Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jest vs SuperTest: What are the differences?
Jest and SuperTest are both popular testing frameworks in JavaScript, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features. Let's explore the key differences between them.
Testing Environment: Jest provides a full-featured testing environment out of the box, allowing you to write and run tests without the need for any additional setup or libraries. On the other hand, SuperTest is a library specifically designed for testing HTTP servers or APIs.
Assertion Library: Jest comes with its own built-in assertion library and provides a wide range of built-in matchers, making it easy to write assertions in your test cases. SuperTest, being more focused on API testing, does not provide an assertion library. Instead, it integrates well with popular assertion libraries like Chai, allowing you to use your preferred assertion style.
Mocking Capabilities: Jest has powerful mocking capabilities built into its framework, allowing you to easily mock dependencies and external modules. It provides a simple API for creating and managing mocks, spying on function calls, and controlling their behavior during the test. Unlike Jest, SuperTest does not have built-in mocking capabilities.
Code Coverage: Jest provides built-in code coverage analysis, which allows you to track the percentage of your code that is covered by tests. It generates code coverage reports that help you identify areas of your codebase that need better test coverage. SuperTest, being focused on API testing, does not offer built-in code coverage functionality.
Async Testing: Jest has excellent support for testing asynchronous code, including promises, async/await, and callbacks. It provides built-in utilities to handle async operations, such as
async/await
syntax for cleaner and more readable tests. In comparison, SuperTest is primarily aimed at testing synchronous code and does not have built-in support for handling async operations.Test Runner: Jest comes with its own test runner, which means you can run your tests directly from the command line using the
jest
command. It provides a built-in watch mode that automatically re-runs tests when files change. SuperTest, being a library rather than a standalone framework, does not provide a test runner. You need to use a separate test runner like Mocha or Jasmine to execute tests written using SuperTest.
In summary, Jest provides a full-featured testing environment with built-in mocking and code coverage support, while SuperTest is focused on API testing and integrates with external assertion libraries.
As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.
Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.
Pros of Jest
- Open source36
- Mock by default makes testing much simpler32
- Testing React Native Apps23
- Parallel test running20
- Fast16
- Bundled with JSDOM to enable DOM testing13
- Mock by default screws up your classes, breaking tests8
- Out of the box code coverage7
- Promise support7
- One stop shop for unit testing6
- Great documentation3
- Assert Library Included2
- Built in watch option with interactive filtering menu1
- Preset support1
- Can be used for BDD0
- Karma0
Pros of SuperTest
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Jest
- Documentation4
- Ambiguous configuration4
- Difficult3
- Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting2
- Multiple error messages for same error2
- Difficult to run single test/describe/file2
- Ambiguous2
- Bugged2
- BeforeAll timing out makes all passing tests fail1
- Slow1
- Reporter is too general1
- Unstable1
- Bad docs1
- Still does't support .mjs files natively1
- Can't fail beforeAll to abort tests1
- Interaction with watch mode on terminal0