Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Microbundle

18
36
+ 1
2
rollup

1.7K
161
+ 1
17
Add tool

Microbundle vs rollup: What are the differences?

Introduction

Microbundle and Rollup are two popular tools used for bundling and packaging JavaScript modules. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between them that make each one suitable for specific use cases. In this comparison, we will highlight six main differences between Microbundle and Rollup.

  1. Configuration simplicity: Microbundle aims to simplify the configuration process by providing sensible defaults. It requires minimal configuration and can build a bundle with just a few lines of code. On the other hand, Rollup offers more flexibility and control over the bundling process by allowing detailed configuration. It requires a more in-depth configuration setup but provides more customization options.

  2. Built-in optimizations: Microbundle includes various built-in optimizations such as tree-shaking, dead code elimination, and minification by default. These optimizations help to reduce the bundle size and improve performance without the need for additional configuration. Rollup, on the other hand, provides flexibility to explicitly configure and enable optimizations based on specific requirements.

  3. Module formats support: Microbundle primarily focuses on providing CommonJS and ES modules as output formats, which are compatible with most modern JavaScript environments. Rollup, in contrast, supports a wide range of output formats, including CommonJS, ES modules, UMD, AMD, and SystemJS. This flexibility makes Rollup a better choice when targeting different module systems.

  4. Plugins and ecosystem: Rollup has a larger and more mature ecosystem of plugins compared to Microbundle. This wide range of plugins allows for seamless integration with various build tools, optimizing images, transpiling code, and many other functionalities. Microbundle, although it has a growing number of plugins, doesn't have the same level of plugin support as Rollup.

  5. Development experience: Microbundle provides a fast and easy development experience out of the box. It offers fast rebuild times, automatic reloading, and supports incremental builds, making it ideal for rapid prototyping and development workflows. Rollup, while still offering decent build performance, may require additional setup for features like live reloading and incremental builds.

  6. Community and popularity: Rollup has gained more popularity and has a larger community compared to Microbundle. This means that Rollup has more active development, updates, and community support. It also makes it easier to find help, tutorials, and resources related to Rollup.

In summary, Microbundle is a lightweight and easy-to-use bundler with built-in optimizations and simplicity, ideal for small to medium-sized projects. On the other hand, Rollup offers more customization options, module format support, a larger ecosystem of plugins, and is well-suited for larger projects with complex bundling requirements.

Decisions about Microbundle and rollup

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Microbundle
Pros of rollup
  • 1
    All the best Terser and Rollup settings already set
  • 1
    Works well with TypeScript
  • 4
    Makes it easy to publish packages
  • 3
    Easier configuration
  • 2
    Better tree shaking
  • 2
    Provides smaller bundle size
  • 1
    Integrates seamlessly with SystemJS
  • 1
    Produces very clean code
  • 1
    Very reliable
  • 1
    Very robust Plugin-API (years old Plugins still work)
  • 1
    Very flexible
  • 1
    Was built with ESM-Modules in mind

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Microbundle
Cons of rollup
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      No clear path for static assets
    • 1
      No Loader like Webpack (need to use sjs or ESM imports)
    • 1
      Almost everything needs to be a Plugin
    • 1
      Manual Chunking is a bit buggy

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Microbundle?

    Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

    What is rollup?

    It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Microbundle?
    What companies use rollup?
      No companies found
      See which teams inside your own company are using Microbundle or rollup.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Microbundle?
      What tools integrate with rollup?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to Microbundle and rollup?
      Webpack
      A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
      Parcel
      Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.
      gulp
      Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.
      Grunt
      The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.
      Vite
      It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.
      See all alternatives