Microbundle vs Parcel vs Webpack

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Microbundle

18
36
+ 1
2
Parcel

775
250
+ 1
18
Webpack

39.9K
27K
+ 1
752
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Microbundle
Pros of Parcel
Pros of Webpack
  • 1
    All the best Terser and Rollup settings already set
  • 1
    Works well with TypeScript
  • 10
    Zero configuration
  • 8
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
  • 4
    Overengineered, Underdeveloped
  • 2
    Makes it easy to bundle static assets
  • 2
    Webpack-Encore
  • 1
    Redundant
  • 1
    Better support in Browser Dev-Tools

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Microbundle
Cons of Parcel
Cons of Webpack
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 3
      Lack of documentation
    • 15
      Hard to configure
    • 5
      No clear direction
    • 2
      Spaghetti-Code out of the box
    • 2
      SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
    • 2
      Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
    • 2
      Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Microbundle?

    Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

    What is Parcel?

    Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

    What is Webpack?

    A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Microbundle?
    What companies use Parcel?
    What companies use Webpack?
      No companies found

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Microbundle?
      What tools integrate with Parcel?
      What tools integrate with Webpack?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Microbundle, Parcel, and Webpack?
      rollup
      It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.
      gulp
      Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.
      Grunt
      The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.
      Vite
      It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.
      Esbuild
      It is an extremely fast JavaScript and CSS bundler and minifier. Current build tools for the web are 10-100x slower than they could be. The main goal of this project is to bring about a new era of build tool performance, and create an easy-to-use modern bundler along the way.
      See all alternatives