Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Prepros vs Webpack: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Prepros and Webpack
Build systems: Prepros is primarily a static site generator that focuses on preprocessing tasks such as compiling Sass, Less, Stylus, and CoffeeScript, optimizing images, and refreshing browsers automatically. On the other hand, Webpack is a module bundler that efficiently packages and manages JavaScript modules along with their dependencies, providing advanced capabilities like code splitting, lazy loading, and hot module replacement.
Configuration: Prepros has a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows developers to configure project settings through a visual interface, making it easier to set up and manage projects without diving into complex configuration files. Webpack, on the other hand, requires developers to create a configuration file (typically named webpack.config.js) where they define various aspects of the build process, such as entry points, loaders, plugins, and output settings.
Extensibility: Prepros offers a limited number of built-in features and does not provide an official plugin system, limiting the extensibility options for developers. Webpack, on the other hand, has a rich ecosystem of plugins and loaders that can be easily integrated into the build process, allowing developers to customize every aspect of the bundling and optimization process according to their specific needs.
Code Splitting: Prepros does not offer built-in code splitting capabilities, which means that all the JavaScript and CSS files are typically bundled into a single file. In contrast, Webpack provides native support for code splitting, allowing developers to split their code into multiple smaller chunks that can be loaded on-demand, resulting in faster initial page loads and reduced bandwidth usage.
Hot Module Replacement (HMR): Prepros does not support hot module replacement, which is a feature that allows developers to update modules in real time without refreshing the entire page during development. In Webpack, HMR is built-in and can be easily configured, improving the development workflow by enabling faster iteration and providing instant feedback on code changes.
Community Support: Prepros has a smaller user community compared to Webpack, which means that finding help, documentation, and community-created plugins or loaders might be more challenging. Webpack, being widely adopted and actively developed by a large community, offers extensive documentation, tutorials, forums, and a wide range of third-party plugins and loaders, making it easier to find support and resources when facing issues or trying to implement advanced features.
In Summary, Prepros is a user-friendly tool primarily focused on preprocessing tasks, while Webpack is a powerful module bundler offering advanced features like code splitting, hot module replacement, and extensive customization options through its configuration file and plugin system. Webpack's larger community and ecosystem make it a popular choice for complex build processes and highly modular applications.
I could define the next points why we have to migrate:
- Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
- Also
jspm install
takes much more time thannpm install
. - Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.
Pros of Prepros
- Easy to use4
- Beautiful GUI4
- Easy to configure4
- FTP upload3
- Freemium2
- Live reload2
- Any editor OK2
Pros of Webpack
- Most powerful bundler309
- Built-in dev server with livereload182
- Can handle all types of assets142
- Easy configuration87
- Laravel-mix22
- Overengineered, Underdeveloped4
- Makes it easy to bundle static assets2
- Webpack-Encore2
- Redundant1
- Better support in Browser Dev-Tools1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Prepros
Cons of Webpack
- Hard to configure15
- No clear direction5
- Spaghetti-Code out of the box2
- SystemJS integration is quite lackluster2
- Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)2
- Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers2