StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Front End Package Manager
  5. Sitespeed.io vs npm

Sitespeed.io vs npm

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

npm
npm
Stacks137.4K
Followers82.2K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars17.6K
Forks3.0K
Sitespeed.io
Sitespeed.io
Stacks41
Followers82
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.9K
Forks615

Sitespeed.io vs npm: What are the differences?

Introduction: Key Differences between Sitespeed.io and npm:

  1. Functionality: Sitespeed.io is a tool used for web performance testing and monitoring, focusing on metrics like speed, performance, and quality, while npm is a package manager for JavaScript that aids in the installation of libraries and dependencies for projects.

  2. Usage: Sitespeed.io is primarily used for analyzing website performance, identifying areas for improvement, and monitoring changes over time, whereas npm is used for managing project dependencies, running scripts, and sharing code with others within the JavaScript community.

  3. Metrics: Sitespeed.io provides in-depth metrics related to page load times, performance scores, resource sizes, and more, enabling users to optimize their websites for better user experience, whereas npm focuses on managing package versions, script execution, dependency resolution, and package distribution within projects.

  4. Output: Sitespeed.io generates detailed reports, visualizations, and insights based on web performance metrics, helping users make data-driven decisions to enhance website speed and quality, while npm generates logs, warnings, and errors related to package installations, script executions, and dependency management within projects.

  5. Community Support: Sitespeed.io has a community of developers, performance engineers, and web professionals who contribute to its development, provide support, and share best practices for web performance optimization, whereas npm has a vast community of JavaScript developers, maintainers, and contributors who create, maintain, and share packages, scripts, and resources for the JavaScript ecosystem.

  6. Installation Process: Sitespeed.io requires installation through npm and additional dependencies for certain features like browsers and plugins, whereas npm itself is installed as a standalone package manager tool for JavaScript projects, making it easy for developers to get started with managing dependencies and running scripts within their projects.

In Summary, Sitespeed.io is focused on web performance testing and monitoring, while npm is a package manager for JavaScript dependencies, serving different purposes within the development workflow.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on npm, Sitespeed.io

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsnpmnpmYarnYarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k
Comments
Mark
Mark

CTO at Gemsotec bvba

Apr 25, 2019

ReviewonReactReactTypeScriptTypeScriptYarnYarn

I use npm because I also mainly use React and TypeScript. Since several typings (from DefinitelyTyped) depend on the React typings, Yarn tends to mess up which leads to duplicate libraries present (different versions of the same type definition), which hinders the Typescript compiler. Npm always resolves to a single version per transitive dependency. At least that's my experience with both.

251k views251k
Comments
Oleksandr
Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

npm
npm
Sitespeed.io
Sitespeed.io

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Analyze your website speed and performance based on performance best practices and timing metrics. You can run it using Docker, test your site in Chrome and Firefox and graph the metrics in Grafana.

-
Performance dashboard;Performance budget;Real browsers;Speed Index;Chrome;Firefox;WebPageTest
Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.6K
GitHub Stars
4.9K
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
615
Stacks
137.4K
Stacks
41
Followers
82.2K
Followers
82
Votes
1.6K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 648
    Best package management system for javascript
  • 382
    Open-source
  • 327
    Great community
  • 148
    More packages than rubygems, pypi, or packagist
  • 112
    Nice people matter
Cons
  • 5
    Bad at package versioning and being deterministic
  • 5
    Problems with lockfiles
  • 3
    Node-gyp takes forever
  • 1
    Super slow
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to npm, Sitespeed.io?

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Verdaccio

Verdaccio

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

pip

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

Duo

Duo

Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.

Pika.dev

Pika.dev

It is a new kind of package registry for the modern web. It handles formatting, configuring, building and publishing every package on the registry, so that individual authors don't have to.

H2Fi

H2Fi

H2Fi is a free, all-in-one SEO Audit Tool that helps you analyze your website’s complete performance. It audits GA4 data, Google Search Console insights, Google Business Profile visibility, and all major On-Page SEO factors to show you exactly what your site needs to improve.H2Fi scans your site for technical issues, on-page SEO, speed, mobile performance, indexing, and Core Web Vitals. Using GA4 and GSC insights, it highlights opportunities and gives clear recommendations to improve rankings — completely free.

Bundler

Bundler

It provides a consistent environment for Ruby projects by tracking and installing the exact gems and versions that are needed. It is an exit from dependency hell, and ensures that the gems you need are present in development, staging, and production.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana