StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Grunt vs Sagui vs Webpack

Grunt vs Sagui vs Webpack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Grunt
Grunt
Stacks8.8K
Followers5.6K
Votes697
GitHub Stars12.3K
Forks1.5K
Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K
Sagui
Sagui
Stacks1
Followers10
Votes0
GitHub Stars667
Forks32

Grunt vs Sagui vs Webpack: What are the differences?

  1. Syntax and Configuration: Grunt uses a configuration file where you define tasks using a JSON format, Sagui utilizes a configuration file similar to Grunt but with a simplified and more concise syntax, while Webpack uses a JavaScript file to define its configuration.
  2. Bundle Optimization: Grunt and Sagui focus on task automation and build processes, while Webpack is primarily a module bundler that excels in optimizing and bundling assets for production.
  3. Code Splitting: Webpack has built-in support for code splitting, allowing you to split your code into multiple bundles that can be loaded on demand, a feature not directly supported by Grunt or Sagui.
  4. Hot Module Replacement (HMR): Webpack offers Hot Module Replacement out of the box, enabling modules to be replaced without a full page refresh during development, a functionality not natively available in Grunt or Sagui.
  5. Plugin Ecosystem: Webpack has a vast and active community-driven plugin ecosystem that extends its functionality, while Grunt and Sagui have fewer plugins available due to their focus on task running and build processes.
  6. Tree Shaking: Webpack has built-in tree shaking capabilities, allowing it to eliminate dead code and optimize bundle size, a feature not present in Grunt or Sagui.

In Summary, the key differences between Grunt, Sagui, and Webpack lie in their syntax and configuration setups, bundle optimization approaches, support for code splitting, Hot Module Replacement functionality, plugin ecosystems, and tree shaking capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Grunt
Grunt
Webpack
Webpack
Sagui
Sagui

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Sagui is all about good defaults. It is the single development dependency you need to worry about, taking care of build, tests and the development server.

-
Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.3K
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Stars
667
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
32
Stacks
8.8K
Stacks
45.0K
Stacks
1
Followers
5.6K
Followers
28.1K
Followers
10
Votes
697
Votes
752
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 288
    Configuration
  • 176
    Open source
  • 166
    Automation of minification and live reload
  • 60
    Great community
  • 7
    SASS compilation
Cons
  • 1
    Poor mindshare/community support
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
  • 2
    Spaghetti-Code out of the box
  • 2
    Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
npm
npm

What are some alternatives to Grunt, Webpack, Sagui?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Microbundle

Microbundle

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

System.js

System.js

It is a Universal Module Loader for JavaScript. If you've used RequireJs or a CommonJs bundler in the past, you have probably created modules.Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS.

Esbuild

Esbuild

It is an extremely fast JavaScript and CSS bundler and minifier. Current build tools for the web are 10-100x slower than they could be. The main goal of this project is to bring about a new era of build tool performance, and create an easy-to-use modern bundler along the way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana