Google Cloud Endpoints vs JSON Server

Overview

Google Cloud Endpoints

Stacks36

Followers149

Votes1

JSON Server

Stacks133

Followers189

Votes7

GitHub Stars75.3K

Forks7.2K

Google Cloud Endpoints vs JSON Server: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of web development, Google Cloud Endpoints and JSON Server are two prominent tools that serve differing purposes for API development. Understanding the key differences between these two platforms is crucial for developers looking to optimize their API solutions.

Architecture: Google Cloud Endpoints is a fully managed solution that integrates seamlessly with Google Cloud Platform services, offering auto-generated client libraries for various platforms. On the other hand, JSON Server is a lightweight alternative that operates as a fake REST API, allowing developers to quickly prototype and test their front-end applications without the need for a backend server.
Scalability: Google Cloud Endpoints offers scalability benefits through its integration with Google Cloud Platform, enabling developers to effortlessly handle varying levels of traffic and data loads. In contrast, JSON Server is more suitable for smaller projects or local development environments, as it lacks the scalability features provided by a cloud-based solution like Google Cloud Endpoints.
Authentication and Security: Google Cloud Endpoints provides out-of-the-box support for authentication mechanisms such as OAuth 2.0, API keys, and service accounts, ensuring robust security for API endpoints. JSON Server, being a local development tool, does not offer built-in authentication mechanisms, making it less secure for production-ready applications that require stringent security measures.
Integration with External Services: Google Cloud Endpoints facilitates seamless integration with other Google Cloud Platform services, enabling developers to leverage a comprehensive ecosystem of tools and services for their API solutions. Conversely, JSON Server operates in isolation and does not support direct integration with external services, limiting its capabilities in terms of interoperability with third-party platforms.
Data Persistence and Storage: Google Cloud Endpoints allows developers to utilize Google Cloud Datastore or Firebase Realtime Database for persistent data storage, ensuring reliable data management for scalable applications. In contrast, JSON Server relies on a static JSON file as a data source, making it more suitable for temporary data storage or prototyping purposes rather than long-term data persistence requirements.
Pricing Model: Google Cloud Endpoints, being a managed service on Google Cloud Platform, follows a usage-based pricing model, where users pay for the resources consumed by their APIs. In contrast, JSON Server is a free and open-source tool that does not have any associated costs, making it a cost-effective option for developers with limited budget constraints.

In Summary, Google Cloud Endpoints offers a fully managed, scalable solution with robust security and integration capabilities, while JSON Server serves as a lightweight, local development tool primarily for prototyping and testing purposes, without the extensive features and scalability options provided by a cloud-based platform like Google Cloud Endpoints.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Endpoints	JSON Server
An NGINX-based proxy and distributed architecture give unparalleled performance and scalability. Using an Open API Specification or one of our API frameworks, Cloud Endpoints gives you the tools you need for every phase of API development and provides insight with Google Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Trace, Google Cloud Logging and Cloud Trace.	Created with <3 for front-end developers who need a quick back-end for prototyping and mocking.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 75.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 7.2K
Stacks 36	Stacks 133
Followers 149	Followers 189
Votes 1	Votes 7
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Android Integration	Pros 7 Stupid simple
Integrations
Google App Engine Google Compute Engine Google Kubernetes Engine	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Endpoints, JSON Server?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Google Cloud Endpoints vs JSON Server: What are the differences?

Architecture: Google Cloud Endpoints is a fully managed solution that integrates seamlessly with Google Cloud Platform services, offering auto-generated client libraries for various platforms. On the other hand, JSON Server is a lightweight alternative that operates as a fake REST API, allowing developers to quickly prototype and test their front-end applications without the need for a backend server.
Scalability: Google Cloud Endpoints offers scalability benefits through its integration with Google Cloud Platform, enabling developers to effortlessly handle varying levels of traffic and data loads. In contrast, JSON Server is more suitable for smaller projects or local development environments, as it lacks the scalability features provided by a cloud-based solution like Google Cloud Endpoints.
Authentication and Security: Google Cloud Endpoints provides out-of-the-box support for authentication mechanisms such as OAuth 2.0, API keys, and service accounts, ensuring robust security for API endpoints. JSON Server, being a local development tool, does not offer built-in authentication mechanisms, making it less secure for production-ready applications that require stringent security measures.
Integration with External Services: Google Cloud Endpoints facilitates seamless integration with other Google Cloud Platform services, enabling developers to leverage a comprehensive ecosystem of tools and services for their API solutions. Conversely, JSON Server operates in isolation and does not support direct integration with external services, limiting its capabilities in terms of interoperability with third-party platforms.
Data Persistence and Storage: Google Cloud Endpoints allows developers to utilize Google Cloud Datastore or Firebase Realtime Database for persistent data storage, ensuring reliable data management for scalable applications. In contrast, JSON Server relies on a static JSON file as a data source, making it more suitable for temporary data storage or prototyping purposes rather than long-term data persistence requirements.
Pricing Model: Google Cloud Endpoints, being a managed service on Google Cloud Platform, follows a usage-based pricing model, where users pay for the resources consumed by their APIs. In contrast, JSON Server is a free and open-source tool that does not have any associated costs, making it a cost-effective option for developers with limited budget constraints.

Google Cloud Endpoints vs JSON Server

Overview