Munin vs NetData

Overview

Munin

Stacks71

Followers95

Votes10

GitHub Stars2.1K

Forks479

Netdata

Stacks226

Followers392

Votes82

Munin vs NetData: What are the differences?

Data Collection and Storage: Munin collects data using plugins that run at regular intervals and stores the data in RRD files, while NetData operates as a standalone monitoring tool with an embedded web server collecting data using its own metrics collector.
Ease of Installation: Munin requires manual configuration of plugins and service installation, whereas NetData offers automatic detection of services and plugins, making the installation process more user-friendly and streamlined.
Real-time Monitoring: NetData provides real-time monitoring capabilities, displaying data with minimal delay, whereas Munin offers historical data analysis, providing insights into trends over time but with a slight delay due to its data collection intervals.
User Interface: NetData features a visually appealing, interactive dashboard with customizable options for data visualization, while Munin has a more traditional, straightforward interface design with limited customization options.
Community Support: NetData has a vibrant and active community with regular updates and a growing number of contributors, while Munin, although established and reliable, has a smaller user base and less frequent updates.
Resource Usage: NetData is known for its lightweight nature and low resource consumption, suitable for monitoring systems with limited resources, whereas Munin may require more resources due to its data storage method and data processing.

In Summary, Munin and NetData differ in terms of data collection and storage, ease of installation, real-time monitoring capabilities, user interface design, community support, and resource usage.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Munin	Netdata
Munin is a networked resource monitoring tool that can help analyze resource trends and "what just happened to kill our performance?" problems. It is designed to be very plug and play. A default installation provides a lot of graphs with almost no work.	Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps
-	Free, open-source; Easy installation and configuration; Access to monitoring unlimited metrics; Prebuilt dashboards and alarms; alerts on any metric, for a single host, an entire cluster, or your entire infrastructure; Tools for team collaboration; 800+ integrations
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 479	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 71	Stacks 226
Followers 95	Followers 392
Votes 10	Votes 82
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Good defaults 2 Extremely fast to install 2 Adheres to traditional Linux standards 2 Alerts can trigger any command line program 1 Easy to write custom plugins	Pros 17 Free 14 Easy setup 12 Graphs are interactive 9 Well maintained on github 9 Montiors datasbases
Integrations
No integrations available	Puppet Labs CouchDB ActiveMQ Logstash Fail2ban TimescaleDB Windows Grafana MongoDB RabbitMQ

What are some alternatives to Munin, Netdata?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

Munin vs NetData: What are the differences?

Data Collection and Storage: Munin collects data using plugins that run at regular intervals and stores the data in RRD files, while NetData operates as a standalone monitoring tool with an embedded web server collecting data using its own metrics collector.
Ease of Installation: Munin requires manual configuration of plugins and service installation, whereas NetData offers automatic detection of services and plugins, making the installation process more user-friendly and streamlined.
Real-time Monitoring: NetData provides real-time monitoring capabilities, displaying data with minimal delay, whereas Munin offers historical data analysis, providing insights into trends over time but with a slight delay due to its data collection intervals.
User Interface: NetData features a visually appealing, interactive dashboard with customizable options for data visualization, while Munin has a more traditional, straightforward interface design with limited customization options.
Community Support: NetData has a vibrant and active community with regular updates and a growing number of contributors, while Munin, although established and reliable, has a smaller user base and less frequent updates.
Resource Usage: NetData is known for its lightweight nature and low resource consumption, suitable for monitoring systems with limited resources, whereas Munin may require more resources due to its data storage method and data processing.

In Summary, Munin and NetData differ in terms of data collection and storage, ease of installation, real-time monitoring capabilities, user interface design, community support, and resource usage.

Munin vs NetData

Overview