Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kibana vs Metabase: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Kibana and Metabase
Kibana and Metabase are two popular data visualization tools used for analyzing and interpreting data. Despite some similarities, there are distinct differences between the two. Here are the key differences:
Data Sources: Kibana primarily works with Elasticsearch, a search and analytics engine, while Metabase supports multiple databases and data sources. Kibana is more focused on real-time data analysis and visualization in conjunction with Elasticsearch, whereas Metabase allows for connecting with various databases like MySQL, PostgreSQL, and others.
Complexity: Kibana is more complex and provides advanced features for experienced users. It requires technical knowledge and expertise to set up and configure. On the other hand, Metabase is designed to be user-friendly and accessible to non-technical users. It emphasizes simplicity and ease of use without sacrificing functionality.
Visualization Options: Kibana offers a wide range of visualization options, including bar charts, line charts, pie charts, maps, and more. It provides a vast array of customization features to create interactive and dynamic visualizations. Metabase, although it offers different visualization types, has a comparatively smaller set of options compared to Kibana. However, it still covers most common visualization needs.
Dashboarding Features: Kibana provides powerful dashboarding capabilities, allowing users to create and share interactive dashboards with real-time data. It offers extensive filtering, drill-down options, and panel customization. Metabase also supports dashboarding but has fewer advanced features compared to Kibana. Its focus is more on simplicity and straightforward dashboard creation.
Community and Ecosystem: Kibana benefits from a large and active open-source community due to its connection with the Elastic Stack. It has extensive documentation, plugins, and support resources available. Metabase, while it also has an active community, may not have as many resources and plugins compared to Kibana. The ecosystem around Kibana is generally more mature and widely adopted.
Price: Kibana is open-source and free to use, but some additional features may require a subscription to the Elastic Stack. Metabase, likewise, is open-source and free to download, use, and modify without any limitations or pricing tiers. Both tools offer enterprise versions or support options, but the basic functionality is available without any costs.
In summary, Kibana is a more technically advanced and feature-rich tool primarily intended for real-time data analysis using Elasticsearch. Metabase, on the other hand, is a user-friendly and accessible tool that supports multiple databases and emphasizes simplicity without sacrificing functionality. The choice would depend on the specific needs of the user, the complexity of the data, and the technical expertise available.
From a StackShare Community member: “We need better analytics & insights into our Elasticsearch cluster. Grafana, which ships with advanced support for Elasticsearch, looks great but isn’t officially supported/endorsed by Elastic. Kibana, on the other hand, is made and supported by Elastic. I’m wondering what people suggest in this situation."
For our Predictive Analytics platform, we have used both Grafana and Kibana
- Grafana based demo video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdTB2AcU4Sg
- Kibana based reporting screenshot: https://imgur.com/vuVvZKN
Kibana has predictions
and ML algorithms support, so if you need them, you may be better off with Kibana . The multi-variate analysis features it provide are very unique (not available in Grafana).
For everything else, definitely Grafana . Especially the number of supported data sources, and plugins clearly makes Grafana a winner (in just visualization and reporting sense). Creating your own plugin is also very easy. The top pros of Grafana (which it does better than Kibana ) are:
- Creating and organizing visualization panels
- Templating the panels on dashboards for repetetive tasks
- Realtime monitoring, filtering of charts based on conditions and variables
- Export / Import in JSON format (that allows you to version and save your dashboard as part of git)
I use both Kibana and Grafana on my workplace: Kibana for logging and Grafana for monitoring. Since you already work with Elasticsearch, I think Kibana is the safest choice in terms of ease of use and variety of messages it can manage, while Grafana has still (in my opinion) a strong link to metrics
After looking for a way to monitor or at least get a better overview of our infrastructure, we found out that Grafana (which I previously only used in ELK stacks) has a plugin available to fully integrate with Amazon CloudWatch . Which makes it way better for our use-case than the offer of the different competitors (most of them are even paid). There is also a CloudFlare plugin available, the platform we use to serve our DNS requests. Although we are a big fan of https://smashing.github.io/ (previously dashing), for now we are starting with Grafana .
I use Kibana because it ships with the ELK stack. I don't find it as powerful as Splunk however it is light years above grepping through log files. We previously used Grafana but found it to be annoying to maintain a separate tool outside of the ELK stack. We were able to get everything we needed from Kibana.
Kibana should be sufficient in this architecture for decent analytics, if stronger metrics is needed then combine with Grafana. Datadog also offers nice overview but there's no need for it in this case unless you need more monitoring and alerting (and more technicalities).
@Kibana, of course, because @Grafana looks like amateur sort of solution, crammed with query builder grouping aggregates, but in essence, as recommended by CERN - KIbana is the corporate (startup vectored) decision.
Furthermore, @Kibana comes with complexity adhering ELK stack, whereas @InfluxDB + @Grafana & co. recently have become sophisticated development conglomerate instead of advancing towards a understandable installation step by step inheritance.
Pros of Kibana
- Easy to setup88
- Free65
- Can search text45
- Has pie chart21
- X-axis is not restricted to timestamp13
- Easy queries and is a good way to view logs9
- Supports Plugins6
- Dev Tools4
- More "user-friendly"3
- Can build dashboards3
- Out-of-Box Dashboards/Analytics for Metrics/Heartbeat2
- Easy to drill-down2
- Up and running1
Pros of Metabase
- Database visualisation62
- Open Source45
- Easy setup41
- Dashboard out of the box36
- Free23
- Simple14
- Support for many dbs9
- Easy embedding7
- Easy6
- It's good6
- AGPL : wont help with adoption but depends on your goal5
- BI doesn't get easier than that5
- Google analytics integration4
- Multiple integrations4
- Easy set up4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Kibana
- Unintuituve7
- Works on top of elastic only4
- Elasticsearch is huge4
- Hardweight UI3
Cons of Metabase
- Harder to setup than similar tools7