Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Kubeflow vs MLflow: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of Machine Learning operations, two popular tools are Kubeflow and MLflow, each offering unique features and capabilities for managing and scaling machine learning workflows.

  1. Architecture: Kubeflow is an open-source platform designed specifically for Kubernetes environments, providing a complete machine learning stack, including tools for training, serving, and monitoring models. On the other hand, MLflow is a framework-agnostic tool that can be used with any machine learning library, allowing users to track experiments, package code, and manage models across different frameworks.

  2. Workflow Management: Kubeflow focuses on end-to-end machine learning workflows, enabling users to seamlessly move from data preparation and experimentation to model deployment and monitoring. In contrast, MLflow is more oriented towards experiment tracking and model management, providing a centralized repository for storing models, code, and metadata.

  3. Deployment Flexibility: Kubeflow leverages Kubernetes for deploying machine learning models in containerized environments, offering scalability and portability across different infrastructure providers. MLflow, on the other hand, supports various deployment options, including Docker containers, cloud platforms, and standalone servers, making it versatile for different deployment scenarios.

  4. Model Serving: Kubeflow provides a built-in model serving component called TensorFlow Serving for serving machine learning models in production environments. Meanwhile, MLflow offers integration with popular serving frameworks like TensorFlow Serving, SageMaker, and Azure ML, allowing users to deploy models in a variety of deployment targets.

  5. Experiment Tracking: MLflow excels in experiment tracking functionality, allowing users to log parameters, metrics, and artifacts for each run, facilitating reproducibility and collaboration. While Kubeflow also provides tracking capabilities, MLflow's user-friendly interface and API make it the go-to choice for experiment management and version control.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Kubeflow benefits from a thriving open-source community and extensive ecosystem of tools and libraries specifically tailored for Kubernetes-based machine learning workflows. On the other hand, MLflow has gained popularity due to its framework-agnostic approach, attracting users from various machine learning backgrounds and enabling seamless integration with popular libraries like TensorFlow, PyTorch, and scikit-learn.

In Summary, Kubeflow and MLflow offer distinct advantages in managing and scaling machine learning workflows, with Kubeflow focusing on Kubernetes-based architecture and end-to-end workflow management, while MLflow excels in experiment tracking, model management, and deployment flexibility across different frameworks and environments.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Kubeflow
Pros of MLflow
  • 9
    System designer
  • 3
    Google backed
  • 3
  • 3
    Kfp dsl
  • 0
  • 5
    Code First
  • 4
    Simplified Logging

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Kubeflow?

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

What is MLflow?

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Kubeflow?
What companies use MLflow?
See which teams inside your own company are using Kubeflow or MLflow.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Kubeflow?
What tools integrate with MLflow?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Kubeflow and MLflow?
TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.
Apache Spark
Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.
Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.
An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.
Argo is an open source container-native workflow engine for getting work done on Kubernetes. Argo is implemented as a Kubernetes CRD (Custom Resource Definition).
See all alternatives