StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Data Backup
  5. restic vs runrestic

restic vs runrestic

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

restic
restic
Stacks25
Followers21
Votes0
GitHub Stars30.6K
Forks1.7K
runrestic
runrestic
Stacks1
Followers4
Votes0

restic vs runrestic: What are the differences?

Introduction

Restic and runrestic are two popular tools used for backing up and restoring data. While they both serve the purpose of data protection, they have key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore and compare these differences to understand when and why one might be preferred over the other.

  1. Restic: Restic is a command-line tool designed for secure backups. It offers a wide range of features, including deduplication, encryption, and data verification. Restic is known for its simplicity, scalability, and ability to handle large datasets efficiently. It supports various backends for storing backups, such as local disk, SFTP, Amazon S3, and Microsoft Azure Blob Storage.

  2. runrestic: runrestic is a backup solution built on top of restic. It provides a wrapper around restic and simplifies its usage by automating backup tasks and adding additional functionality. runrestic offers features like scheduled backups, retention management, and pruning of backups. It also provides a web-based interface for monitoring and managing backups.

  3. Backup Automation: One key difference between restic and runrestic is backup automation. Restic requires manual execution of backup commands, while runrestic automates the backup process by scheduling and triggering backups at specified intervals. This automation feature of runrestic saves time and effort, especially for regular backups.

  4. Additional Functionality: runrestic offers additional functionality that is not present in restic. It provides a web-based interface for managing backups, allowing users to easily monitor and control the backup process. runrestic also includes retention management and pruning of backups, which helps to optimize storage usage and keep the backup repository tidy.

  5. Ease of Use: While restic is known for its simplicity, runrestic takes it a step further by providing a more user-friendly experience. With runrestic, users don't need to remember and execute complex restic commands manually. The web-based interface and automated backup tasks make runrestic more accessible and convenient, especially for users with limited technical expertise.

  6. Scalability: Restic is designed to handle large datasets efficiently, making it a suitable choice for organizations dealing with extensive data backups. However, runrestic adds an extra layer of scalability by automating the backup process and providing a web-based interface for managing backups. This scalability feature makes runrestic an optimal solution for organizations with multiple users and backup requirements.

In summary, restic and runrestic differ in terms of automation, additional functionality, ease of use, and scalability. Restic is a powerful command-line tool for secure backups, while runrestic is a wrapper around restic that adds automation and a web-based interface. Depending on the specific requirements and preferences, users can choose between these tools to meet their backup and restore needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

restic
restic
runrestic
runrestic

It is a backup program that is fast, efficient and secure. It uses cryptography to guarantee the confidentiality and integrity of your data.

It is a simple Python wrapper script for the Restic backup software that initiates a backup, prunes any old backups according to a retention policy, and validates backups for consistency. The script supports specifying your settings in a declarative configuration file rather than having to put them all on the command-line, and handles common errors.

Secure; Efficient; Free; Cloud-ready
Initiates a backup; Prunes any old backups according to a retention policy; Validates backups for consistency
Statistics
GitHub Stars
30.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
25
Stacks
1
Followers
21
Followers
4
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Linux
Linux
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Windows
Windows
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
OpenBSD
OpenBSD
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
macOS
macOS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to restic, runrestic?

Amazon Glacier

Amazon Glacier

In order to keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for data that is infrequently accessed and for which retrieval times of several hours are suitable. With Amazon Glacier, customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.01 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions.

Veeam Backup & Replication

Veeam Backup & Replication

It is industry-leading Backup & Replication software. It delivers availability for all your cloud, virtual and physical workloads. Through a simple-by-design management console, you can easily achieve fast, flexible and reliable backup, recovery and replication for all your applications and data.

Borg

Borg

It is a deduplicating backup program. It provides an efficient and secure way to backup data. The data deduplication technique used makes it suitable for daily backups since only changes are stored. The authenticated encryption technique makes it suitable for backups to not fully trusted targets.

AWS Storage Gateway

AWS Storage Gateway

The AWS Storage Gateway is a service connecting an on-premises software appliance with cloud-based storage. Once the AWS Storage Gateway’s software appliance is installed on a local host, you can mount Storage Gateway volumes to your on-premises application servers as iSCSI devices, enabling a wide variety of systems and applications to make use of them. Data written to these volumes is maintained on your on-premises storage hardware while being asynchronously backed up to AWS, where it is stored in Amazon Glacier or in Amazon S3 in the form of Amazon EBS snapshots. Snapshots are encrypted to make sure that customers do not have to worry about encrypting sensitive data themselves. When customers need to retrieve data, they can restore snapshots locally, or create Amazon EBS volumes from snapshots for use with applications running in Amazon EC2. It provides low-latency performance by maintaining frequently accessed data on-premises while securely storing all of your data encrypted.

Afi

Afi

Afi.ai is the latest generation of data protection for M365, Google Workspace & Kubernetes. Clean & responsive UI, easy to use SLA-based protection settings, and 2-3x better backup/restore performance compared to legacy vendors.

RainyDay Backup

RainyDay Backup

RainyDay Backup offers an easily configurable system that enables you to back up your Azure DevOps source code, Work Items and NuGet artifacts and more.

Cohesity

Cohesity

It allows IT professionals to backup, manage and gain insights from their data, across multiple systems or cloud providers.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

It minimizes downtime and data loss with fast, reliable recovery of on-premises and cloud-based applications using affordable storage, minimal compute, and point-in-time recovery.

EaseUS

EaseUS

It is a leading software provider for partition manager, data backup, and recovery.

Backrightup

Backrightup

It is a 1-click backup for Azure Devops. It gives you peace of mind that you can recover from any ransomware, malicious or accidental data deletion.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope