Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Pingy CLI vs Webpack: What are the differences?
Introduction: In the context of website development tools, Pingy CLI and Webpack are both popular choices. Understanding the key differences between these two tools can help developers make informed decisions on which one to use for their projects.
Configuration Complexity: Pingy CLI is designed to have zero configuration, making it a straightforward choice for beginners or those looking for a simple setup. On the other hand, Webpack requires more configuration and setup, which can be overwhelming for beginners or small projects.
Performance: When it comes to performance, Pingy CLI tends to be faster in terms of build times compared to Webpack. This is because Pingy CLI has a minimalistic approach and focuses on speed and efficiency in project builds.
Plugin Ecosystem: Webpack has a vast and robust ecosystem of plugins that offer extensive customization options for developers. Pingy CLI, on the other hand, has a limited number of plugins available, which may restrict the flexibility and customization potential of projects.
Community Support: Webpack has a large and active community of developers, which means there are plenty of resources, tutorials, and forums available for troubleshooting and support. Pingy CLI, being a newer tool, may have a smaller community at the moment, which could impact the level of support and resources available.
Ease of Use: Pingy CLI is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive commands, making it a straightforward tool for beginners to pick up and start using. In contrast, Webpack has a steeper learning curve due to its complex configuration and setup process, which may require more time and effort to master.
Out-of-the-Box Features: Pingy CLI includes a range of built-in features and tools that are commonly used in modern web development, such as hot module reloading and CSS preprocessing. Webpack, while powerful, may require additional configurations or plugins to achieve similar functionalities.
In Summary, Pingy CLI and Webpack differ in terms of configuration complexity, performance, plugin ecosystem, community support, ease of use, and out-of-the-box features, offering developers a choice based on their specific project requirements.
The developer experience Webpack gave us was not delighting anyone. It works and is stable and consistent. It is also slow and frustrating. We decided to check out Vite as an alternative when moving to Vue 3 and have been amazed. It is very early in development and there are plenty of rough edges, but it has been a breath of fresh air not waiting for anything to update. It is so fast we have found ourselves using devtools in browser less because changing styles is just as fast in code. We felt confident using the tool because although it is early in its development, the production build is still provided by Rollup which is a mature tool. We also felt optimistic that as good as it is right now, it will only continue to get better, as it is being worked on very actively. So far we are really happy with the choice.
I could define the next points why we have to migrate:
- Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
- Also
jspm installtakes much more time thannpm install. - Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.
Pros of Pingy CLI
- Simple2
- No Configuration2
- Fast2
- Easy2
- No plugins needed2
- Just works2
Pros of Webpack
- Most powerful bundler309
- Built-in dev server with livereload182
- Can handle all types of assets142
- Easy configuration87
- Laravel-mix22
- Overengineered, Underdeveloped4
- Makes it easy to bundle static assets2
- Webpack-Encore2
- Redundant1
- Better support in Browser Dev-Tools1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Pingy CLI
Cons of Webpack
- Hard to configure15
- No clear direction5
- Spaghetti-Code out of the box2
- SystemJS integration is quite lackluster2
- Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)2
- Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers2
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Pingy CLI?
What is Webpack?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Pingy CLI?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Pingy CLI?
What tools integrate with Webpack?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+31
+46
+39
+43+42+27