Google Cloud Container Builder vs K9s

Overview

Google Cloud Container Builder

Stacks177

Followers198

Votes0

K9s

Stacks75

Followers103

Votes2

GitHub Stars31.7K

Forks2.0K

Google Cloud Container Builder vs K9s: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When considering Google Cloud Container Builder and K9s, it is important to understand the key differences between these two tools to determine which one best suits your needs.

Purpose: Google Cloud Container Builder is a managed service for building and testing container-based applications, while K9s is a terminal-based UI tool for Kubernetes, providing a more interactive and visual way to manage clusters.
Integration: Google Cloud Container Builder is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform services, making it easy to build and deploy containers on GCP, whereas K9s provides a more generalized Kubernetes-centric experience that can be used across different environments.
Functionality: Google Cloud Container Builder focuses on automating the building and testing of containers, providing a scalable and efficient solution for CI/CD pipelines, while K9s is more focused on providing a user-friendly interface for interacting with Kubernetes clusters, improving visibility and control for operators.
Scalability: Google Cloud Container Builder is a managed service that can scale with your workload, handling large numbers of builds and tests efficiently, whereas K9s is a client-side tool limited by the resources available on the machine it is running on.
Accessibility: Google Cloud Container Builder can be accessed and managed through the Google Cloud Console, providing a web-based interface for monitoring and controlling builds, in contrast to K9s, which is primarily used through the command line and offers a more streamlined approach for experienced users.
Community Support: Google Cloud Container Builder has a strong backing from Google and the GCP community, with regular updates and support, while K9s has a dedicated user base but may have fewer resources and updates compared to a large company-backed service like Google Cloud Container Builder.

In Summary, understanding the specific differences between Google Cloud Container Builder and K9s can help in choosing the right tool for container-based development and management needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Container Builder	K9s
Run your container image builds in a fast, consistent, and reliable environment on Google Cloud Platform. Build in any language and package your build artifacts into Docker containers for deployment.	K9s provides a curses based terminal UI to interact with your Kubernetes clusters. The aim of this project is to make it easier to navigate, observe and manage your applications in the wild. K9s continually watches Kubernetes for changes and offers subsequent commands to interact with observed resources.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 31.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.0K
Stacks 177	Stacks 75
Followers 198	Followers 103
Votes 0	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 2 Nice UI and fast way to manage my kubernetes clusters
Integrations
Bitbucket GitHub Docker Google Cloud Storage	Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Container Builder, K9s?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Google Cloud Container Builder vs K9s: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When considering Google Cloud Container Builder and K9s, it is important to understand the key differences between these two tools to determine which one best suits your needs.

Purpose: Google Cloud Container Builder is a managed service for building and testing container-based applications, while K9s is a terminal-based UI tool for Kubernetes, providing a more interactive and visual way to manage clusters.
Integration: Google Cloud Container Builder is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform services, making it easy to build and deploy containers on GCP, whereas K9s provides a more generalized Kubernetes-centric experience that can be used across different environments.
Functionality: Google Cloud Container Builder focuses on automating the building and testing of containers, providing a scalable and efficient solution for CI/CD pipelines, while K9s is more focused on providing a user-friendly interface for interacting with Kubernetes clusters, improving visibility and control for operators.
Scalability: Google Cloud Container Builder is a managed service that can scale with your workload, handling large numbers of builds and tests efficiently, whereas K9s is a client-side tool limited by the resources available on the machine it is running on.
Accessibility: Google Cloud Container Builder can be accessed and managed through the Google Cloud Console, providing a web-based interface for monitoring and controlling builds, in contrast to K9s, which is primarily used through the command line and offers a more streamlined approach for experienced users.
Community Support: Google Cloud Container Builder has a strong backing from Google and the GCP community, with regular updates and support, while K9s has a dedicated user base but may have fewer resources and updates compared to a large company-backed service like Google Cloud Container Builder.

In Summary, understanding the specific differences between Google Cloud Container Builder and K9s can help in choosing the right tool for container-based development and management needs.