Plastic SCM vs npm

Overview

npm

Stacks137.4K

Followers82.2K

Votes1.6K

GitHub Stars17.6K

Forks3.0K

Plastic SCM

Stacks40

Followers75

Votes17

Plastic SCM vs npm: What are the differences?

Version Control System vs Package Manager: Plastic SCM is a version control system used for managing and tracking changes in code repositories, while npm is a package manager primarily used for installing and managing dependencies in Node.js projects.
Visibility and Collaboration: Plastic SCM provides advanced features for branching, merging, and tracking changes, making it ideal for complex development workflows and collaboration among teams. On the other hand, npm lacks some of these features related to version control and team collaboration.
Dependency Management: npm is specifically designed for installing, updating, and removing dependencies in Node.js projects, streamlining the process for developers. Plastic SCM does not have built-in capabilities for managing dependencies like npm does.
Community and Support: npm has a larger and more active community of developers, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources. Plastic SCM, while also supported by a community, may not have the same level of resources and support available.
Integration with Node.js Ecosystem: Since npm is the default package manager for Node.js, it seamlessly integrates with the Node.js ecosystem, making it easier for developers to work on Node.js projects. Plastic SCM, while compatible with Node.js projects, may not have the same level of integration and convenience as npm.
Focus and Purpose: Plastic SCM is primarily focused on version control and managing code repositories, catering to the needs of software development teams. In contrast, npm is laser-focused on package management and simplifying the process of handling dependencies in Node.js projects.

In Summary, the key differences between Plastic SCM and npm lie in their core functionalities, collaboration features, dependency management capabilities, community support, integration with the Node.js ecosystem, and their primary focus and purpose.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on npm, Plastic SCM

StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

npm

Yarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k

Comments

Mark

CTO at Gemsotec bvba

Apr 25, 2019

Reviewon

React

TypeScript

Yarn

I use npm because I also mainly use React and TypeScript. Since several typings (from DefinitelyTyped) depend on the React typings, Yarn tends to mess up which leads to duplicate libraries present (different versions of the same type definition), which hinders the Typescript compiler. Npm always resolves to a single version per transitive dependency. At least that's my experience with both.

251k views251k

Comments

Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

npm	Plastic SCM
npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.	Plastic SCM is a distributed version control designed for big projects. It excels on branching and merging, graphical user interfaces, and can also deal with large files and even file-locking (great for game devs). It includes "semantic" features like refactor detection to ease diffing complex refactors.
-	Distributed version control system;Branch Explorer;Semantic Version Control;Locking;Huge files;Big projects;GitSync;Super strong merging;Partial replica;ACL security;Database backends
Statistics
GitHub Stars 17.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 137.4K	Stacks 40
Followers 82.2K	Followers 75
Votes 1.6K	Votes 17
Pros & Cons
Pros 648 Best package management system for javascript 382 Open-source 327 Great community 148 More packages than rubygems, pypi, or packagist 112 Nice people matter Cons 5 Bad at package versioning and being deterministic 5 Problems with lockfiles 3 Node-gyp takes forever 1 Super slow	Pros 8 Wanna do Branch per Task Dev? Plastic rocks it 4 No Size limite 2 Simple, easy to use interfaces. Resilient and solid 2 File Locking 1 Very fast Cons 1 Doesn't have file staging 1 No dark theme 1 Can't place windows next to each other to save space 1 Keyboard shortcuts are lacking 1 Adds files with only changed timestamp to pending
Integrations
No integrations available	Gluon TeamCity Jenkins Visual Studio Code Visual Studio

What are some alternatives to npm, Plastic SCM?

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

SVN (Subversion)

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source (AGPL 3) distributed version control system. Its distinctive feature is to be based on a sound theory of patches, which makes it easy to learn and use, and really distributed.

Verdaccio

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

Related Comparisons

Plastic SCM vs npm

Overview