Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Puppeteer

654
582
+ 1
26
TestCafe

194
273
+ 1
26
Add tool

Puppeteer vs TestCafe: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Puppeteer and TestCafe, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Cross-Browser Support: Puppeteer primarily focuses on Google Chrome and its browser version. However, TestCafe supports multiple browsers out of the box, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer. This makes TestCafe a better choice when aiming for cross-platform compatibility and wider browser coverage.

  2. Architecture: Puppeteer is a Node.js library that relies on the Chrome DevTools Protocol to control Chrome or Chromium browsers. On the other hand, TestCafe is built on top of JavaScript and does not require any browser plugins or additional dependencies for test execution. This makes TestCafe easier to set up and use compared to Puppeteer.

  3. Page Interactions: Puppeteer allows low-level control of pages, enabling actions such as keyboard input, mouse clicks, and navigation. TestCafe, however, provides higher-level abstractions for these interactions, making it simpler to write tests without the need for extensive JavaScript knowledge or handling details of browser-specific APIs.

  4. Parallel Test Execution: TestCafe inherently supports parallel test execution, allowing tests to run concurrently across multiple browsers or instances. Puppeteer, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for parallel execution, and achieving parallelism requires additional configuration and implementation.

  5. Test Isolation: TestCafe is designed to run each test in a separate browser instance, ensuring complete isolation between test cases. This eliminates any cross-contamination of data or state between tests. Puppeteer, although offering similar capabilities, does not enforce test isolation by default and requires explicit handling to achieve isolation.

  6. TestCafe Cloud Testing: TestCafe provides a cloud testing service called TestCafe Studio, which allows users to execute tests on remote machines or virtual machines in the cloud. Puppeteer, in contrast, does not offer a cloud testing solution natively.

In summary, TestCafe offers better cross-browser support, simpler architecture, higher-level abstractions for page interactions, built-in parallel test execution, test isolation by default, and a cloud testing option, making it a more versatile and comprehensive automation framework compared to Puppeteer.

Advice on Puppeteer and TestCafe
Ankur Loriya
Needs advice
on
PhantomJSPhantomJS
and
PuppeteerPuppeteer

I am using Node 12 for server scripting and have a function to generate PDF and send it to a browser. Currently, we are using PhantomJS to generate a PDF. Some web post shows that we can achieve PDF generation using Puppeteer. I was a bit confused. Should we move to puppeteerJS? Which one is better with NodeJS for generating PDF?

See more
Replies (2)
Recommends
on
PuppeteerPuppeteer

You better go with puppeteer. It is basically chrome automation tool, written in nodejs. So what you get is PDF, generated by chrome itself. I guess there is hardly better PDF generation tool for the web. Phantomjs is already more or less outdated as technology. It uses some old webkit port that's quite behind in terms of standards and features. It can be replaced with puppeteer for every single task.

See more
Recommends
on
PuppeteerPuppeteer

I suggest puppeteer to go for. It is simple and easy to set up. Only limitaiton is it can be used only for chrome browser and currently they are looking into expanding into FF. The next thing is Playwright which is just a scale up of Puppeteer. It supports cross browsers.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Puppeteer
Pros of TestCafe
  • 10
    Very well documented
  • 10
    Scriptable web browser
  • 6
    Promise based
  • 8
    Cross-browser testing
  • 4
    Open source
  • 4
    Easy setup/installation
  • 4
    Built in waits
  • 3
    UI End to End testing
  • 2
    Supports Devices without extra software/package
  • 1
    Both client and server side debug

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Puppeteer
Cons of TestCafe
  • 10
    Chrome only
  • 9
    No longer free

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Puppeteer?

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

What is TestCafe?

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Puppeteer?
What companies use TestCafe?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Puppeteer?
What tools integrate with TestCafe?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Puppeteer and TestCafe?
Chef
Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Salt
Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.
Puppet Labs
Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.
Ansible
Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
See all alternatives