Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jest

9.7K
4K
+ 1
175
SuperTest

931
102
+ 1
0
Add tool

Jest vs SuperTest: What are the differences?

Jest and SuperTest are both popular testing frameworks in JavaScript, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Testing Environment: Jest provides a full-featured testing environment out of the box, allowing you to write and run tests without the need for any additional setup or libraries. On the other hand, SuperTest is a library specifically designed for testing HTTP servers or APIs.

  2. Assertion Library: Jest comes with its own built-in assertion library and provides a wide range of built-in matchers, making it easy to write assertions in your test cases. SuperTest, being more focused on API testing, does not provide an assertion library. Instead, it integrates well with popular assertion libraries like Chai, allowing you to use your preferred assertion style.

  3. Mocking Capabilities: Jest has powerful mocking capabilities built into its framework, allowing you to easily mock dependencies and external modules. It provides a simple API for creating and managing mocks, spying on function calls, and controlling their behavior during the test. Unlike Jest, SuperTest does not have built-in mocking capabilities.

  4. Code Coverage: Jest provides built-in code coverage analysis, which allows you to track the percentage of your code that is covered by tests. It generates code coverage reports that help you identify areas of your codebase that need better test coverage. SuperTest, being focused on API testing, does not offer built-in code coverage functionality.

  5. Async Testing: Jest has excellent support for testing asynchronous code, including promises, async/await, and callbacks. It provides built-in utilities to handle async operations, such as async/await syntax for cleaner and more readable tests. In comparison, SuperTest is primarily aimed at testing synchronous code and does not have built-in support for handling async operations.

  6. Test Runner: Jest comes with its own test runner, which means you can run your tests directly from the command line using the jest command. It provides a built-in watch mode that automatically re-runs tests when files change. SuperTest, being a library rather than a standalone framework, does not provide a test runner. You need to use a separate test runner like Mocha or Jasmine to execute tests written using SuperTest.

In summary, Jest provides a full-featured testing environment with built-in mocking and code coverage support, while SuperTest is focused on API testing and integrates with external assertion libraries.

Decisions about Jest and SuperTest
Shared insights
on
CypressCypressJestJest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

See more

Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Jest
Pros of SuperTest
  • 36
    Open source
  • 32
    Mock by default makes testing much simpler
  • 23
    Testing React Native Apps
  • 20
    Parallel test running
  • 16
    Fast
  • 13
    Bundled with JSDOM to enable DOM testing
  • 8
    Mock by default screws up your classes, breaking tests
  • 7
    Out of the box code coverage
  • 7
    Promise support
  • 6
    One stop shop for unit testing
  • 3
    Great documentation
  • 2
    Assert Library Included
  • 1
    Built in watch option with interactive filtering menu
  • 1
    Preset support
  • 0
    Can be used for BDD
  • 0
    Karma
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Jest
    Cons of SuperTest
    • 4
      Documentation
    • 4
      Ambiguous configuration
    • 3
      Difficult
    • 2
      Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting
    • 2
      Multiple error messages for same error
    • 2
      Difficult to run single test/describe/file
    • 2
      Ambiguous
    • 2
      Bugged
    • 1
      BeforeAll timing out makes all passing tests fail
    • 1
      Slow
    • 1
      Reporter is too general
    • 1
      Unstable
    • 1
      Bad docs
    • 1
      Still does't support .mjs files natively
    • 1
      Can't fail beforeAll to abort tests
    • 0
      Interaction with watch mode on terminal
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Jest?

      Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

      What is SuperTest?

      It is a super-agent driven library for testing node.js HTTP servers using a fluent API. It provides a high-level abstraction for testing HTTP, while still allowing you to drop down to the lower-level API provided by superagent.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Jest?
      What companies use SuperTest?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Jest?
      What tools integrate with SuperTest?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        Blog Posts

        What are some alternatives to Jest and SuperTest?
        Mocha
        Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.
        Selenium
        Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
        AVA
        Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.
        Enzyme
        Enzyme is a JavaScript Testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output.
        Jasmine
        Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.
        See all alternatives