Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Puppet Labs vs Rundeck: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Puppet Labs and Rundeck, highlighting their key differences.
Deployment Automation: Puppet Labs focuses on infrastructure as code and automates the deployment and management of software and configurations, enabling continuous delivery. On the other hand, Rundeck primarily focuses on job scheduling and execution across various servers and systems, streamlining operational tasks and enhancing productivity.
Configuration Language: Puppet Labs uses a declarative configuration language known as Puppet language, which allows defining desired states and lets the Puppet agent apply the necessary configurations to achieve those states. In contrast, Rundeck uses a procedural configuration language that enables executing specific commands and scripts to perform tasks.
Orchestration Capabilities: Puppet Labs offers limited orchestration capabilities that mainly revolve around managing infrastructure and configurations. Rundeck, on the other hand, provides extensive orchestration features, allowing users to define complex workflows, parallel execution, and handle dependencies between jobs.
Scalability and Performance: Puppet Labs is designed to handle large-scale infrastructures with hundreds or thousands of nodes, providing high scalability and performance. Rundeck, although it can handle large environments, is more suitable for smaller to medium-sized infrastructures due to some limitations in performance and scalability.
User Interface: Puppet Labs provides a web-based user interface, Puppet Enterprise Console, which offers a graphical representation of infrastructure and configurations. Rundeck also offers a web-based user interface that focuses on job scheduling and execution, providing a clean and intuitive user experience.
Integration and Extensibility: Puppet Labs has a rich ecosystem with a wide range of integrations and modules available for managing various technologies and systems. Rundeck also has a plugin system that allows extending its capabilities and integrating with external tools, but it may have a more limited selection of integrations compared to Puppet Labs.
In summary, Puppet Labs excels in infrastructure automation and configuration management, while Rundeck specializes in job scheduling, execution, and orchestration workflows, with a more procedural approach.
I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)
I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.
The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.
I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.
The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.
If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate
Pros of Puppet Labs
- Devops52
- Automate it44
- Reusable components26
- Dynamic and idempotent server configuration21
- Great community18
- Very scalable12
- Cloud management12
- Easy to maintain10
- Free tier9
- Works with Amazon EC26
- Declarative4
- Ruby4
- Works with Azure3
- Works with OpenStack3
- Nginx2
- Ease of use1
Pros of Rundeck
- Role based access control3
- Easy to understand3
- Doesn't need containers1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Puppet Labs
- Steep learning curve3
- Customs types idempotence1
Cons of Rundeck
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Puppet Labs?
What is Rundeck?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Puppet Labs?
What companies use Rundeck?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Puppet Labs?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+42
+42