StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Machine Learning Tools
  5. NLTK vs scikit-learn

NLTK vs scikit-learn

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

scikit-learn
scikit-learn
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.1K
Votes45
GitHub Stars63.9K
Forks26.4K
NLTK
NLTK
Stacks136
Followers179
Votes0

NLTK vs scikit-learn: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this section, we will discuss the key differences between NLTK and scikit-learn libraries for natural language processing (NLP).

  1. Data Representation: NLTK mainly focuses on processing the text data and provides various data structures and algorithms for NLP tasks. It offers specialized data structures like Text and FreqDist for text handling and provides tools for tokenization, stemming, part-of-speech tagging, and other language processing tasks. On the other hand, scikit-learn is a general machine learning library that provides a wide range of functionalities for various tasks, including NLP. It primarily uses numerical feature vectors to represent data, which can be a disadvantage while dealing with text data.

  2. NLP Algorithms: NLTK offers a rich collection of NLP algorithms and models for tasks like sentiment analysis, named entity recognition, chunking, and more. It provides easy-to-use interfaces and implementation of these algorithms, allowing users to quickly prototype and experiment with different approaches in NLP. On the flip side, scikit-learn focuses on machine learning algorithms for classification, regression, clustering, and other general tasks. It provides a limited set of NLP-specific algorithms, mainly for tasks like text classification and feature extraction.

  3. Preprocessing and Feature Extraction: NLTK emphasizes on providing a comprehensive range of text preprocessing techniques such as tokenization, stemming, normalization, stop-word removal, and feature extraction methods like bag-of-words and TF-IDF. It allows users to fine-tune the preprocessing steps according to their specific requirements. In contrast, scikit-learn also offers text preprocessing and feature extraction techniques but with limited options compared to NLTK. It provides basic preprocessing functions like tokenization and vectorization and lacks advanced techniques like stemming and lemmatization, which are available in NLTK.

  4. Integration with Other Libraries: NLTK seamlessly integrates with other libraries in the Python ecosystem, making it easy to combine its functionalities with tools like NumPy, pandas, and matplotlib for data analysis and visualization. It also provides integration with popular corpora and lexicons for various NLP tasks. On the contrary, scikit-learn is designed to work well with other machine learning libraries and tools. It tightly integrates with libraries like NumPy and SciPy for efficient numerical computing and with matplotlib for data visualization. However, it may require additional efforts to combine scikit-learn with specific NLP libraries or resources.

  5. Community and Documentation: NLTK has been around for a longer time and has a larger and more specialized community focused on NLP. It has extensive documentation and resources, including books and tutorials, providing guidance and examples for various NLP tasks. It is widely used in academia and research communities. In comparison, scikit-learn has a more generic community focused on machine learning in general. It also has good documentation and resources, but the coverage of NLP-related topics may not be as comprehensive as in NLTK.

  6. Development and Customization: NLTK allows users to easily extend its functionality and customize the existing modules for specific needs. It provides a flexible and modular architecture that supports easy development of new algorithms and models. Moreover, NLTK provides advanced features like corpus readers and parsers, making it suitable for building complex NLP systems. On the other hand, scikit-learn follows a more rigid and organized approach with a predefined set of models and algorithms. It focuses on providing optimized implementations of established machine learning techniques and may not offer the same level of customization and flexibility as NLTK.

In summary, NLTK is a specialized library exclusively for NLP tasks, offering a wide range of algorithms, tools, and resources. It provides extensive functionalities for text processing, feature extraction, and modeling. On the other hand, scikit-learn is a general-purpose machine learning library with limited NLP-specific functionalities but offers a broader range of machine learning algorithms for various tasks. The choice between NLTK and scikit-learn depends on the specific requirements and focus of the NLP project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

scikit-learn
scikit-learn
NLTK
NLTK

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

It is a suite of libraries and programs for symbolic and statistical natural language processing for English written in the Python programming language.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
63.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
26.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
136
Followers
1.1K
Followers
179
Votes
45
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Scientific computing
  • 19
    Easy
Cons
  • 2
    Limited
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to scikit-learn, NLTK?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

PyTorch

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

PredictionIO

PredictionIO

PredictionIO is an open source machine learning server for software developers to create predictive features, such as personalization, recommendation and content discovery.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope