great tools
    • 30
      Scalable
    • 26
      Open source
    • 24
      Made for the future
    • 24
      Can be used on Frontend
    • 22
      Polymer Dart
    • 22
      Angular Dart
    • 17
      Cross platform
    • 16
      Like Java
    • 13
      Dartanalyzer
    • 13
      Easy to learn
    • 12
      Runs on Google Cloud Platform
    • 9
      Easy to Understand
    • 9
      Amazing concurrency primitives
    • 8
      Is to JS what C is to ASM
    • 6
      Flutter works with darts
    • 3
      R
    • 3
      Can run Dart in AWS Lambda
    CONS OF DART
    • 3
      Lack of ORM
    • 3
      Locked in - JS or TS interop is very hard to accomplish
    • 0
      A

    related Dart posts

    Shared insights
    on
    DartDartFlutterFlutter

    Hi, I'm considering building a social marketplace app on android, ios and web, Flutter seems to be a good UI framework for cross-platform apps, it's safe type, hot reload, and native compiling on native machine code (thanks to Dart). My question is, for an MVP product is it a good choice? if yes, will it be on the mid-term, long term? Or will I have to change as the users grow?

    thank you

    See more
    Gustavo Muñoz
    Senior Software Engineer at JOOR · | 8 upvotes · 398K views

    In my modest opinion, Flutter is the future of mobile development. The framework is as important to mobile as React is to the web. And seeing that React Native does not finish taking off, I am focusing all my efforts on learning Flutter and Dart. The ecosystem is amazing. The community is crazy about Flutter. There are enough resources to learn and enjoy the framework, and the tools developed to work with it are amazing. Android Studio or Visual Studio Code has incredible plugins and Dart is a pretty straight forward and easy-to-learn language, even more, if you came from JavaScript. I admit it. I'm in love with Flutter. When you are not a designer, having a framework focused on design an pretty things is a must. And counting with tools like #flare for animations makes everything easier. It is so amazing that I wish I had a big mobile project right now at work just to use Flutter.

    See more
    Babel logo

    Babel

    16.2K
    9.1K
    389
    Use next generation JavaScript, today.
    16.2K
    9.1K
    + 1
    389
    PROS OF BABEL
    • 163
      Modern Javascript works with all browsers
    • 77
      Open source
    • 60
      Integration with lots of tools
    • 56
      Easy setup
    • 26
      Very active on github
    • 2
      Love
    • 2
      JSX
    • 2
      Source maps
    • 1
      Extensions
    CONS OF BABEL
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Babel posts

      Jonathan Pugh
      Software Engineer / Project Manager / Technical Architect · | 25 upvotes · 1.7M views

      I needed to choose a full stack of tools for cross platform mobile application design & development. After much research and trying different tools, these are what I came up with that work for me today:

      For the client coding I chose Framework7 because of its performance, easy learning curve, and very well designed, beautiful UI widgets. I think it's perfect for solo development or small teams. I didn't like React Native. It felt heavy to me and rigid. Framework7 allows the use of #CSS3, which I think is the best technology to come out of the #WWW movement. No other tech has been able to allow designers and developers to develop such flexible, high performance, customisable user interface elements that are highly responsive and hardware accelerated before. Now #CSS3 includes variables and flexboxes it is truly a powerful language and there is no longer a need for preprocessors such as #SCSS / #Sass / #less. React Native contains a very limited interpretation of #CSS3 which I found very frustrating after using #CSS3 for some years already and knowing its powerful features. The other very nice feature of Framework7 is that you can even build for the browser if you want your app to be available for desktop web browsers. The latest release also includes the ability to build for #Electron so you can have MacOS, Windows and Linux desktop apps. This is not possible with React Native yet.

      Framework7 runs on top of Apache Cordova. Cordova and webviews have been slated as being slow in the past. Having a game developer background I found the tweeks to make it run as smooth as silk. One of those tweeks is to use WKWebView. Another important one was using srcset on images.

      I use #Template7 for the for the templating system which is a no-nonsense mobile-centric #HandleBars style extensible templating system. It's easy to write custom helpers for, is fast and has a small footprint. I'm not forced into a new paradigm or learning some new syntax. It operates with standard JavaScript, HTML5 and CSS 3. It's written by the developer of Framework7 and so dovetails with it as expected.

      I configured TypeScript to work with the latest version of Framework7. I consider TypeScript to be one of the best creations to come out of Microsoft in some time. They must have an amazing team working on it. It's very powerful and flexible. It helps you catch a lot of bugs and also provides code completion in supporting IDEs. So for my IDE I use Visual Studio Code which is a blazingly fast and silky smooth editor that integrates seamlessly with TypeScript for the ultimate type checking setup (both products are produced by Microsoft).

      I use Webpack and Babel to compile the JavaScript. TypeScript can compile to JavaScript directly but Babel offers a few more options and polyfills so you can use the latest (and even prerelease) JavaScript features today and compile to be backwards compatible with virtually any browser. My favorite recent addition is "optional chaining" which greatly simplifies and increases readability of a number of sections of my code dealing with getting and setting data in nested objects.

      I use some Ruby scripts to process images with ImageMagick and pngquant to optimise for size and even auto insert responsive image code into the HTML5. Ruby is the ultimate cross platform scripting language. Even as your scripts become large, Ruby allows you to refactor your code easily and make it Object Oriented if necessary. I find it the quickest and easiest way to maintain certain aspects of my build process.

      For the user interface design and prototyping I use Figma. Figma has an almost identical user interface to #Sketch but has the added advantage of being cross platform (MacOS and Windows). Its real-time collaboration features are outstanding and I use them a often as I work mostly on remote projects. Clients can collaborate in real-time and see changes I make as I make them. The clickable prototyping features in Figma are also very well designed and mean I can send clickable prototypes to clients to try user interface updates as they are made and get immediate feedback. I'm currently also evaluating the latest version of #AdobeXD as an alternative to Figma as it has the very cool auto-animate feature. It doesn't have real-time collaboration yet, but I heard it is proposed for 2019.

      For the UI icons I use Font Awesome Pro. They have the largest selection and best looking icons you can find on the internet with several variations in styles so you can find most of the icons you want for standard projects.

      For the backend I was using the #GraphCool Framework. As I later found out, #GraphQL still has some way to go in order to provide the full power of a mature graph query language so later in my project I ripped out #GraphCool and replaced it with CouchDB and Pouchdb. Primarily so I could provide good offline app support. CouchDB with Pouchdb is very flexible and efficient combination and overcomes some of the restrictions I found in #GraphQL and hence #GraphCool also. The most impressive and important feature of CouchDB is its replication. You can configure it in various ways for backups, fault tolerance, caching or conditional merging of databases. CouchDB and Pouchdb even supports storing, retrieving and serving binary or image data or other mime types. This removes a level of complexity usually present in database implementations where binary or image data is usually referenced through an #HTML5 link. With CouchDB and Pouchdb apps can operate offline and sync later, very efficiently, when the network connection is good.

      I use PhoneGap when testing the app. It auto-reloads your app when its code is changed and you can also install it on Android phones to preview your app instantly. iOS is a bit more tricky cause of Apple's policies so it's not available on the App Store, but you can build it and install it yourself to your device.

      So that's my latest mobile stack. What tools do you use? Have you tried these ones?

      See more
      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 22 upvotes · 1.1M views

      Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

      • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
      • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
      • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
      • TypeScript as programming language
      • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
      • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
      • Jest as testing framework
      • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
      • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

      The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

      • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
      • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
      • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
      • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
      • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
      • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
      See more
      Elm logo

      Elm

      619
      684
      301
      A type inferred, functional reactive language that compiles to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript
      619
      684
      + 1
      301
      PROS OF ELM
      • 43
        Code stays clean
      • 41
        Great type system
      • 39
        No Runtime Exceptions
      • 32
        Fun
      • 27
        Easy to understand
      • 21
        Correctness
      • 21
        Type safety
      • 15
        JS fatigue
      • 11
        Declarative
      • 11
        Ecosystem agrees on one Application Architecture
      • 9
        Friendly compiler messages
      • 7
        Fast rendering
      • 7
        Welcoming community
      • 6
        If it compiles, it runs
      • 5
        Stable ecosystem
      • 4
        'Batteries included'
      • 2
        Package.elm-lang.org
      CONS OF ELM
      • 2
        No typeclasses -> repitition (i.e. map has 130versions)
      • 2
        JS interoperability a bit more involved
      • 1
        Backwards compability breaks between releases
      • 1
        More code is required
      • 1
        Main developer enforces "the correct" style hard
      • 1
        JS interop can not be async
      • 1
        No communication with users

      related Elm posts

      Shared insights
      on
      ReactReactReduxReduxElmElm

      React is awesome, but is just a view library, when we need to manage state, there is Redux.js. The ecosystem of redux is big, complex and hard to integrate. That's why we choose to create hydux. Hydux is simple, the main idea is from Elm, a pure functional vdom-based framework for front-end. We seperate the whole app with state, actions and views. Which means not only our views are a tree, but also our state and actions. Reuse state and actions are just like reuse react components, no need to consider dependences.

      See more
      ES6 logo

      ES6

      55.9K
      45.5K
      161
      The next version of JavaScript
      55.9K
      45.5K
      + 1
      161
      PROS OF ES6
      • 107
        ES6 code is shorter than traditional JS
      • 50
        Module System Standardized
      • 2
        Destructuring Assignment
      • 2
        Extremly compact
      CONS OF ES6
      • 1
        Suffers from baggage

      related ES6 posts

      Nick Parsons
      Director of Developer Marketing at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 1.6M views

      Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

      We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

      We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

      Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

      #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

      See more
      Ali Soueidan
      Creative Web Developer at Ali Soueidan · | 18 upvotes · 871.7K views

      Application and Data: Since my personal website ( https://alisoueidan.com ) is a SPA I've chosen to use Vue.js, as a framework to create it. After a short skeptical phase I immediately felt in love with the single file component concept! I also used vuex for state management, which makes working with several components, which are communicating with each other even more fun and convenient to use. Of course, using Vue requires using JavaScript as well, since it is the basis of it.

      For markup and style, I used Pug and Sass, since they’re the perfect match to me. I love the clean and strict syntax of both of them and even more that their structure is almost similar. Also, both of them come with an expanded functionality such as mixins, loops and so on related to their “siblings” (HTML and CSS). Both of them require nesting and prevent untidy code, which can be a huge advantage when working in teams. I used JSON to store data (since the data quantity on my website is moderate) – JSON works also good in combo with Pug, using for loops, based on the JSON Objects for example.

      To send my contact form I used PHP, since sending emails using PHP is still relatively convenient, simple and easy done.

      DevOps: Of course, I used Git to do my version management (which I even do in smaller projects like my website just have an additional backup of my code). On top of that I used GitHub since it now supports private repository for free accounts (which I am using for my own). I use Babel to use ES6 functionality such as arrow functions and so on, and still don’t losing cross browser compatibility.

      Side note: I used npm for package management. 🎉

      *Business Tools: * I use Asana to organize my project. This is a big advantage to me, even if I work alone, since “private” projects can get interrupted for some time. By using Asana I still know (even after month of not touching a project) what I’ve done, on which task I was at last working on and what still is to do. Working in Teams (for enterprise I’d take on Jira instead) of course Asana is a Tool which I really love to use as well. All the graphics on my website are SVG which I have created with Adobe Illustrator and adjusted within the SVG code or by using JavaScript or CSS (SASS).

      See more
      CoffeeScript logo

      CoffeeScript

      2.6K
      1.2K
      1K
      A little language that compiles into JavaScript
      2.6K
      1.2K
      + 1
      1K
      PROS OF COFFEESCRIPT
      • 198
        Easy to read
      • 179
        Faster to write
      • 126
        Syntactic sugar
      • 104
        Readable
      • 104
        Elegant
      • 73
        Pretty
      • 53
        Javascript the good parts
      • 48
        Open source
      • 44
        Classes
      • 35
        "it's just javascript"
      • 16
        Compact code
      • 15
        Easy
      • 13
        Simple
      • 13
        Not Javascript
      • 2
        Does the same with less code
      • 1
        I'm jobs I'm software engineer
      CONS OF COFFEESCRIPT
      • 2
        No ES6
      • 1
        Corner cases in syntax
      • 1
        Parentheses required in 0-ary function calls
      • 1
        Unclear what will be grouped to {…}

      related CoffeeScript posts

      Stitch’s frontend is used to configure data sources and destinations and monitor the status of each. Although we have been using AngularJS since its early days, we recently introduced React components into our front end, which many of our developers find easier to work with. We started using CoffeeScript when it was one of the few options for a more expressive alternative to vanilla JavaScript, but today we opt to instead write new code in ES6, which we feel is a more mature alternative.

      See more
      Eli Hooten

      We chose TypeScript at Codecov when undergoing a recent rewrite of a legacy front end. Our previous front end was a mishmash of vanilla JavaScript and CoffeeScript , and was expanded upon haphazardly as the need arose. Without a unifying set of paradigms and patterns, the CoffeeScript and JavaScript setup was proving hard to maintain and expand upon by an engineering team. During a move to Vue.js , we decided to also make the move to TypeScript. Integrating TypeScript and Vue.js is fairly well understood at this point, so the setup wasn't all that difficult, and we felt that the benefits of incorporating TypeScript would outweigh the required time to set it up and get our engineering team up to speed.

      Choosing to add TypeScript has given us one more layer to rely on to help enforce code quality, good standards, and best practices within our engineering organization. One of the biggest benefits for us as an engineering team has been how well our IDEs and editors (e.g., Visual Studio Code ) integrate with and understand TypeScript . This allows developers to catch many more errors at development time instead of relying on run time. The end result is safer (from a type perspective) code and a more efficient coding experience that helps to catch and remove errors with less developer effort.

      See more
      Java logo

      Java

      101.1K
      77.1K
      3.7K
      A concurrent, class-based, object-oriented, language specifically designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible
      101.1K
      77.1K
      + 1
      3.7K
      PROS OF JAVA
      • 587
        Great libraries
      • 441
        Widely used
      • 400
        Excellent tooling
      • 387
        Huge amount of documentation available
      • 331
        Large pool of developers available
      • 203
        Open source
      • 200
        Excellent performance
      • 155
        Great development
      • 149
        Vast array of 3rd party libraries
      • 147
        Used for android
      • 60
        Compiled Language
      • 49
        Used for Web
      • 46
        Managed memory
      • 45
        High Performance
      • 44
        Native threads
      • 42
        Statically typed
      • 35
        Easy to read
      • 33
        Great Community
      • 29
        Reliable platform
      • 24
        JVM compatibility
      • 24
        Sturdy garbage collection
      • 21
        Cross Platform Enterprise Integration
      • 20
        Good amount of APIs
      • 20
        Universal platform
      • 18
        Great Support
      • 13
        Great ecosystem
      • 11
        Lots of boilerplate
      • 11
        Backward compatible
      • 10
        Everywhere
      • 9
        Excellent SDK - JDK
      • 7
        Static typing
      • 6
        Mature language thus stable systems
      • 6
        Better than Ruby
      • 6
        Long term language
      • 6
        Cross-platform
      • 6
        Portability
      • 6
        It's Java
      • 5
        Vast Collections Library
      • 5
        Clojure
      • 5
        Used for Android development
      • 4
        Most developers favorite
      • 4
        Old tech
      • 3
        Javadoc
      • 3
        Stable platform, which many new languages depend on
      • 3
        Best martial for design
      • 3
        Great Structure
      • 3
        History
      • 3
        Testable
      • 2
        Faster than python
      • 1
        Type Safe
      CONS OF JAVA
      • 32
        Verbosity
      • 27
        NullpointerException
      • 16
        Overcomplexity is praised in community culture
      • 14
        Nightmare to Write
      • 11
        Boiler plate code
      • 8
        Classpath hell prior to Java 9
      • 6
        No REPL
      • 4
        No property
      • 2
        Non-intuitive generic implementation
      • 2
        There is not optional parameter
      • 2
        Code are too long
      • 2
        Floating-point errors
      • 1
        Returning Wildcard Types
      • 1
        Java's too statically, stronglly, and strictly typed
      • 1
        Terrbible compared to Python/Batch Perormence

      related Java posts

      Conor Myhrvold
      Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 40 upvotes · 4.8M views

      How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

      Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

      Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

      https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

      (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

      Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

      See more
      Kamil Kowalski
      Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 1.4M views

      When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

      See more