Alternatives to Tauri logo

Alternatives to Tauri

Electron, JavaFX, pygame, Qt5, and Element are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Tauri.
77
60
+ 1
0

What is Tauri and what are its top alternatives?

Tauri is a framework that allows developers to build secure and scalable Electron applications using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It provides a lightweight wrapper around the webview component embedded in a native application, reducing bundle sizes and improving performance. Tauri also offers various security features like code encryption, and support for multiple platform backends. However, Tauri's documentation can be challenging for beginners, and it requires some knowledge of Rust programming language for customization.

  1. Electron: Electron is a popular framework for building cross-platform desktop applications using web technologies. Key features include a wide range of plugins and a large community support. However, Electron applications can be resource-intensive compared to Tauri.
  2. Proton Native: Proton Native is a cross-platform React environment that compiles to native code and uses the React library for building desktop applications. It offers a simple API for creating desktop applications, but it may have limitations compared to Tauri in terms of performance and features.
  3. NW.js: NW.js allows developers to write desktop applications using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It offers support for a wide range of web technologies and provides easy access to the underlying operating system APIs. However, NW.js applications may have larger file sizes compared to Tauri.
  4. Nativefier: Nativefier is a command-line tool that creates a desktop application from a web application using minimal resources. It allows for customization and supports multiple platforms. However, Nativefier may lack some advanced features available in Tauri.
  5. Qt for Python: Qt for Python enables developers to create desktop applications using the Qt framework and Python programming language. It provides a powerful and flexible environment for building cross-platform applications, but it may have a steeper learning curve compared to Tauri.
  6. Avalonia: Avalonia is a cross-platform XAML framework for .NET developers to build desktop applications. It offers a rich set of controls and styles for creating modern user interfaces, but it may have limited support for web technologies compared to Tauri.
  7. Vue.js with Electron: Vue.js is a progressive JavaScript framework that can be used in conjunction with Electron for building desktop applications. It offers a simple and intuitive approach to building user interfaces, but it may not have the same level of performance optimization as Tauri.
  8. React with Electron: React is a JavaScript library that can be used with Electron for creating desktop applications. It provides a component-based architecture for building UI elements, but it may require additional configuration compared to Tauri.
  9. Flutter: Flutter is a UI toolkit for building natively compiled applications across mobile, web, and desktop from a single codebase. It offers a fast development process and hot reload feature, but it may have limitations in terms of native desktop capabilities compared to Tauri.
  10. Sciter: Sciter is a lightweight, embeddable HTML/CSS/script engine for desktop applications. It provides a fast and efficient way to create native applications using web technologies, but it may not have the same level of community support as Tauri.

Top Alternatives to Tauri

  • Electron
    Electron

    With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor. ...

  • JavaFX
    JavaFX

    It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms. ...

  • pygame
    pygame

    It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language. ...

  • Qt5
    Qt5

    It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms. ...

  • Element
    Element

    Element is a Vue 2.0 based component library for developers, designers and product managers, with a set of design resources. ...

  • SDL
    SDL

    It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D. ...

  • JUCE
    JUCE

    It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android. ...

  • Nativefier
    Nativefier

    Nativefier is a command line tool that allows you to easily create a desktop application for any web site with succinct and minimal configuration. Apps are wrapped by Electron in an OS executable (.app, .exe, etc.) for use on Windows, OSX and Linux. ...

Tauri alternatives & related posts

Electron logo

Electron

11.1K
9.8K
148
Build cross platform desktop apps with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS
11.1K
9.8K
+ 1
148
PROS OF ELECTRON
  • 69
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 53
    Open source
  • 14
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 8
    Because it's cross platform
  • 4
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
CONS OF ELECTRON
  • 18
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 1
    Each app needs to install a new chromium + nodejs
  • 1
    Wrong reference for dom inspection

related Electron posts

The Slack desktop app was originally written us the MacGap framework, which used Apple’s WebView to host web content inside of a native app frame. As this approach continued to present product limitations, Slack decided to migrate the desktop app to Electron. Electron is a platform that combines the rendering engine from Chromium and the Node.js runtime and module system. The desktop app is written as a modern ES6 + async/await React application.

For the desktop app, Slack takes a hybrid approach, wherein some of the assets ship as part of the app, but most of their assets and code are loaded remotely.

See more

Slack's new desktop application was launched for macOS. It was built using Electron for a faster, frameless look with a host of background improvements for a superior Slack experience. Instead of adopting a complete-in-box approach taken by other apps, Slack prefers a hybrid approach where some of the assets are loaded as part of the app, while others are made available remotely. Slack's original desktop app was written using the MacGap v1 framework using WebView to host web content within the native app frame. But it was difficult to upgrade with new features only available to Apple's WKWebView and moving to this view called for a total application rewrite.

Electron brings together Chromium's rendering engine with the Node.js runtime and module system. The new desktop app is now based on an ES6 + async/await React application is currently being moved gradually to TypeScript. Electron functions on Chromium's multi-process model, with each Slack team signed into a separate process and memory space. It also helps prevent remote content to directly access desktop features using a feature called WebView Element which creates a fresh Chromium renderer process and assigns rendering of content for its hosting renderer. Additional security can be ensured by preventing Node.js modules from leaking into the API surface and watching out for APIs with file paths. Communication between processes on Electron is carried out via electron-remote, a pared-down, zippy version of Electron's remote module, which makes implementing the web apps UI much easier.

See more
JavaFX logo

JavaFX

280
415
10
A Java library for building Rich Internet Applications
280
415
+ 1
10
PROS OF JAVAFX
  • 10
    Light
CONS OF JAVAFX
  • 1
    Community support less than qt
  • 1
    Complicated

related JavaFX posts

Shared insights
on
JavaFXJavaFXElectronElectron

I create desktop applications that use a database for storing data. My applications are used as management tools in supermarkets, stores, warehouses, and other places. I don't know which one to use; Electron or JavaFX. Can anyone advise me on this matter?

See more
pygame logo

pygame

109
169
5
Open Source python programming language library for making multimedia applications
109
169
+ 1
5
PROS OF PYGAME
  • 3
    Easy to install
  • 1
    Simple
  • 1
    Lightweigt by only being 12 mb
CONS OF PYGAME
  • 2
    Has only 2d
  • 1
    Slow

related pygame posts

Qt5 logo

Qt5

92
136
12
A free and open-source widget toolkit
92
136
+ 1
12
PROS OF QT5
  • 2
    Easy to learn and use
  • 2
    Cross platform
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    C++
  • 2
    Very good documentation
  • 2
    Fast enough
CONS OF QT5
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Qt5 posts

    Element logo

    Element

    81
    92
    3
    A Vue 2.0-based desktop UI library for developers, designers and PMs
    81
    92
    + 1
    3
    PROS OF ELEMENT
    • 3
      Very complete solution
    CONS OF ELEMENT
    • 2
      Buggy in parts

    related Element posts

    SDL logo

    SDL

    41
    45
    4
    A cross-platform software development library
    41
    45
    + 1
    4
    PROS OF SDL
    • 2
      Actively being worked on
    • 1
      Cross-platform
    • 1
      Fast
    CONS OF SDL
    • 1
      No GUI support

    related SDL posts

    JUCE logo

    JUCE

    35
    72
    10
    Deliver music applications on all main platforms, with high performances and professional tools
    35
    72
    + 1
    10
    PROS OF JUCE
    • 4
      Cross platform
    • 2
      Fast
    • 1
      Pure C++ code
    • 1
      Open Source
    • 1
      Performance
    • 1
      Nice GUI
    CONS OF JUCE
    • 2
      Free Edition has Made with Juce

    related JUCE posts

    Nativefier logo

    Nativefier

    29
    95
    2
    Wrap any web page natively without even thinking, across Windows, OSX and Linux
    29
    95
    + 1
    2
    PROS OF NATIVEFIER
    • 2
      Has a better Javascript support, and is much faster
    CONS OF NATIVEFIER
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Nativefier posts