StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. JBehave vs SeleniumAxeDotnet

JBehave vs SeleniumAxeDotnet

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SeleniumAxeDotnet
SeleniumAxeDotnet
Stacks4
Followers3
Votes0
GitHub Stars32
Forks21
JBehave
JBehave
Stacks9
Followers18
Votes0
GitHub Stars34
Forks18

JBehave vs SeleniumAxeDotnet: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will compare the key differences between JBehave and SeleniumAxeDotnet.

# 1. **Programming Language**:
JBehave is written in Java while SeleniumAxeDotnet is written in C#.

# 2. **Purpose**:
JBehave is mainly used for behavior-driven development (BDD) testing, focusing on user stories whereas SeleniumAxeDotnet is a tool used for automated web accessibility testing.

# 3. **Integration**:
JBehave requires the usage of additional libraries or plugins for integration with Selenium WebDriver, whereas SeleniumAxeDotnet is specifically designed to work with Selenium WebDriver for accessibility testing.

# 4. **Reporting**:
JBehave provides built-in reporting capabilities for test results and progress tracking, whereas SeleniumAxeDotnet may require additional configurations for detailed reporting.

# 5. **Community Support**:
JBehave has a large community of users and contributors in the Java ecosystem, whereas SeleniumAxeDotnet may have a smaller community due to its specialization in web accessibility testing.

# 6. **Learning Curve**:
JBehave may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its focus on BDD principles and complex syntax, while SeleniumAxeDotnet may be easier to learn for those familiar with C# and Selenium.

In Summary, JBehave and SeleniumAxeDotnet differ in programming language, purpose, integration, reporting, community support, and learning curve. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SeleniumAxeDotnet
SeleniumAxeDotnet
JBehave
JBehave

Automated web accessibility testing with .NET, C#, and Selenium. Wraps the axe-core accessibility scanning engine and the Selenium.WebDriver browser automation framework.

It is a Java-based framework supporting Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD), an evolution of Test-Driven Development (TDD) and Acceptance-Test Driven Developement (ATDD).

-
Behaviour-Driven Development; Java-based framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars
32
GitHub Stars
34
GitHub Forks
21
GitHub Forks
18
Stacks
4
Stacks
9
Followers
3
Followers
18
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
.NET Core
.NET Core
.NET
.NET
Groovy
Groovy
Java
Java
Ruby
Ruby
Scala
Scala

What are some alternatives to SeleniumAxeDotnet, JBehave?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana