StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. LibreNMS vs Zabbix

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zabbix
Zabbix
Stacks684
Followers981
Votes66
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.1K
LibreNMS
LibreNMS
Stacks55
Followers186
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.4K
Forks2.5K

LibreNMS vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

LibreNMS and Zabbix are two popular network monitoring and management systems that provide features for monitoring hosts, servers, devices, and services on a network. Here are the key differences between the two.

  1. Ease of Setup and Configuration: LibreNMS offers a more straightforward installation process with a user-friendly web interface, making it easier for users to set up and configure the system. On the other hand, Zabbix requires more technical expertise and knowledge to install and configure, and its web interface can be overwhelming for beginners.

  2. Flexibility and Customization: Zabbix provides more extensive customization options and flexibility in terms of creating customized monitoring templates, triggers, and actions. This allows users to tailor the monitoring system to their specific needs and requirements. LibreNMS, although not as flexible as Zabbix, still offers a decent level of customization options.

  3. Scalability: Zabbix is known for its scalability, making it suitable for large and complex environments with thousands of devices and hosts. It can handle a high volume of data and supports distributed monitoring setups. On the other hand, LibreNMS may struggle in larger environments, and its performance could be affected when dealing with a significant number of devices and hosts.

  4. Integration and Extensibility: Zabbix provides a wide range of integrations and APIs, allowing users to integrate it with other systems and extend its functionalities. It supports various third-party plugins and offers a RESTful API for easy integration. Although LibreNMS also supports integration with other systems, its list of integrations and APIs is not as extensive as Zabbix.

  5. User Interface and Visualization: Zabbix offers a more comprehensive and visually appealing user interface with advanced graphing and visualization capabilities. It provides intuitive dashboards and real-time monitoring screens, making it easier for users to interpret and analyze data. In comparison, LibreNMS has a simpler and less visually appealing interface, although still functional for day-to-day monitoring tasks.

  6. Community and Support: LibreNMS has a strong and active community of users and developers, providing excellent support through forums, documentation, and community-driven development. Zabbix also has a vibrant community but is more enterprise-focused, offering commercial support options alongside its community support.

In summary, LibreNMS offers easier setup and configuration, while Zabbix provides more flexibility, scalability, and customization options. Zabbix also has a more advanced user interface and better support for large-scale environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Zabbix, LibreNMS

vivek
vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceonCentreonCentreonZabbixZabbixDatadogDatadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix
Zabbix
LibreNMS
LibreNMS

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.

Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation
Monitoring; Alerting; Distributed monitoring; Open-source; Automatic discovery; API; Billing system; Automatic updates
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Stars
4.4K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
684
Stacks
55
Followers
981
Followers
186
Votes
66
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Free
  • 9
    Alerts
  • 5
    Service/node/network discovery
  • 5
    Templates
  • 4
    Base metrics from the box
Cons
  • 5
    The UI is in PHP
  • 2
    Puppet module is sluggish
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack
Slack
Jira
Jira
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Grafana
Grafana
Ansible
Ansible
Skype
Skype
Chef
Chef
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
HipChat
HipChat
ServiceNow.com
ServiceNow.com
Datadog
Datadog
Kong
Kong
EasyEngine
EasyEngine
Plesk
Plesk
Server Density
Server Density
OpenResty
OpenResty
OpsDash
OpsDash
Scalyr
Scalyr

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, LibreNMS?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana