StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Front End Package Manager
  5. Verdaccio vs npm

Verdaccio vs npm

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

npm
npm
Stacks137.4K
Followers82.2K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars17.6K
Forks3.0K
Verdaccio
Verdaccio
Stacks83
Followers47
Votes4
GitHub Stars17.3K
Forks1.4K

Verdaccio vs npm: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of JavaScript development, package managers play a crucial role in managing dependencies and facilitating the sharing and reusability of code. Two popular package managers in the JavaScript ecosystem are Verdaccio and npm. While both serve the same purpose of managing packages, there are some key differences between them that are worth exploring.

  1. Registry Hosting Model: Verdaccio provides a local, private registry hosting model where developers can create their own private registry for their organization. This allows for better control over package management and ensures that sensitive code is not exposed to the public. On the other hand, npm is a public registry that hosts packages that are accessible to everyone.

  2. Scalability: Verdaccio is designed to be scalable and can handle a large number of packages and users. It offers a caching mechanism, enabling faster package installations and reducing server load. npm, being a public registry, also handles a massive amount of packages, but its scalability is primarily managed by npm Inc.

  3. Authentication and Authorization: Verdaccio offers built-in authentication and authorization mechanisms, allowing developers to control access to their private registries. It supports various authentication providers like LDAP, Active Directory, GitHub, etc. On the other hand, npm relies on user accounts that are managed by npm Inc., and access to private packages is controlled through the use of tokens or organizations.

  4. Customization: Verdaccio allows for extensive customization of its user interface, user experience, and functionality through the use of plugins, hooks, and custom themes. Developers can tailor their private registry to meet their specific needs. npm, being a public registry, offers limited customization options, as it provides a standardized interface that caters to a wider audience.

  5. Offline Mode: Verdaccio has built-in support for offline mode, allowing developers to work with packages when they have limited or no internet connectivity. It allows users to install, publish, and search packages locally without the need to access the internet. npm, being an online registry, requires a constant internet connection to search, install, and publish packages.

  6. Community Support: npm boasts a large and active community of developers and maintainers. It is widely adopted and has extensive resources, documentation, and third-party integrations available. Verdaccio, while it has its own community, may have a smaller user base and limited resources compared to npm.

In Summary, the key differences between Verdaccio and npm lie in their hosting model, scalability, authentication and authorization mechanisms, customization options, offline mode support, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on npm, Verdaccio

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsnpmnpmYarnYarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k
Comments
Mark
Mark

CTO at Gemsotec bvba

Apr 25, 2019

ReviewonReactReactTypeScriptTypeScriptYarnYarn

I use npm because I also mainly use React and TypeScript. Since several typings (from DefinitelyTyped) depend on the React typings, Yarn tends to mess up which leads to duplicate libraries present (different versions of the same type definition), which hinders the Typescript compiler. Npm always resolves to a single version per transitive dependency. At least that's my experience with both.

251k views251k
Comments
Oleksandr
Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

npm
npm
Verdaccio
Verdaccio

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

-
Simple Configuration; Uplinks; Package Access; Authentication; Notifications; Logger; Web User Interface; Open source
Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.6K
GitHub Stars
17.3K
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
1.4K
Stacks
137.4K
Stacks
83
Followers
82.2K
Followers
47
Votes
1.6K
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 648
    Best package management system for javascript
  • 382
    Open-source
  • 327
    Great community
  • 148
    More packages than rubygems, pypi, or packagist
  • 112
    Nice people matter
Cons
  • 5
    Bad at package versioning and being deterministic
  • 5
    Problems with lockfiles
  • 3
    Node-gyp takes forever
  • 1
    Super slow
Pros
  • 2
    "Easy to setup"
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    "A lightweight NPM registry"
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker
Chef
Chef
CircleCI
CircleCI
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Travis CI
Travis CI
Ansible
Ansible
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
GitLab CI
GitLab CI

What are some alternatives to npm, Verdaccio?

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

pip

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

Duo

Duo

Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.

Pika.dev

Pika.dev

It is a new kind of package registry for the modern web. It handles formatting, configuring, building and publishing every package on the registry, so that individual authors don't have to.

Bundler

Bundler

It provides a consistent environment for Ruby projects by tracking and installing the exact gems and versions that are needed. It is an exit from dependency hell, and ensures that the gems you need are present in development, staging, and production.

Browserify-CDN

Browserify-CDN

Browsers don't have the require method defined, but Node.js does. With Browserify you can write code that uses require in the same way that you would use it in Node.

Entropic

Entropic

It is a new package registry with a new CLI, designed to be easy to stand up inside your network. It features an entirely new file-centric API and a content-addressable storage system that attempts to minimize the amount of data you must retrieve over a network. This file-centric approach also applies to the publication API.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana