StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Prepros vs Webpack

Prepros vs Webpack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K
Prepros
Prepros
Stacks23
Followers39
Votes21

Prepros vs Webpack: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Prepros and Webpack

  1. Build systems: Prepros is primarily a static site generator that focuses on preprocessing tasks such as compiling Sass, Less, Stylus, and CoffeeScript, optimizing images, and refreshing browsers automatically. On the other hand, Webpack is a module bundler that efficiently packages and manages JavaScript modules along with their dependencies, providing advanced capabilities like code splitting, lazy loading, and hot module replacement.

  2. Configuration: Prepros has a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows developers to configure project settings through a visual interface, making it easier to set up and manage projects without diving into complex configuration files. Webpack, on the other hand, requires developers to create a configuration file (typically named webpack.config.js) where they define various aspects of the build process, such as entry points, loaders, plugins, and output settings.

  3. Extensibility: Prepros offers a limited number of built-in features and does not provide an official plugin system, limiting the extensibility options for developers. Webpack, on the other hand, has a rich ecosystem of plugins and loaders that can be easily integrated into the build process, allowing developers to customize every aspect of the bundling and optimization process according to their specific needs.

  4. Code Splitting: Prepros does not offer built-in code splitting capabilities, which means that all the JavaScript and CSS files are typically bundled into a single file. In contrast, Webpack provides native support for code splitting, allowing developers to split their code into multiple smaller chunks that can be loaded on-demand, resulting in faster initial page loads and reduced bandwidth usage.

  5. Hot Module Replacement (HMR): Prepros does not support hot module replacement, which is a feature that allows developers to update modules in real time without refreshing the entire page during development. In Webpack, HMR is built-in and can be easily configured, improving the development workflow by enabling faster iteration and providing instant feedback on code changes.

  6. Community Support: Prepros has a smaller user community compared to Webpack, which means that finding help, documentation, and community-created plugins or loaders might be more challenging. Webpack, being widely adopted and actively developed by a large community, offers extensive documentation, tutorials, forums, and a wide range of third-party plugins and loaders, making it easier to find support and resources when facing issues or trying to implement advanced features.

In Summary, Prepros is a user-friendly tool primarily focused on preprocessing tasks, while Webpack is a powerful module bundler offering advanced features like code splitting, hot module replacement, and extensive customization options through its configuration file and plugin system. Webpack's larger community and ecosystem make it a popular choice for complex build processes and highly modular applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Webpack, Prepros

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Webpack
Webpack
Prepros
Prepros

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

It is an interface tool which handles pre-processing, and other front-end tasks. Its greatest strength is the incredible ease with which it allows you to use pre-processors of various kinds, be they for CSS, HTML or JavaScript.

Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
Find Out Errors At a Glance; Live Reload; Minify & Optimize; Network Preview; Browser Sync
Statistics
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
45.0K
Stacks
23
Followers
28.1K
Followers
39
Votes
752
Votes
21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
  • 2
    Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
  • 2
    Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Easy to configure
  • 4
    Beautiful GUI
  • 3
    FTP upload
  • 2
    Freemium
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
CoffeeScript
CoffeeScript
Slim
Slim
Less
Less
Pug
Pug
Markdown
Markdown
Stylus
Stylus
macOS
macOS
Jade Language
Jade Language

What are some alternatives to Webpack, Prepros?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

CodeKit

CodeKit

Process Less, Sass, Stylus, Jade, Haml, Slim, CoffeeScript, Javascript, and Compass files automatically each time you save. Easily set options for each language.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

LiveReload

LiveReload

LiveReload monitors changes in the file system. As soon as you save a file, it is preprocessed as needed, and the browser is refreshed.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana