StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. Protractor vs TestCafe

Protractor vs TestCafe

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Protractor
Protractor
Stacks2.2K
Followers543
Votes33
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks2.3K
TestCafe
TestCafe
Stacks262
Followers273
Votes26
GitHub Stars9.9K
Forks678

Protractor vs TestCafe: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Browser support**: Protractor is specifically designed for Angular applications and works best with Angular websites, while TestCafe is more versatile and can test any web application regardless of the framework being used.
2. **API simplification**: Protractor has a more complex API which can sometimes lead to confusion and difficulties for beginners, whereas TestCafe offers a simpler and more intuitive API making it easier for users to write and maintain tests.
3. **Programming language**: Protractor uses JavaScript for writing test scripts, which can be limiting for teams that prefer working with other programming languages, whereas TestCafe supports multiple programming languages like JavaScript, TypeScript, and CoffeeScript.
4. **Cross-browser testing**: TestCafe has built-in support for parallel testing across multiple browsers, making it easier to perform cross-browser testing, while Protractor lacks this feature and requires additional setup for parallel testing.
5. **Installation process**: Protractor requires the installation of WebDriver and Selenium server, adding complexity to the setup process, whereas TestCafe has a simpler installation process with no additional dependencies needed.
6. **Performance**: TestCafe is known for its faster execution speed compared to Protractor, making it a more efficient choice for large test suites or time-sensitive projects.

In Summary, Protractor is more tailored towards Angular applications with a slightly more complex API and limited language support, while TestCafe offers versatility, simplicity, and faster performance for web application testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Protractor, TestCafe

Yildiz
Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSTypeScriptTypeScriptCypressCypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Protractor
Protractor
TestCafe
TestCafe

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Test Like a User; For Angular Apps; Automatic Waiting
Create stable tests (and no manual timeouts); Write in latest JS or TypeScript; Detect JS errors in your code; Launch concurrent tests; Build readable tests with PageObject; Include tests in continuous integration system; Rapid test development
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Stars
9.9K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
678
Stacks
2.2K
Stacks
262
Followers
543
Followers
273
Votes
33
Votes
26
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Quick tests implementation
  • 6
    Flexible
  • 5
    Promise support
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 4
    Limited
Pros
  • 8
    Cross-browser testing
  • 4
    Open source
  • 4
    Easy setup/installation
  • 4
    Built in waits
  • 3
    UI End to End testing
Cons
  • 9
    No longer free
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Angular
Angular
TypeScript
TypeScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
Jenkins
Jenkins
Travis CI
Travis CI
TeamCity
TeamCity

What are some alternatives to Protractor, TestCafe?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana