Meteor vs React Navigation

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Meteor

1.9K
1.8K
+ 1
1.7K
React Navigation

1.3K
341
+ 1
1
Add tool

Meteor vs React Navigation: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Meteor and React Navigation, there are distinctive differences that set them apart in terms of functionality and usage in web development projects.

  1. Architecture: Meteor is a full-stack platform that combines front-end and back-end development in a single framework, providing a comprehensive solution for building web applications. On the other hand, React Navigation is primarily focused on handling navigation within React Native applications, offering a seamless way to manage navigational components.

  2. Community Support: Meteor has a strong and active community that contributes to the platform with various packages, extensions, and resources to support developers. React Navigation, being a part of the React Native ecosystem, relies on the vibrant React community for updates, fixes, and enhancements.

  3. Real-time Data: One of the key features of Meteor is its built-in support for real-time data synchronization, allowing for instant updates across connected clients without the need for additional configurations. React Navigation, being a navigation library, does not have the inherent capability for real-time data synchronization.

  4. Technology Stack: Meteor comes with its own JavaScript stack that includes MongoDB, Blaze, and Tracker, providing a seamless development environment with pre-integrated tools. React Navigation, on the other hand, integrates with React Native and relies on the components and libraries available within the React Native ecosystem.

  5. Scalability: Meteor is known for its scalability and ability to handle large-scale applications with ease, thanks to its efficient data synchronization mechanisms and seamless client-server communication. React Navigation, being a navigation library, focuses more on providing smooth and responsive navigation experiences within React Native applications rather than scalability concerns.

  6. Customization: Meteor offers a high degree of customization through packages, extensions, and a flexible architecture that allows developers to tailor their applications according to specific requirements. In contrast, React Navigation provides a set of predefined navigation components and patterns that can be customized to some extent but with limitations compared to the extensive customization options available in Meteor.

In Summary, when comparing Meteor and React Navigation, the key differences lie in their architecture, community support, real-time data capabilities, technology stack, scalability, and customization options, each catering to different aspects of web development projects.

Decisions about Meteor and React Navigation
Lucas Litton
Founder & CEO at Macombey · | 13 upvotes · 540.1K views

Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.

See more

This basically came down to two things: performance on compute-heavy tasks and a need for good tooling. We used to have a Meteor based Node.js application which worked great for RAD and getting a working prototype in a short time, but we felt pains trying to scale it, especially when doing anything involving crunching data, which Node sucks at. We also had bad experience with tooling support for doing large scale refactorings in Javascript compared to the best-in-class tools available for Java (IntelliJ). Given the heavy domain and very involved logic we wanted good tooling support to be able to do great refactorings that are just not possible in Javascript. Java is an old warhorse, but it performs fantastically and we have not regretted going down this route, avoiding "enterprise" smells and going as lightweight as we can, using Jdbi instead of Persistence API, a homegrown Actor Model library for massive concurrency, etc ...

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Meteor
Pros of React Navigation
  • 252
    Real-time
  • 200
    Full stack, one language
  • 183
    Best app dev platform available today
  • 155
    Data synchronization
  • 152
    Javascript
  • 118
    Focus on your product not the plumbing
  • 107
    Hot code pushes
  • 106
    Open source
  • 102
    Live page updates
  • 92
    Latency compensation
  • 39
    Ultra-simple development environment
  • 29
    Real time awesome
  • 29
    Smart Packages
  • 23
    Great for beginners
  • 22
    Direct Cordova integration
  • 16
    Better than Rails
  • 15
    Less moving parts
  • 13
    It's just amazing
  • 10
    Blaze
  • 8
    Great community support
  • 8
    Plugins for everything
  • 6
    One command spits out android and ios ready apps.
  • 5
    It just works
  • 5
    0 to Production in no time
  • 4
    Coding Speed
  • 4
    Easy deployment
  • 4
    Is Agile in development hybrid(mobile/web)
  • 4
    You can grok it in a day. No ng nonsense
  • 2
    Easy yet powerful
  • 2
    AngularJS Integration
  • 2
    One Code => 3 Platforms: Web, Android and IOS
  • 2
    Community
  • 1
    Easy Setup
  • 1
    Free
  • 1
    Nosql
  • 1
    Hookie friendly
  • 1
    High quality, very few bugs
  • 1
    Stack available on Codeanywhere
  • 1
    Real time
  • 1
    Friendly to use
  • 1
    Easy to use

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Meteor
Cons of React Navigation
  • 5
    Does not scale well
  • 4
    Hard to debug issues on the server-side
  • 4
    Heavily CPU bound
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Meteor?

    A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

    What is React Navigation?

    Start quickly with built-in navigators that deliver a seamless out-of-the box experience. Navigation views that deliver 60fps animations, and utilize native components to deliver a great look and feel.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Meteor?
    What companies use React Navigation?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Meteor or React Navigation.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Meteor?
    What tools integrate with React Navigation?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Meteor and React Navigation?
    React
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    Angular
    It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.
    NuGet
    A free and open-source package manager designed for the Microsoft development platform. It is also distributed as a Visual Studio extension.
    RubyGems
    It is a package manager for the Ruby programming language that provides a standard format for distributing Ruby programs and libraries, a tool designed to easily manage the installation of gems, and a server for distributing them.
    Bower
    Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.
    See all alternatives