Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Puppeteer vs TestCafe: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Puppeteer and TestCafe, highlighting their key differences.
Cross-Browser Support: Puppeteer primarily focuses on Google Chrome and its browser version. However, TestCafe supports multiple browsers out of the box, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer. This makes TestCafe a better choice when aiming for cross-platform compatibility and wider browser coverage.
Architecture: Puppeteer is a Node.js library that relies on the Chrome DevTools Protocol to control Chrome or Chromium browsers. On the other hand, TestCafe is built on top of JavaScript and does not require any browser plugins or additional dependencies for test execution. This makes TestCafe easier to set up and use compared to Puppeteer.
Page Interactions: Puppeteer allows low-level control of pages, enabling actions such as keyboard input, mouse clicks, and navigation. TestCafe, however, provides higher-level abstractions for these interactions, making it simpler to write tests without the need for extensive JavaScript knowledge or handling details of browser-specific APIs.
Parallel Test Execution: TestCafe inherently supports parallel test execution, allowing tests to run concurrently across multiple browsers or instances. Puppeteer, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for parallel execution, and achieving parallelism requires additional configuration and implementation.
Test Isolation: TestCafe is designed to run each test in a separate browser instance, ensuring complete isolation between test cases. This eliminates any cross-contamination of data or state between tests. Puppeteer, although offering similar capabilities, does not enforce test isolation by default and requires explicit handling to achieve isolation.
TestCafe Cloud Testing: TestCafe provides a cloud testing service called TestCafe Studio, which allows users to execute tests on remote machines or virtual machines in the cloud. Puppeteer, in contrast, does not offer a cloud testing solution natively.
In summary, TestCafe offers better cross-browser support, simpler architecture, higher-level abstractions for page interactions, built-in parallel test execution, test isolation by default, and a cloud testing option, making it a more versatile and comprehensive automation framework compared to Puppeteer.
I am using Node 12 for server scripting and have a function to generate PDF and send it to a browser. Currently, we are using PhantomJS to generate a PDF. Some web post shows that we can achieve PDF generation using Puppeteer. I was a bit confused. Should we move to puppeteerJS? Which one is better with NodeJS for generating PDF?
You better go with puppeteer. It is basically chrome automation tool, written in nodejs. So what you get is PDF, generated by chrome itself. I guess there is hardly better PDF generation tool for the web. Phantomjs is already more or less outdated as technology. It uses some old webkit port that's quite behind in terms of standards and features. It can be replaced with puppeteer for every single task.
I suggest puppeteer to go for. It is simple and easy to set up. Only limitaiton is it can be used only for chrome browser and currently they are looking into expanding into FF. The next thing is Playwright which is just a scale up of Puppeteer. It supports cross browsers.
Pros of Puppeteer
- Very well documented10
- Scriptable web browser10
- Promise based6
Pros of TestCafe
- Cross-browser testing8
- Open source4
- Easy setup/installation4
- Built in waits4
- UI End to End testing3
- Supports Devices without extra software/package2
- Both client and server side debug1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Puppeteer
- Chrome only10
Cons of TestCafe
- No longer free9