Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

gulp

14.3K
9.1K
+ 1
1.7K
Webpack

41K
27.7K
+ 1
752
Webpacker

124
48
+ 1
0

Webpack vs Webpacker vs gulp: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Webpack is a module bundler for modern JavaScript applications, whereas Webpacker is a gem that integrates Webpack with Rails apps. Gulp is a task runner that helps automate various tasks such as minification, concatenation, and more.
  2. Configuration: Webpack allows for extensive configuration options, making it highly customizable for different project needs. Webpacker simplifies this process by providing default configurations for Rails applications. Gulp also offers configuration options but is generally considered more straightforward and easier to set up compared to Webpack.
  3. Plugins and Ecosystem: Webpack has a vast ecosystem of plugins that extend its functionality and cater to different use cases. Webpacker leverages these plugins but focuses more on integrating Webpack specifically with Rails. Gulp also has a rich ecosystem of plugins, but they are typically more focused on enhancing build processes rather than module bundling.
  4. Code Splitting: Webpack excels in code splitting, allowing developers to split their code into bundles that load efficiently. Webpacker works well with code splitting too but takes a Rails-centric approach to optimizing asset loading. While Gulp can achieve code splitting, it requires more configuration and setup compared to Webpack and Webpacker.
  5. Hot Module Replacement: Webpack provides a feature called Hot Module Replacement, which allows for real-time updates in the browser without a full page reload. Webpacker integrates this feature for Rails developers to enhance their development workflow. Gulp, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for Hot Module Replacement, requiring additional tools or configurations to achieve similar functionality.
  6. Community Adoption: Webpack has gained significant community adoption and is widely used for modern JavaScript projects. Webpacker, being Rails-specific, is embraced by the Rails community but may not have as broad usage outside this environment. Gulp, although popular in the past, has seen a decline in usage with the rise of more modern tools like Webpack.

In Summary, Webpack, Webpacker, and Gulp each offer distinct characteristics in terms of architecture, configuration, ecosystem, code splitting, hot module replacement, and community adoption, catering to different needs and preferences in web development workflows.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of gulp
Pros of Webpack
Pros of Webpacker
  • 451
    Build speed
  • 277
    Readable
  • 244
    Code-over-configuration
  • 210
    Open source
  • 175
    Node streams
  • 107
    Intuitive
  • 83
    Lots of plugins
  • 66
    Works great with browserify
  • 45
    Easy to Learn
  • 17
    Laravel-elixir
  • 4
    build workflow
  • 3
    Simple & flexible
  • 3
    Great community
  • 2
    Stylus intergration
  • 2
    Clean Code
  • 2
    jade intergration
  • 0
    Well documented
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
  • 4
    Overengineered, Underdeveloped
  • 2
    Makes it easy to bundle static assets
  • 2
    Webpack-Encore
  • 1
    Redundant
  • 1
    Better support in Browser Dev-Tools
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of gulp
    Cons of Webpack
    Cons of Webpacker
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 15
        Hard to configure
      • 5
        No clear direction
      • 2
        Spaghetti-Code out of the box
      • 2
        SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
      • 2
        Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
      • 2
        Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
        Be the first to leave a con

        Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

        What is gulp?

        Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

        What is Webpack?

        A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

        What is Webpacker?

        Webpacker makes it easy to use the JavaScript preprocessor and bundler Webpack to manage application-like JavaScript in Rails. It coexists with the asset pipeline, as the purpose is only to use Webpack for app-like JavaScript, not images, css, or even JavaScript Sprinkles (that all continues to live in app/assets).

        Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

        What companies use gulp?
        What companies use Webpack?
        What companies use Webpacker?

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with gulp?
        What tools integrate with Webpack?
        What tools integrate with Webpacker?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        Blog Posts

        What are some alternatives to gulp, Webpack, and Webpacker?
        Grunt
        The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.
        npm
        npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.
        Yarn
        Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.
        CodeKit
        Process Less, Sass, Stylus, Jade, Haml, Slim, CoffeeScript, Javascript, and Compass files automatically each time you save. Easily set options for each language.
        Parcel
        Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.
        See all alternatives