Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Mailjet vs Mandrill: What are the differences?
- Pricing Model: Mailjet follows a credit-based system where users are charged based on the number of emails sent, while Mandrill operates on a pay-per-use model, where users are charged per email sent. This difference in pricing models can significantly impact the overall cost for users depending on their email volume.
- Feature Set: Mailjet offers a comprehensive set of features including A/B testing, segmentation, and marketing automation tools. In contrast, Mandrill focuses primarily on transactional email delivery and lacks some advanced marketing features. Depending on the specific needs of a user, choosing between the two platforms should consider the availability of required features.
- API Integration: Mandrill is tightly integrated with the MailChimp platform, allowing for seamless options for users already using MailChimp for other marketing purposes. On the other hand, Mailjet offers integration with various third-party applications and platforms, providing users with more flexibility in connecting their email marketing with other tools.
- Deliverability Rate: Mailjet boasts a high deliverability rate, ensuring that emails reach the intended recipients' inboxes effectively. Mandrill, while still offering good deliverability rates, might face some deliverability challenges due to its association with shared IP addresses.
- Support Options: Mailjet provides 24/7 customer support across various channels including email, phone, and live chat for all users. In comparison, Mandrill offers support mainly through email and online documentation, with additional support options available only for premium users. This difference in support availability can be critical for users requiring immediate assistance.
- Sender Authentication: Mailjet provides the option for users to customize sender authentication settings to enhance email security and deliverability, such as DKIM and SPF records. In contrast, Mandrill does not offer as much flexibility in terms of customizing sender authentication settings, potentially impacting email deliverability and security for users.
In Summary, Mailjet and Mandrill differ in pricing models, feature sets, API integration, deliverability rates, support options, and sender authentication capabilities.
For transactional emails, notifications, reminders, etc, I want to make it so writers/designers can set up the emails and maintain them, and then dynamically insert fields, that I then replace when actually sending the mail from code.
I think the ability to use a basic layout template across individual email templates would make things a lot easier (think header, footer, standard typography, etc).
What is best for this? Why would you prefer Mailgun, SendGrid, Mandrill or something else?
The only transactional email service that I've been able to stomach is Postmark! It is by far the easiest (and quickest to get feedback from) service that I have come across. While drowning in attempts to debug Mandril, Mailgun and others I get quick feedback from Postmark in what I need to do.
Postmark for the win!
If you need your emails to be sent in a time-sensitive manner, I'd recommend SendGrid. We were using Mailgun and the lag because they aren't "transactional" in nature caused issues for us. SendGrid also has the ability to do dynamic templates and bulk send from their API. I don't know that they have the shared layout ability you mentioned, though.
We are using more extensively Mandrill.
It is a ok tool, which gives you the power for emailing with nice set of features.
The templates editing and management is a bit tricky, but this is mostly related to email templates in general, which are hard to create and maintain.
I do not think you can share the parts of the templates. You can have your predefined templates with possibility to insert dynamic content.
They provide a limited possibility to preview and test your templates.
The template editor is text only. For the better editors checkout http://topol.io or https://mosaico.io
Unfortunately, I do not have experience with the other tools and possibilities to manage templates.
At this stage, all of the tools you mentioned do email delivery pretty well. They all support email templates as well. Here are some considerations:
- Twilio owns SendGrid. If you're an existing Twilio customer, in my opinion that's a good reason to use SendGrid over the other solutions. The APIs are solid, and Twilio has excellent developer tools that allow you to create interesting automations (which is important for scaling).
- Mandrill was created by MailChimp, who have massive experience with email delivery and specifically with emailing beautiful email templates.
- Mailgun is a tool on its own. Like the other two, it supports mail templates and is built to be controlled almost exclusively via APIs.
SendGrid and Mandrill have pretty nice WYSIWIG template editors as part of their platform. Not so sure about Mailgun.
So for me the considerations would be: 1. How easy is it for you to integrate with their API? How complete is their API in terms of your own specific needs? 2. Prices: Which one works best for my budget? 3. Am I OK with editing the templates elsewhere (or even by hand), and then pasting the code into Mailgun? Or do I want the comfort of Mandrill or Sendgrid with their WYSIWYG editors?
Personally I'd go with Twilio, simply because it's such a massive ecosystem they are less likely to go bankrupt, and their APIs are rock solid.
We did a quick test on the reliability of these three common email services, sending a few emails an hour at random intervals.
Unfortunately, none of them had 100% availability over the 30 day test. I don't understand why this is so hard?
Mailgun performed the best with the most reliability and fastest response times. Mandrill was notably bad.
Pros of Mailjet
- Simple7
- Cheap6
- Reliable2
- Setup1
- Integrates with Zapier1
- outsourcing1
Pros of Mandrill
- Simple installation189
- Great api141
- Generous free allowance to get you started123
- Cheap and simple114
- Trackable99
- Well-documented59
- Doesn't go to spam54
- Great for mailchimp users47
- Webhooks32
- Client libraries28
- Heroku Add-on7
- Easy to use6
- Meaningful Metrics5
- Free5
- Advanced Tagging and Reports3
- Mobile Access3
- Status Update3
- Very chimp-like2
- Great Documentation2
- love this service2
- Free Plan1
- Webhooks for bounce mail1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Mailjet
- Support does not respond1
- Support is a joke1
Cons of Mandrill
- Really hard to pull analytics out via api1