Jest vs Majestic GUI

Overview

Jest

Stacks15.2K

Followers4.1K

Votes175

Majestic GUI

Stacks2

Followers13

Votes0

GitHub Stars7.5K

Forks173

Jest vs Majestic GUI: What are the differences?

Key difference 1: Integration vs Standalone: Jest is a JavaScript testing framework that can be integrated with various tools and libraries like React, Vue, and Angular. In contrast, Majestic GUI is a standalone graphical user interface specifically designed for running Jest tests. While Jest provides flexibility to be used in different environments, Majestic GUI offers a dedicated interface for managing Jest tests.
Key difference 2: User Interface: Jest mainly operates through a command-line interface (CLI), which requires developers to manually enter commands to execute tests. On the other hand, Majestic GUI provides a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to interact with Jest tests through a visual interface. This makes it more user-friendly and intuitive for developers who prefer a visual experience.
Key difference 3: Features: Both Jest and Majestic GUI provide similar features for testing JavaScript applications, such as test execution, test coverage analysis, and test result reporting. However, Majestic GUI offers additional features like test filtering, test grouping, and real-time feedback, which enhance the testing experience and improve efficiency for developers.
Key difference 4: Configuration: In terms of configuration, Jest relies on a configuration file (usually named jest.config.js), where developers can customize various testing settings. On the other hand, Majestic GUI provides a simpler approach by offering a graphical interface to configure testing options without the need to modify a configuration file directly. This makes it more convenient for developers who prefer a visual-based configuration process.
Key difference 5: Collaboration: When it comes to collaboration, Jest is more suitable for collaborative development environments where multiple developers work together on a project. It provides features like snapshot testing and mocking, which facilitate test writing and sharing among team members. Majestic GUI, on the other hand, is more focused on individual developers or small teams, providing a seamless testing experience without the need for extensive collaboration features.
Key difference 6: Learning curve: Jest, being a command-line based testing framework, has a relatively steeper learning curve compared to Majestic GUI. Developers need to familiarize themselves with CLI commands and configurations to effectively use Jest. In contrast, Majestic GUI simplifies the testing process by providing a visual interface, reducing the learning curve and making it more accessible for beginners or developers with limited command-line experience.

In Summary, Jest is a versatile testing framework that can be integrated with various tools, providing flexibility and features for collaboration, while Majestic GUI is a user-friendly standalone graphical interface dedicated to running Jest tests, offering a simplified testing experience with additional features and reduced learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jest, Majestic GUI

Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceon

Cypress

Jest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k

Comments

Anonymous

Feb 6, 2020

Needs advice

Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.

290k views290k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jest	Majestic GUI
Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.	A GUI for Jest that allows you to run all the tests or a single file, toggle watch mode, update snapshots, and much more.
Familiar Approach: Built on top of the Jasmine test framework, using familiar expect(value).toBe(other) assertions;Mock by Default: Automatically mocks CommonJS modules returned by require(), making most existing code testable;Short Feedback Loop: DOM APIs are mocked and tests run in parallel via a small node.js command line utility	Examine test failures as they happen; Console.log() to the UI for debugging; Search tests; Works with flow and typescript projects; Works with Create react app
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 7.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 173
Stacks 15.2K	Stacks 2
Followers 4.1K	Followers 13
Votes 175	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 36 Open source 32 Mock by default makes testing much simpler 23 Testing React Native Apps 20 Parallel test running 16 Fast Cons 4 Documentation 4 Ambiguous configuration 3 Difficult 2 Ambiguous 2 Multiple error messages for same error	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	TypeScript

What are some alternatives to Jest, Majestic GUI?

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Sorry-cypress

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

Baretest

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

Related Comparisons

Jest vs Majestic GUI: What are the differences?

Key difference 1: Integration vs Standalone: Jest is a JavaScript testing framework that can be integrated with various tools and libraries like React, Vue, and Angular. In contrast, Majestic GUI is a standalone graphical user interface specifically designed for running Jest tests. While Jest provides flexibility to be used in different environments, Majestic GUI offers a dedicated interface for managing Jest tests.
Key difference 2: User Interface: Jest mainly operates through a command-line interface (CLI), which requires developers to manually enter commands to execute tests. On the other hand, Majestic GUI provides a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to interact with Jest tests through a visual interface. This makes it more user-friendly and intuitive for developers who prefer a visual experience.
Key difference 3: Features: Both Jest and Majestic GUI provide similar features for testing JavaScript applications, such as test execution, test coverage analysis, and test result reporting. However, Majestic GUI offers additional features like test filtering, test grouping, and real-time feedback, which enhance the testing experience and improve efficiency for developers.
Key difference 4: Configuration: In terms of configuration, Jest relies on a configuration file (usually named jest.config.js), where developers can customize various testing settings. On the other hand, Majestic GUI provides a simpler approach by offering a graphical interface to configure testing options without the need to modify a configuration file directly. This makes it more convenient for developers who prefer a visual-based configuration process.
Key difference 5: Collaboration: When it comes to collaboration, Jest is more suitable for collaborative development environments where multiple developers work together on a project. It provides features like snapshot testing and mocking, which facilitate test writing and sharing among team members. Majestic GUI, on the other hand, is more focused on individual developers or small teams, providing a seamless testing experience without the need for extensive collaboration features.
Key difference 6: Learning curve: Jest, being a command-line based testing framework, has a relatively steeper learning curve compared to Majestic GUI. Developers need to familiarize themselves with CLI commands and configurations to effectively use Jest. In contrast, Majestic GUI simplifies the testing process by providing a visual interface, reducing the learning curve and making it more accessible for beginners or developers with limited command-line experience.

Jest vs Majestic GUI

Overview