StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Video Hosting
  4. Screen Sharing
  5. Microsoft Teams vs Quip vs Screenhero

Microsoft Teams vs Quip vs Screenhero

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Screenhero
Screenhero
Stacks61
Followers59
Votes16
Quip
Quip
Stacks98
Followers80
Votes14
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Stacks2.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes144

Microsoft Teams vs Quip vs Screenhero: What are the differences?

Write Introduction here
  1. Integration with Microsoft Office Suite: Microsoft Teams seamlessly integrates with other Microsoft Office applications such as Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, allowing for easy collaboration and file-sharing within the same ecosystem. Quip offers a unique collaboration platform with features geared towards team communication and document sharing, while Screenhero excels in real-time screen sharing capabilities.
  2. Communication Features: Microsoft Teams provides robust communication features, including video conferencing, chat, and file sharing, creating a centralized hub for team collaboration. Quip emphasizes its chat functionality and document collaboration tools, enabling teams to work together on projects in real time. Screenhero focuses on screen sharing and collaborative editing, making it ideal for remote team collaboration.
  3. Customization and Extensibility: Microsoft Teams offers a wide range of customization options, including the ability to integrate third-party apps and services, making it highly adaptable to different team needs. Quip focuses on providing a user-friendly interface and customizable templates for document creation, while Screenhero's primary focus is on enhancing screen sharing and collaboration capabilities.
  4. Platform Support: Microsoft Teams is available on various platforms, including web browsers, desktop applications, and mobile devices, ensuring accessibility for users across different devices. Quip also supports multiple platforms, with the emphasis on seamless collaboration across different devices, while Screenhero primarily focuses on desktop applications for screen sharing and collaboration.
  5. Security and Compliance: Microsoft Teams offers comprehensive security features, compliance certifications, and data encryption, ensuring data protection and regulatory compliance for users. Quip prioritizes data security and privacy, implementing encryption and access control measures to safeguard user information, while Screenhero focuses on providing secure screen sharing capabilities for remote collaboration.
  6. Team Collaboration Workflow: Microsoft Teams streamlines team collaboration workflows through features like task management, calendar integration, and project planning tools, enhancing productivity and communication within teams. Quip enhances collaboration through shared documents, chat threads, and real-time editing capabilities, while Screenhero's focus on screen sharing enhances visual communication and remote collaboration within teams.

In Summary, the key differences between Microsoft Teams, Quip, and Screenhero lie in their integration with Microsoft Office Suite, communication features, customization and extensibility, platform support, security and compliance measures, and team collaboration workflow enhancements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Screenhero, Quip, Microsoft Teams

Mohammad Hossein
Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planallay Sdn Bhd

Jan 17, 2020

Decided

we were using slack and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.

on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.

we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.

266k views266k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Screenhero
Screenhero
Quip
Quip
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams

Screenhero gives you low-lag screen sharing, multiple mouse cursors, and voice chat. You each get your own mouse cursor, and you're both always in control. It works with your favorite IDE, text editor, or app.

Edit and discuss in one place. Quip combines documents with messages so you can work faster, on the web or on the go.

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Multiple mouse cursors;HD quality;Voice chat;Cross platform
Multi-platform;Collaborative editing;Integrated messaging;Diffs;Offline support;Shared folders@mentions;Presence;Read receipts;Interactive checklists;Chat tabs;
All your content, tools, people, and conversations are available in the team workspace;Enjoy built-in access to SharePoint, OneNote, and Skype for Business;Work on documents right in the app
Statistics
Stacks
61
Stacks
98
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
59
Followers
80
Followers
1.7K
Votes
16
Votes
14
Votes
144
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Remote pair programming for web development
  • 2
    Both people can control. Mic Drop.
  • 2
    Great Mac app
  • 1
    Crystal clear audio quality
  • 1
    Controlling presenter's screen is the default behavior
Pros
  • 6
    Simple, reliable and fast
  • 5
    Enterprise worthy gdocs
  • 2
    Has no competitors for team documentation
  • 1
    Great UI and easy to find docs in colourful files
Pros
  • 29
    Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow
  • 24
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 12
    Great integrations
  • 12
    Well-thought Design
Cons
  • 17
    Confusing UI
  • 12
    Bad performance on init and after quite a use
  • 10
    Bad Usermanagement
  • 6
    No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)
  • 6
    Can't see all members in a video meeting
Integrations
HipChat
HipChat
Slack
Slack
No integrations available
Skype
Skype

What are some alternatives to Screenhero, Quip, Microsoft Teams?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

appear.in

appear.in

Create a video room. Share the link. Appear together. Built with WebRTC & AngularJS.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack