Alternatives to Thumbor logo

Alternatives to Thumbor

imgix, ImageMagick, Cloudinary, Google Drive, and CloudFlare are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Thumbor.
23
28
+ 1
0

What is Thumbor and what are its top alternatives?

Thumbor is an open-source image processing service that allows users to resize, crop, and manipulate images on the fly. It provides features like smart cropping, face detection, watermarking, and security through signed URLs. However, one of its limitations is the need for a server to host the Thumbor service, which can add complexity to the infrastructure setup.

  1. imgix: imgix is a real-time image processing service that enables users to resize, crop, and optimize images for the web. Key features include CDN integration, advanced image editing capabilities, and responsive image delivery. Pros: Easy integration with CDN, advanced image optimization tools. Cons: Cost may be higher compared to self-hosted solutions like Thumbor.
  2. Cloudinary: Cloudinary is a cloud-based image management platform that offers features like image transformation, optimization, and delivery. It provides a comprehensive set of APIs for developers to easily manipulate images. Pros: Scalable cloud infrastructure, extensive API support. Cons: Limited control over image processing compared to self-hosted solutions.
  3. Fastly Image Optimizer: Fastly Image Optimizer is a real-time image processing solution that integrates with Fastly's CDN to deliver optimized images at the edge. It offers features like format conversion, resizing, and quality adjustments. Pros: Seamless integration with Fastly CDN, edge computing for faster image delivery. Cons: Limited to Fastly's CDN customers.
  4. Cloudimage.io: Cloudimage.io is a cloud-based image processing tool that provides automatic image optimization, resizing, and acceleration through CDN integration. It offers features like lazy loading, progressive rendering, and WebP support. Pros: Easy setup, automatic optimization, CDN integration. Cons: Pricing can be based on the number of processed images.
  5. Kraken.io: Kraken.io is a cloud-based image optimization service that helps users reduce image file sizes while maintaining visual quality. It offers features like lossless and lossy compression, resizing, and format conversion. Pros: High compression ratios, easy-to-use API. Cons: Limited image processing capabilities compared to other tools like Thumbor.
  6. Sirv: Sirv is a cloud-based image optimization and delivery platform that offers features like on-the-fly processing, responsive images, and lazy loading. It provides integration with popular CMS platforms like WordPress and Magento. Pros: Easy integration with CMS platforms, on-the-fly image processing. Cons: Limited customization options for advanced image manipulation.
  7. ImageKit.io: ImageKit.io is an image optimization and delivery service that offers features like URL-based transformation, automatic format detection, and lazy loading. It integrates with popular storage solutions like AWS S3 and supports WebP and AVIF formats. Pros: URL-based transformations, easy integration with storage solutions. Cons: Pricing based on bandwidth and transformations.
  8. Imgproxy: Imgproxy is an open-source image resizing and optimization service that focuses on security and performance. It provides features like client-side resizing, format conversion, and support for secure image URLs. Pros: Self-hosted solution, high performance, security features. Cons: Requires more technical expertise to set up and maintain compared to cloud-based solutions.
  9. PicMonkey: PicMonkey is an online image editing and design tool that offers features like photo retouching, graphic design, and collage making. It provides templates and effects for quick image enhancement. Pros: User-friendly interface, creative design tools. Cons: Limited image processing capabilities compared to dedicated image optimization services.
  10. KrakenD.io: KrakenD is an open-source API Gateway focused on performance and high concurrency. It offers features like rate limiting, circuit breaking, and caching to optimize API performance. Pros: High performance, extensive caching capabilities. Cons: More suited for API optimization rather than image processing specifically.

Top Alternatives to Thumbor

  • imgix
    imgix

    imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters. ...

  • ImageMagick
    ImageMagick

    It is a free and open-source software suite for displaying, converting, and editing raster image and vector image files. It can read and write images in a variety of formats (over 200) including PNG, JPEG, GIF, HEIC, TIFF, DPX, EXR, WebP, Postscript, PDF, and SVG. ...

  • Cloudinary
    Cloudinary

    Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery. ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

Thumbor alternatives & related posts

imgix logo

imgix

217
177
Optimize, manage, and deliver images and videos for faster pages, better visual quality, and a simpler workflow.
217
177
PROS OF IMGIX
  • 28
    Image processing on demand
  • 24
    Easy setup
  • 18
    Smart Cropping
  • 18
    Reduce Development Costs
  • 15
    Efficient
  • 12
    Insanely Fast
  • 11
    Filters, resizing, blur and more as url parameters
  • 10
    Easy to understand pricing
  • 9
    Professional Features and Options
  • 6
    Excellent Face Detection
  • 6
    Lightyears better than ImageMagick
  • 5
    S3 as source
  • 4
    Great for Dynamic Compositing
  • 4
    Scales to your company's needs
  • 1
    Free tier
  • 1
    Amazing support
  • 1
    Great libraries and integrations
  • 1
    Automatic scrset generation
  • 1
    Forward thinking
  • 1
    Video encoding
  • 1
    Fast Image Delivery
CONS OF IMGIX
    Be the first to leave a con

    related imgix posts

    Mountain/ \Ash

    Platform Update: we’ve been using the Performance Test tool provided by KeyCDN for a long time in combination with Pingdom's similar tool and the #WebpageTest and #GoogleInsight - we decided to test out KeyCDN for static asset hosting. The results for the endpoints were superfast - almost 200% faster than CloudFlare in some tests and 370% faster than imgix . So we’ve moved Washington Brown from imgix for hosting theme images, to KeyCDN for hosting all images and static assets (Font, CSS & JS). There’s a few things that we like about “Key” apart from saving $6 a month on the monthly minimum spend ($4 vs $10 for imgix). Key allow for a custom CNAME (no more advertising imgix.com in domain requests and possible SEO improvements - and easier to swap to another host down the track). Key allows JPEG/WebP image requests based on clients ‘accept’ http headers - imgix required a ?auto=format query string on each image resource request - which can break some caches. Key allows for explicitly denying cookies to be set on a zone/domain; cookies are a big strain on limited upload bandwidth so to be able to force these off is great - Cloudflare adds a cookie to every header… for “performance reasons”… but remember “if you’re getting a product something for free…”

    See more
    Mountain/ \Ash

    In mid-2018 we made a big push for speed on the site. The site, running on PHP, was taking about 7 seconds to load. The site had already been running through CloudFlare for some time but on a shared host in Sydney (which is also where most of the customers are). We found when developing the @TuffTruck site that DigitalOcean was fast - and even though it's located overseas, we still found it 2 seconds faster for Australian users. We found that some Wordpress plugins were really slowing the TTFB - with all plugins off, Wordpress would save respond 1.5-2 seconds faster. With a on/off step through of each plugin we found 2 plugins by Ontraport (a CRM type service that some forms we populating) was the main culprit. Out it went and we built our own WP plugin to do push the data to Ontraport only when required. With the TTFB acceptable, we moved on to getting the completed page load time down. Turning on CloudFlare 's HTML/CSS/JS minifications & Rocket Loader we could get our group of test pages, including the homepage, loading [in full] in just over 2 seconds. We then moved images off to imgix and put the CSS, JS and Fonts onto a mirrored subdomain (so that cookies weren't exchanged), but this only shaved about another 0.2 seconds off. We are keeping it running for the moment, but the $10 minimum a month for imgix is hardly worth it (this would be change if new images were going up all the time and needed processing). The client is overly happy with the ~70% improvement and has already seen the site move up the ranks of Google's SERP and bring down their PPC costs. AND all the new hosting providers still come in at half the price of the previous Sydney hosting service. We have a few ideas that we are testing on our staging site and will roll these out soon.

    See more
    ImageMagick logo

    ImageMagick

    84
    0
    A software suite to create, edit, compose, or convert bitmap images
    84
    0
    PROS OF IMAGEMAGICK
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF IMAGEMAGICK
        Be the first to leave a con

        related ImageMagick posts

        Cloudinary logo

        Cloudinary

        604
        179
        An end-to-end image & video management solution for your web and mobile applications
        604
        179
        PROS OF CLOUDINARY
        • 37
          Easy setup
        • 31
          Fast image delivery
        • 26
          Vast array of image manipulation capabilities
        • 21
          Free tier
        • 11
          Heroku add-on
        • 9
          Reduce development costs
        • 7
          Amazing support
        • 6
          Heroku plugin
        • 6
          Great libraries for all languages
        • 6
          Virtually limitless scale
        • 5
          Easy to integrate with Rails
        • 4
          Cheap
        • 3
          Shot setup time
        • 3
          Very easy setup
        • 2
          Solves alot of image problems.
        • 1
          Best in the market and includes free plan
        • 1
          Extremely generous free pricing tier
        • 0
          Fast image delivery, vast array
        CONS OF CLOUDINARY
        • 5
          Paid plan is expensive

        related Cloudinary posts

        Google Drive logo

        Google Drive

        83.9K
        2.1K
        A safe place for all your files
        83.9K
        2.1K
        PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
        • 505
          Easy to use
        • 326
          Gmail integration
        • 312
          Enough free space
        • 268
          Collaboration
        • 249
          Stable service
        • 128
          Desktop and mobile apps
        • 97
          Offline sync
        • 79
          Apps
        • 74
          15 gb storage
        • 50
          Add-ons
        • 9
          Integrates well
        • 6
          Easy to use
        • 3
          Simple back-up tool
        • 2
          Linux terminal transfer tools
        • 2
          It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
        • 2
          Amazing
        • 2
          Beautiful
        • 2
          Fast upload speeds
        • 2
          The more the merrier
        • 2
          So easy
        • 2
          Wonderful
        • 1
          G Suite integration
        • 1
          UI
        • 1
          Windows desktop
        • 1
          Space Analytics
        CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
        • 7
          Organization via web ui sucks
        • 2
          Not a real database

        related Google Drive posts

        Tom Klein

        Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

        I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

        Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

        See more
        CloudFlare logo

        CloudFlare

        77.3K
        1.8K
        The Web Performance & Security Company.
        77.3K
        1.8K
        PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
        • 426
          Easy setup, great cdn
        • 278
          Free ssl
        • 200
          Easy setup
        • 191
          Security
        • 181
          Ssl
        • 98
          Great cdn
        • 77
          Optimizer
        • 71
          Simple
        • 44
          Great UI
        • 28
          Great js cdn
        • 12
          AutoMinify
        • 12
          HTTP/2 Support
        • 12
          Apps
        • 12
          DNS Analytics
        • 9
          Ipv6
        • 9
          Rocket Loader
        • 9
          Easy
        • 8
          Fantastic CDN service
        • 8
          IPv6 "One Click"
        • 7
          DNSSEC
        • 7
          Free GeoIP
        • 7
          Amazing performance
        • 7
          API
        • 7
          Cheapest SSL
        • 7
          Nice DNS
        • 7
          SSHFP
        • 6
          SPDY
        • 6
          Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
        • 5
          Asynchronous resource loading
        • 5
          Ubuntu
        • 4
          Global Load Balancing
        • 4
          Easy Use
        • 4
          Performance
        • 3
          CDN
        • 2
          Support for SSHFP records
        • 2
          Registrar
        • 1
          Web3
        • 1
          Прохси
        • 1
          HTTPS3/Quic
        CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
        • 2
          No support for SSHFP records
        • 2
          Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

        related CloudFlare posts

        Tom Klein

        Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

        See more
        Johnny Bell

        When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

        One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

        Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

        When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

        I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

        See more
        Dropbox logo

        Dropbox

        23.5K
        1.7K
        Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
        23.5K
        1.7K
        PROS OF DROPBOX
        • 434
          Easy to work with
        • 256
          Free
        • 216
          Popular
        • 176
          Shared file hosting
        • 167
          'just works'
        • 100
          No brainer
        • 80
          Integration with external services
        • 77
          Simple
        • 49
          Good api
        • 38
          Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
        • 11
          It just works
        • 8
          Convenient
        • 7
          Accessible from all of my devices
        • 5
          Command Line client
        • 4
          Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
        • 4
          Can even be used by your grandma
        • 3
          Cross platform app
        • 3
          Sync API
        • 3
          Reliable
        • 3
          Mac app
        • 2
          Backups, local and cloud
        • 2
          Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
        • 2
          Delta synchronization
        • 2
          Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
        • 2
          Extended version history
        • 2
          Beautiful UI
        • 1
          YC Company
        • 1
          What a beautiful app
        • 1
          Easy/no setup
        • 1
          So easy
        • 1
          The more the merrier
        • 1
          Easy to work with
        • 1
          For when client needs file without opening firewall
        • 1
          Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
        • 1
          Easy to use
        • 1
          Official Linux app
        • 0
          The more the merrier
        CONS OF DROPBOX
        • 3
          Personal vs company account is confusing
        • 1
          Replication kills CPU and battery

        related Dropbox posts

        Shared insights
        on
        Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

        I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

        Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

        Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

        See more
        Amazon CloudFront logo

        Amazon CloudFront

        21.5K
        935
        Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
        21.5K
        935
        PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
        • 245
          Fast
        • 166
          Cdn
        • 157
          Compatible with other aws services
        • 125
          Simple
        • 108
          Global
        • 41
          Cheap
        • 36
          Cost-effective
        • 27
          Reliable
        • 19
          One stop solution
        • 9
          Elastic
        • 1
          Object store
        • 1
          HTTP/2 Support
        CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
        • 3
          UI could use some work
        • 1
          Invalidations take so long

        related Amazon CloudFront posts

        Russel Werner
        Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 3M views

        StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

        Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

        #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

        See more
        Julien DeFrance
        Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.2M views

        Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

        I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

        For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

        Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

        Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

        Future improvements / technology decisions included:

        Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

        As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

        One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

        See more
        Akamai logo

        Akamai

        1.9K
        0
        The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
        1.9K
        0
        PROS OF AKAMAI
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF AKAMAI
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Akamai posts