Google Cloud Messaging vs Urban Airship

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Google Cloud Messaging

91
247
+ 1
22
Urban Airship

64
153
+ 1
26
Add tool

Google Cloud Messaging vs Urban Airship: What are the differences?

Introduction

Google Cloud Messaging (GCM) and Urban Airship are both cloud-based messaging platforms that enable app developers to send notifications to their users. However, there are several key differences between the two services.

  1. Platform Compatibility: Google Cloud Messaging is exclusively designed for Android devices, whereas Urban Airship supports both Android and iOS platforms. This means that developers using GCM can only send notifications to Android users, while Urban Airship allows for cross-platform notification delivery.

  2. Message Types: GCM primarily supports push notifications, which are short messages sent from a server to a mobile device. On the other hand, Urban Airship provides a broader range of messaging capabilities, including in-app messaging, automated messages, and SMS messaging. This gives developers using Urban Airship more flexibility in terms of the types of messages they can send to their users.

  3. Ease of Integration: GCM is tightly integrated with other Google services, making it relatively easier for developers already using these services to integrate GCM into their apps. On the other hand, Urban Airship provides a more comprehensive set of APIs and SDKs, making it easier to integrate with various platforms and services, regardless of their origin.

  4. Targeting and Personalization: Urban Airship offers more advanced targeting and personalization features compared to GCM. With Urban Airship, developers can segment their audience based on various criteria such as location, app usage, and user behavior. This allows for more personalized messaging tailored to specific user segments. GCM, on the other hand, provides limited targeting options.

  5. Analytics and Reporting: Urban Airship provides detailed analytics and reporting features to track the performance of notifications and measure user engagement. Developers can gain insights into metrics such as notification opens, click-through rates, and conversion rates. In contrast, GCM's analytics capabilities are more limited, offering only basic data on notifications sent and received.

  6. Add-on Services: Urban Airship offers additional services beyond messaging, such as A/B testing, predictive analytics, and revenue optimization. These services allow developers to further enhance their app's performance and optimize their messaging strategies. GCM, on the other hand, focuses solely on providing messaging capabilities and does not offer these additional services.

In Summary, the key differences between Google Cloud Messaging and Urban Airship include platform compatibility, message types, ease of integration, targeting and personalization features, analytics and reporting capabilities, and the availability of add-on services.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Google Cloud Messaging
Pros of Urban Airship
  • 9
    Free
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 4
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Easy iOS setup
  • 1
    IOS Support
  • 11
    Ios integration
  • 8
    Easy to setup
  • 5
    Android integration
  • 2
    PhoneGap Plugin

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Google Cloud Messaging
Cons of Urban Airship
  • 1
    Reliability
  • 1
    Easy to setup
  • 1
    Android Integration

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Google Cloud Messaging?

Google Cloud Messaging (GCM) is a free service that enables developers to send messages between servers and client apps. This includes downstream messages from servers to client apps, and upstream messages from client apps to servers.

What is Urban Airship?

We’ve built the smartest, most aware, precise, easy-to-use, scalable, secure and powerful push messaging platform on the planet. Our Push messaging platform leverages all that is unique about mobile as a channel, and that lights the spark to create meaningful and valuable mobile experiences. We help put your app in front of your users at the right time, and in the right place to drive usage and brand engagement.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Google Cloud Messaging?
What companies use Urban Airship?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Google Cloud Messaging?
What tools integrate with Urban Airship?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Messaging and Urban Airship?
Firebase
Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.
Amazon SNS
Amazon Simple Notification Service makes it simple and cost-effective to push to mobile devices such as iPhone, iPad, Android, Kindle Fire, and internet connected smart devices, as well as pushing to other distributed services. Besides pushing cloud notifications directly to mobile devices, SNS can also deliver notifications by SMS text message or email, to Simple Queue Service (SQS) queues, or to any HTTP endpoint.
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
Apple Push Notification Service
It is the centerpiece of the remote notifications feature. It is a robust, secure, and highly efficient service for app developers to propagate information to iOS (and, indirectly, watchOS), tvOS, and macOS devices.
MQTT
It was designed as an extremely lightweight publish/subscribe messaging transport. It is useful for connections with remote locations where a small code footprint is required and/or network bandwidth is at a premium.
See all alternatives