Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn MorePros of Microbundle
Pros of Webpack
Pros of Webpacker
Pros of Microbundle
- All the best Terser and Rollup settings already set1
- Works well with TypeScript1
Pros of Webpack
- Most powerful bundler308
- Built-in dev server with livereload181
- Can handle all types of assets142
- Easy configuration87
- Laravel-mix22
- Overengineered, Underdeveloped4
- Makes it easy to bundle static assets2
- Webpack-Encore2
- Redundant1
- Better support in Browser Dev-Tools1
Pros of Webpacker
Be the first to leave a pro
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Microbundle
Cons of Webpack
Cons of Webpacker
Cons of Microbundle
Be the first to leave a con
Cons of Webpack
- Hard to configure15
- No clear direction5
- Spaghetti-Code out of the box2
- SystemJS integration is quite lackluster2
- Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)2
- Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers2
Cons of Webpacker
Be the first to leave a con
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Microbundle?
Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.
What is Webpack?
A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
What is Webpacker?
Webpacker makes it easy to use the JavaScript preprocessor and bundler Webpack to manage application-like JavaScript in Rails. It coexists with the asset pipeline, as the purpose is only to use Webpack for app-like JavaScript, not images, css, or even JavaScript Sprinkles (that all continues to live in app/assets).
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jobs that mention Microbundle, Webpack, and Webpacker as a desired skillset
What companies use Microbundle?
What companies use Webpack?
What companies use Webpacker?
What companies use Microbundle?
No companies found
What companies use Webpacker?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Microbundle?
What tools integrate with Webpack?
What tools integrate with Webpacker?
What tools integrate with Microbundle?
What tools integrate with Webpack?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+31 27
35922
+46 27
32375
+39 21
30939
+43 18
5097
+42 53
21083
+27 13
5499
What are some alternatives to Microbundle, Webpack, and Webpacker?
rollup
It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.
Parcel
Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.
gulp
Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.
Grunt
The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.
Vite
It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.