StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Open Source Cloud
  5. LXD vs OpenStack

LXD vs OpenStack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenStack
OpenStack
Stacks790
Followers1.2K
Votes138
LXD
LXD
Stacks104
Followers194
Votes68

LXD vs OpenStack: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of cloud computing, two popular technologies, LXD and OpenStack, provide powerful solutions for software development and infrastructure management. Understanding the key differences between LXD and OpenStack is crucial for determining the most suitable platform for particular use cases.

  1. Architecture: LXD focuses on system containerization, allowing for lightweight virtualization with containers that share the same kernel as the host system. In contrast, OpenStack is a cloud operating system that provides Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) by managing pools of resources across a datacenter.

  2. Scope: While LXD primarily focuses on system containers and offers a streamlined approach for container management, OpenStack provides a comprehensive platform for managing virtual machines, containers, and various storage and networking resources.

  3. Management Complexity: LXD is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it an ideal choice for developers and small-to-medium businesses looking to quickly deploy and manage containers. On the other hand, OpenStack is a complex system that requires considerable expertise and resources to deploy and maintain, making it more suitable for enterprise-grade deployments.

  4. Scalability: OpenStack offers scalability by allowing users to deploy and manage large-scale cloud environments with distributed resources. In contrast, LXD is more suitable for smaller-scale deployments due to its focus on system containers.

  5. Community Support: OpenStack has a large and active community that contributes to its development, provides support, and offers a wide range of plugins and extensions. While LXD also has a growing community, it may not be as extensive as the OpenStack community in terms of support and resources.

  6. Use Cases: LXD is commonly used for lightweight containerization of applications, development environments, and software testing. OpenStack, on the other hand, is preferred for building private and public clouds, managing virtual machines, and providing a robust infrastructure for enterprise workloads.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between LXD and OpenStack in terms of architecture, scope, management complexity, scalability, community support, and use cases is essential for choosing the most suitable platform for specific cloud computing requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on OpenStack, LXD

Florian
Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

OpenStack
OpenStack
LXD
LXD

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Compute;Storage;Networking;Dashboard;Shared Services
-
Statistics
Stacks
790
Stacks
104
Followers
1.2K
Followers
194
Votes
138
Votes
68
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Private cloud
  • 39
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 23
    Flexible in use
  • 7
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Robust architecture
Pros
  • 10
    More simple
  • 8
    Best
  • 8
    API
  • 8
    Open Source
  • 7
    Cluster
Integrations
No integrations available
LXC
LXC

What are some alternatives to OpenStack, LXD?

Docker

Docker

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Apache CloudStack

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

LXC

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

rkt

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

VirtKick

VirtKick

Software as a service platform for hosting providers.

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud pairs with Vagrant to enable access, insight and collaboration across teams, as well as to bring exposure to community contributions and development environments.

Studio 3T

Studio 3T

It's the only MongoDB tool that provides three ways to explore data alongside powerful features like query autocompletion, polyglot code generation, a stage-by-stage aggregation query builder, import and export, SQL query support and more.

OpenNebula

OpenNebula

It provides a simple but feature-rich and flexible solution for the comprehensive management of virtualized data centers to enable on-premise enterprise clouds in existing infrastructures. It can be primarily used as a virtualization tool to manage your virtual infrastructure in the data-center or cluster, which is usually referred as Private Cloud. It supports Hybrid Cloud to combine local infrastructure with public cloud-based infrastructure, enabling highly scalable hosting environments.

Eucalyptus

Eucalyptus

Eucalyptus is open source software for building private, AWS-compatible IT, QA, and developer clouds. It makes it easy to deliver cloud computing, just like AWS, from within your data center.

OpenVZ

OpenVZ

Virtuozzo leverages OpenVZ as its core of a virtualization solution offered by Virtuozzo company. Virtuozzo is optimized for hosters and offers hypervisor (VMs in addition to containers), distributed cloud storage, dedicated support, management tools, and easy installation.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana