Alternatives to TinyPNG logo

Alternatives to TinyPNG

Imagify, Kraken.io, OpenCV, Cloudinary, and Pillow are the most popular alternatives and competitors to TinyPNG.
13
24
+ 1
0

What is TinyPNG and what are its top alternatives?

TinyPNG is a popular online tool for compressing images without losing quality. It reduces the file size of PNG and JPEG images by using smart compression techniques. Key features of TinyPNG include batch processing, support for transparent backgrounds, and compatibility with popular image editing software. However, the free version has limitations on file size and number of compressions per day.

  1. ImageOptim: ImageOptim is a free app for Mac that helps reduce the file size of images without losing quality. It supports various image formats and offers batch processing. Pros: Free to use, easy to use interface. Cons: Limited to Mac users.
  2. Kraken.io: Kraken.io is an online image optimization tool that offers API integration and fast compression speeds. It supports various file formats and allows for custom optimization settings. Pros: API integration, fast compression. Cons: Premium pricing for advanced features.
  3. Compressor.io: Compressor.io is an online tool that specializes in reducing the file size of images while preserving quality. It supports various file formats and provides real-time previews of compressed images. Pros: Real-time previews, user-friendly interface. Cons: Limited to online use.
  4. Optimizilla: Optimizilla is a free online image compressor that allows for simultaneous compression of multiple images. It offers a slider to adjust the compression level and provides a side-by-side comparison of the original and compressed images. Pros: Simultaneous compression, adjustable compression level. Cons: Limited file size for free version.
  5. JPEGmini: JPEGmini is a tool specifically designed for reducing the file size of JPEG images. It uses a proprietary algorithm to optimize images without visible quality loss. Pros: Specialized for JPEG compression, high-quality results. Cons: Premium pricing for full features.
  6. TinyJPG: TinyJPG is a sister site to TinyPNG and focuses on compressing JPEG images. It offers a simple drag-and-drop interface for optimizing images. Pros: Easy to use, supports JPEG compression. Cons: Limited to JPEG images.
  7. Squoosh: Squoosh is a web app developed by Google that allows users to compress and compare image quality in real-time. It offers various compression options and supports multiple file formats. Pros: Developed by Google, real-time comparison. Cons: Online use only.
  8. Resizing.app: Resizing.app is an online tool that not only compresses images but also allows for resizing and converting between different formats. It supports batch processing and offers customization options. Pros: Multiple functionalities, batch processing. Cons: Limited to online use.
  9. EWWW Image Optimizer: EWWW Image Optimizer is a WordPress plugin that automatically optimizes images uploaded to a website. It offers both lossy and lossless optimization options and supports a wide range of file formats. Pros: WordPress integration, lossy and lossless options. Cons: Requires WordPress platform.
  10. TinyPNG Photoshop Plugin: TinyPNG offers a Photoshop plugin that integrates with the software for easy image optimization. It allows for batch processing within Photoshop and provides seamless compression of images. Pros: Integration with Photoshop, batch processing. Cons: Limited to Photoshop users.

Top Alternatives to TinyPNG

  • Imagify
    Imagify

    Speed up your website by reducing the size of your images without losing quality. ...

  • Kraken.io
    Kraken.io

    It supports JPEG, PNG and GIF files. You can optimize your images in two ways - by providing an URL of the image you want to optimize or by uploading an image file directly to its API. ...

  • OpenCV
    OpenCV

    OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform. ...

  • Cloudinary
    Cloudinary

    Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery. ...

  • Pillow
    Pillow

    It adds image processing capabilities to your Python interpreter. It provides extensive file format support, an efficient internal representation, and fairly powerful image processing capabilities. ...

  • FFMPEG
    FFMPEG

    The universal multimedia toolkit.

  • scikit-image
    scikit-image

    scikit-image is a collection of algorithms for image processing.

  • imgix
    imgix

    imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters. ...

TinyPNG alternatives & related posts

Imagify logo

Imagify

16
32
0
A new way to optimize your images and have a faster website!
16
32
+ 1
0
PROS OF IMAGIFY
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF IMAGIFY
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Imagify posts

      Kraken.io logo

      Kraken.io

      16
      53
      7
      Image optimization and compression API
      16
      53
      + 1
      7
      PROS OF KRAKEN.IO
      • 6
        Free
      • 1
        Magento plugin
      CONS OF KRAKEN.IO
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Kraken.io posts

        OpenCV logo

        OpenCV

        1.2K
        1K
        97
        Open Source Computer Vision Library
        1.2K
        1K
        + 1
        97
        PROS OF OPENCV
        • 36
          Computer Vision
        • 17
          Open Source
        • 12
          Imaging
        • 9
          Face Detection
        • 9
          Machine Learning
        • 6
          Great community
        • 4
          Realtime Image Processing
        • 2
          Helping almost CV problem
        • 2
          Image Augmentation
        CONS OF OPENCV
          Be the first to leave a con

          related OpenCV posts

          Shared insights
          on
          FFMPEGFFMPEGOpenCVOpenCV

          Hi Team,

          Could you please suggest which one need to be used in between OpenCV and FFMPEG.

          Thank you in Advance.

          See more
          Cloudinary logo

          Cloudinary

          576
          590
          179
          An end-to-end image & video management solution for your web and mobile applications
          576
          590
          + 1
          179
          PROS OF CLOUDINARY
          • 37
            Easy setup
          • 31
            Fast image delivery
          • 26
            Vast array of image manipulation capabilities
          • 21
            Free tier
          • 11
            Heroku add-on
          • 9
            Reduce development costs
          • 7
            Amazing support
          • 6
            Heroku plugin
          • 6
            Great libraries for all languages
          • 6
            Virtually limitless scale
          • 5
            Easy to integrate with Rails
          • 4
            Cheap
          • 3
            Shot setup time
          • 3
            Very easy setup
          • 2
            Solves alot of image problems.
          • 1
            Best in the market and includes free plan
          • 1
            Extremely generous free pricing tier
          • 0
            Fast image delivery, vast array
          CONS OF CLOUDINARY
          • 5
            Paid plan is expensive

          related Cloudinary posts

          Pillow logo

          Pillow

          464
          4
          0
          Python Imaging Library
          464
          4
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF PILLOW
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF PILLOW
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Pillow posts

              FFMPEG logo

              FFMPEG

              366
              249
              5
              The universal multimedia toolkit.
              366
              249
              + 1
              5
              PROS OF FFMPEG
              • 5
                Open Source
              CONS OF FFMPEG
                Be the first to leave a con

                related FFMPEG posts

                Shared insights
                on
                FFMPEGFFMPEGOpenCVOpenCV

                Hi Team,

                Could you please suggest which one need to be used in between OpenCV and FFMPEG.

                Thank you in Advance.

                See more
                Shared insights
                on
                GStreamerGStreamerFFMPEGFFMPEG

                I have a situation to convert the H264 streams into MP4 format using FFMPEG/GStreamer.

                However Im stuck with the gst-ugly plugin, now trying my luck with ffmeg. How big are the ffmeg libs and licensing complications?

                See more
                scikit-image logo

                scikit-image

                250
                127
                11
                Image processing in Python
                250
                127
                + 1
                11
                PROS OF SCIKIT-IMAGE
                • 6
                  More powerful
                • 4
                  Anaconda compatibility
                • 1
                  Great documentation
                CONS OF SCIKIT-IMAGE
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related scikit-image posts

                  imgix logo

                  imgix

                  215
                  318
                  176
                  Optimize, manage, and deliver images and videos for faster pages, better visual quality, and a simpler workflow.
                  215
                  318
                  + 1
                  176
                  PROS OF IMGIX
                  • 28
                    Image processing on demand
                  • 24
                    Easy setup
                  • 18
                    Smart Cropping
                  • 18
                    Reduce Development Costs
                  • 15
                    Efficient
                  • 12
                    Insanely Fast
                  • 11
                    Filters, resizing, blur and more as url parameters
                  • 10
                    Easy to understand pricing
                  • 9
                    Professional Features and Options
                  • 6
                    Lightyears better than ImageMagick
                  • 6
                    Excellent Face Detection
                  • 5
                    S3 as source
                  • 4
                    Scales to your company's needs
                  • 4
                    Great for Dynamic Compositing
                  • 1
                    Video encoding
                  • 1
                    Fast Image Delivery
                  • 1
                    Free tier
                  • 1
                    Amazing support
                  • 1
                    Great libraries and integrations
                  • 1
                    Automatic scrset generation
                  CONS OF IMGIX
                    Be the first to leave a con

                    related imgix posts

                    Mountain/ \Ash

                    Platform Update: we’ve been using the Performance Test tool provided by KeyCDN for a long time in combination with Pingdom's similar tool and the #WebpageTest and #GoogleInsight - we decided to test out KeyCDN for static asset hosting. The results for the endpoints were superfast - almost 200% faster than CloudFlare in some tests and 370% faster than imgix . So we’ve moved Washington Brown from imgix for hosting theme images, to KeyCDN for hosting all images and static assets (Font, CSS & JS). There’s a few things that we like about “Key” apart from saving $6 a month on the monthly minimum spend ($4 vs $10 for imgix). Key allow for a custom CNAME (no more advertising imgix.com in domain requests and possible SEO improvements - and easier to swap to another host down the track). Key allows JPEG/WebP image requests based on clients ‘accept’ http headers - imgix required a ?auto=format query string on each image resource request - which can break some caches. Key allows for explicitly denying cookies to be set on a zone/domain; cookies are a big strain on limited upload bandwidth so to be able to force these off is great - Cloudflare adds a cookie to every header… for “performance reasons”… but remember “if you’re getting a product something for free…”

                    See more
                    Mountain/ \Ash

                    In mid-2018 we made a big push for speed on the site. The site, running on PHP, was taking about 7 seconds to load. The site had already been running through CloudFlare for some time but on a shared host in Sydney (which is also where most of the customers are). We found when developing the @TuffTruck site that DigitalOcean was fast - and even though it's located overseas, we still found it 2 seconds faster for Australian users. We found that some Wordpress plugins were really slowing the TTFB - with all plugins off, Wordpress would save respond 1.5-2 seconds faster. With a on/off step through of each plugin we found 2 plugins by Ontraport (a CRM type service that some forms we populating) was the main culprit. Out it went and we built our own WP plugin to do push the data to Ontraport only when required. With the TTFB acceptable, we moved on to getting the completed page load time down. Turning on CloudFlare 's HTML/CSS/JS minifications & Rocket Loader we could get our group of test pages, including the homepage, loading [in full] in just over 2 seconds. We then moved images off to imgix and put the CSS, JS and Fonts onto a mirrored subdomain (so that cookies weren't exchanged), but this only shaved about another 0.2 seconds off. We are keeping it running for the moment, but the $10 minimum a month for imgix is hardly worth it (this would be change if new images were going up all the time and needed processing). The client is overly happy with the ~70% improvement and has already seen the site move up the ranks of Google's SERP and bring down their PPC costs. AND all the new hosting providers still come in at half the price of the previous Sydney hosting service. We have a few ideas that we are testing on our staging site and will roll these out soon.

                    See more