StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. InSpec vs RSpec

InSpec vs RSpec

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RSpec
RSpec
Stacks3.5K
Followers200
Votes0
GitHub Stars76
Forks29
InSpec
InSpec
Stacks336
Followers49
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks683

InSpec vs RSpec: What are the differences?

Introduction:

InSpec and RSpec are both testing frameworks in the Ruby programming language. While they are similar in some aspects, their key differences set them apart in terms of usage and functionality.

1. InSpec Focuses on Testing Infrastructure Code: InSpec is primarily focused on testing infrastructure code, such as servers, networks, and databases. It allows users to write tests that validate the state of infrastructure components and configurations, ensuring compliance with defined standards.

2. RSpec Emphasizes Behavior-Driven Development (BDD): On the other hand, RSpec is geared towards behavior-driven development (BDD), where tests are written to describe the desired behavior of the software system. It encourages developers to write tests that focus on the expected behavior and outcomes of the code.

3. InSpec Is Suited for Compliance and Security Testing: InSpec is well-suited for compliance and security testing, as it provides tools and resources specifically tailored for these purposes. It allows users to define compliance profiles and security checks to ensure that infrastructure components adhere to regulatory requirements and security standards.

4. RSpec Is More General-Purpose and Flexible: RSpec, being more general-purpose, is flexible and can be used for a wide range of testing scenarios beyond infrastructure testing. It is commonly used for unit testing, integration testing, and end-to-end testing of Ruby applications and software systems.

5. InSpec Is Declarative in Nature: InSpec tests are declarative, meaning they focus on specifying the desired state of infrastructure components rather than the steps to achieve that state. This makes it easier to read and understand the tests, especially for non-technical stakeholders.

6. RSpec Supports Custom Matchers and Extensions: RSpec allows users to create custom matchers and extensions, enabling them to tailor the testing framework to their specific needs and requirements. This extensibility feature makes RSpec highly customizable and adaptable to various testing scenarios.

In Summary, InSpec and RSpec differ in their focus, with InSpec being more infrastructure-centric and compliance-oriented, while RSpec emphasizes behavior-driven development and general-purpose testing capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

RSpec
RSpec
InSpec
InSpec

Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby. Making TDD Productive and Fun.

It is an open-source testing framework for infrastructure with a human- and machine-readable language for specifying compliance, security and policy requirements.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
76
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Forks
29
GitHub Forks
683
Stacks
3.5K
Stacks
336
Followers
200
Followers
49
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
Docker
Docker
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to RSpec, InSpec?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana