StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. OpenStack vs Salt

OpenStack vs Salt

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Salt
Salt
Stacks410
Followers449
Votes165
GitHub Stars14.9K
Forks5.6K
OpenStack
OpenStack
Stacks790
Followers1.2K
Votes138

OpenStack vs Salt: What are the differences?

Introduction

OpenStack and Salt are both popular open-source technologies used in software development and infrastructure management. While they may have some common features, there are key differences between the two that distinguish their functionalities and use cases.

  1. Architecture: OpenStack is a cloud computing platform that provides a range of services for building and managing cloud infrastructure, including compute, storage, and networking resources. It is designed to create and manage virtual machines and infrastructure as a service (IaaS) environments. On the other hand, Salt is a configuration management and remote execution tool that focuses on managing the configuration of systems and automating tasks across a network. It is based on a master-minion architecture and uses a client-server model.

  2. Scope: OpenStack is primarily used for creating and managing cloud environments, allowing users to set up and control virtualized resources such as virtual machines, networks, and storage. It provides a comprehensive set of services for cloud infrastructure management. Salt, on the other hand, is more focused on configuration management and automation. It enables system administrators to define and deploy configurations across a network and perform remote execution commands on multiple systems at once.

  3. Target Audience: OpenStack is typically used by cloud service providers and organizations that require a flexible and scalable cloud infrastructure platform. It caters to a wide range of users, including developers, system administrators, and end-users who utilize cloud services. Salt, on the other hand, is more commonly used by system administrators and DevOps teams who need to manage and automate configurations on a network of systems.

  4. Resource Management: OpenStack provides a sophisticated set of resource management capabilities, allowing users to provision, allocate, and manage virtualized resources such as virtual machines, storage volumes, and networks. It includes features like quota management and advanced scheduling algorithms. Salt, although it can manage resources to a certain extent, primarily focuses on system configuration management and automation rather than resource allocation and management.

  5. Workflow: OpenStack typically follows a predefined workflow for managing cloud resources. It involves creating instances, networks, and storage using predefined templates and workflows. On the other hand, Salt follows a more dynamic and flexible workflow for system configuration management. It allows users to define and apply configurations using YAML or Jinja templates and execute commands across multiple systems using a declarative approach.

  6. Integration: OpenStack provides integration with a wide range of complementary software and services, such as virtualization platforms, storage systems, and networking technologies. It is designed to work seamlessly with other infrastructure components to provide a comprehensive cloud solution. Salt, on the other hand, integrates well with various automation tools and can be easily integrated into existing infrastructure management systems. It also supports a wide range of operating systems and platforms.

In summary, OpenStack is a cloud computing platform for building and managing cloud infrastructure, while Salt is a configuration management and automation tool. OpenStack focuses on providing a comprehensive set of services for cloud resource management, while Salt specializes in system configuration management and remote execution.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Salt
Salt
OpenStack
OpenStack

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

Remote execution is the core function of Salt. Running pre-defined or arbitrary commands on remote hosts.;Salt modules are the core of remote execution. They provide functionality such as installing packages, restarting a service, running a remote command, transferring files, and infinitely more;Building on the remote execution core is a robust and flexible configuration management framework. Execution happens on the minions allowing effortless, simultaneous configuration of tens of thousands of hosts.
Compute;Storage;Networking;Dashboard;Shared Services
Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
410
Stacks
790
Followers
449
Followers
1.2K
Votes
165
Votes
138
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 47
    Flexible
  • 30
    Easy
  • 27
    Remote execution
  • 24
    Enormously flexible
  • 12
    Great plugin API
Cons
  • 1
    Dangerous
  • 1
    Bloated
  • 1
    No immutable infrastructure
Pros
  • 60
    Private cloud
  • 39
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 23
    Flexible in use
  • 7
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Robust architecture

What are some alternatives to Salt, OpenStack?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Apache CloudStack

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Webmin

Webmin

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana