StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Solarwinds vs Zabbix

Solarwinds vs Zabbix

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zabbix
Zabbix
Stacks684
Followers981
Votes66
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.1K
Solarwinds
Solarwinds
Stacks80
Followers119
Votes0

Solarwinds vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Solarwinds and Zabbix are both network monitoring tools that help businesses identify and troubleshoot network issues. While both platforms offer similar functionality, there are several key differences that set them apart.

1. Scalability:

One major difference between Solarwinds and Zabbix is their scalability. Solarwinds is known for its ability to scale horizontally, making it a suitable choice for large enterprises with complex networks. On the other hand, Zabbix is designed to scale vertically, which means it can handle a high volume of data from a single server. This makes Zabbix a more cost-effective option for smaller organizations or those with simpler network infrastructures.

2. Pricing Model:

Another key difference is the pricing model. Solarwinds follows a traditional licensing approach, where users pay for each monitored element or node. This can become expensive for organizations with a large number of devices in their network. In contrast, Zabbix offers a free and open-source version, making it more cost-effective for businesses on a tight budget. They also provide a paid enterprise version with additional features and support.

3. Ease of Use:

When it comes to ease of use, Solarwinds offers a more intuitive and user-friendly interface. Its visually appealing dashboards and customizable widgets make it easier for administrators to navigate and analyze network data. Zabbix, however, has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical expertise to configure and customize. While it may take more time initially, the flexibility and control it provides can be an advantage for experienced users.

4. Community Support:

Both Solarwinds and Zabbix have active communities that provide support and resources. However, Solarwinds has an advantage in terms of community support due to its popularity and user base. With a larger community, users can find more readily available documentation, tutorials, and plugins that can enhance their monitoring experience. Zabbix, although it has a smaller community, still provides ample resources and support, but users may need to rely more on the official documentation.

5. Cross-platform Compatibility:

Solarwinds is primarily designed for Windows-based environments, which can limit its compatibility with other operating systems. Zabbix, on the other hand, offers cross-platform compatibility, allowing users to monitor networks running on various operating systems, including Linux, Unix, and Windows. This flexibility makes Zabbix a more versatile choice for businesses that have mixed or diverse network infrastructures.

6. Customizability:

One notable difference between Solarwinds and Zabbix is the level of customizability they provide. Solarwinds has a vast array of built-in features and predefined templates, making it easier for administrators to get started quickly. However, customization options may be limited compared to Zabbix. Zabbix offers extensive flexibility and customization capabilities, allowing users to tailor the monitoring system to their specific needs. This can be advantageous for businesses that require highly tailored monitoring solutions.

In summary, Solarwinds offers scalability and user-friendly interfaces but at a higher cost, while Zabbix is more cost-effective, provides cross-platform compatibility, and allows extensive customization. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific needs and priorities of the organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Zabbix, Solarwinds

vivek
vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceonCentreonCentreonZabbixZabbixDatadogDatadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

796k views796k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix
Zabbix
Solarwinds
Solarwinds

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Developed by network and systems engineers who know what it takes to manage today's dynamic IT environments, SolarWinds has a deep connection to the IT community.

Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
684
Stacks
80
Followers
981
Followers
119
Votes
66
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Free
  • 9
    Alerts
  • 5
    Service/node/network discovery
  • 5
    Templates
  • 4
    Base metrics from the box
Cons
  • 5
    The UI is in PHP
  • 2
    Puppet module is sluggish
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack
Slack
Jira
Jira
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Grafana
Grafana
Ansible
Ansible
Skype
Skype
Chef
Chef
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
HipChat
HipChat
ServiceNow.com
ServiceNow.com
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, Solarwinds?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana