StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. Octopus Deploy vs Salt

Octopus Deploy vs Salt

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Salt
Salt
Stacks410
Followers449
Votes165
GitHub Stars14.9K
Forks5.6K
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Stacks407
Followers493
Votes118

Octopus Deploy vs Salt: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Deployment Process**:
Octopus Deploy focuses on simplifying the deployment process by providing a user-friendly interface and step-by-step guides for creating and managing deployments. In contrast, Salt is more oriented towards configuration management and automation, offering powerful features for managing large-scale infrastructures and enforcing desired states on systems.

2. **Supported Platforms**:
Octopus Deploy is primarily designed for Windows environments, providing seamless integration with technologies commonly used in the Microsoft ecosystem. On the other hand, Salt is platform-agnostic, offering robust support for various operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it a versatile solution for heterogeneous IT environments.

3. **Scalability**:
While Octopus Deploy is well-suited for small to medium-sized organizations due to its ease of use and quick setup, Salt is preferred by larger enterprises for its scalability and ability to handle thousands of servers with ease. Salt's distributed architecture and master-minion setup make it ideal for managing complex infrastructures at scale.

4. **Configuration Management vs. Deployment**:
Octopus Deploy primarily focuses on deployment automation, allowing users to define deployment processes and execute them efficiently. In contrast, Salt emphasizes configuration management by enabling users to define and enforce the desired state of systems, ensuring consistency and compliance across the entire infrastructure.

5. **Agent-based vs. Agentless**:
Octopus Deploy utilizes agents installed on target machines to execute deployment tasks, providing tighter control and monitoring capabilities. In contrast, Salt adopts an agentless architecture where commands are executed remotely over secure channels, reducing the overhead of deploying and maintaining agents on each system.

6. **Community Support and Ecosystem**:
Octopus Deploy has a thriving community and marketplace offering a wide range of plugins and integrations to extend its capabilities. Salt, on the other hand, boasts a larger open-source community contributing to its ecosystem, providing a rich library of modules and states for automating various tasks and managing diverse infrastructure configurations.

In Summary, Octopus Deploy and Salt differ in their focus on deployment automation vs. configuration management, platform support, scalability, agent-based vs. agentless architecture, and community ecosystem, catering to different organizational needs and IT environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Salt
Salt
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Remote execution is the core function of Salt. Running pre-defined or arbitrary commands on remote hosts.;Salt modules are the core of remote execution. They provide functionality such as installing packages, restarting a service, running a remote command, transferring files, and infinitely more;Building on the remote execution core is a robust and flexible configuration management framework. Execution happens on the minions allowing effortless, simultaneous configuration of tens of thousands of hosts.
Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely;.NET, Java, PHP, Node, Ruby;Full API support;Approvals and manual intervention;Enable self-service deployments;Installs in minutes;Integrates with your build server;Free for small teams
Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
410
Stacks
407
Followers
449
Followers
493
Votes
165
Votes
118
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 47
    Flexible
  • 30
    Easy
  • 27
    Remote execution
  • 24
    Enormously flexible
  • 12
    Great plugin API
Cons
  • 1
    Dangerous
  • 1
    Bloated
  • 1
    No immutable infrastructure
Pros
  • 30
    Powerful
  • 25
    Simplicity
  • 20
    Easy to learn
  • 17
    .Net oriented
  • 14
    Easy to manage releases and rollback
Cons
  • 4
    Poor UI
  • 2
    Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)
  • 2
    Management of Config
Integrations
No integrations available
Jenkins
Jenkins
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jira
Jira
Appveyor
Appveyor
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Salt, Octopus Deploy?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

Distelli

Distelli

Build, test, and deploy your code from GitHub and BitBucket (or no repository at all) to any server in the world regardless of provider. Distelli customers iterate and ship faster with complete transparency.

cPanel

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana