StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Gogs vs SourceTree

Gogs vs SourceTree

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gogs
Gogs
Stacks175
Followers306
Votes182
SourceTree
SourceTree
Stacks10.6K
Followers8.1K
Votes727

Gogs vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Introduction

Gogs and SourceTree are both version control systems used in software development. Gogs is a self-hosted Git service that is lightweight and easy to install, while SourceTree is a graphical user interface (GUI) client for both Git and Mercurial version control systems. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Gogs and SourceTree.

  1. Installation and Hosting: Gogs can be self-hosted, meaning you can install it on your own servers and have full control over your data and security. On the other hand, SourceTree is a client-based application that requires installation on individual machines and relies on cloud-based repositories for hosting.

  2. User Interface: Gogs provides a web-based user interface that is simple and intuitive. It allows you to manage repositories, users, and permissions easily. SourceTree, being a desktop application, offers a more visual and graphical user interface with advanced features like visual diffs, branching, and merging.

  3. Supported Version Control Systems: Gogs supports Git as its primary version control system, while SourceTree supports both Git and Mercurial. If you are using Mercurial for your projects, SourceTree provides a convenient GUI for managing your repositories.

  4. Collaboration and Access Control: Gogs allows you to create and manage organizations, teams, and users, providing a robust access control mechanism. SourceTree, being a client-side application, relies on the hosting platform (e.g., GitHub, Bitbucket) for collaboration features and access control.

  5. Integration: Gogs offers a comprehensive API that allows integration with other services and tools. You can automate tasks and build custom applications using the API. SourceTree, on the other hand, integrates seamlessly with Atlassian's suite of development tools like Jira and Bitbucket, providing a complete ecosystem for software development.

  6. Advanced Functionality: Gogs focuses on providing the essential features required for version control, such as repository management, issue tracking, and pull requests. SourceTree, being a full-fledged GUI client, offers more advanced functionalities like stash management, cherry-picking, and interactive rebasing.

In summary, Gogs is a lightweight self-hosted Git service with a simple web-based interface, while SourceTree is a feature-rich desktop application that supports both Git and Mercurial version control systems, providing a visual and intuitive interface.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Gogs, SourceTree

Stefan
Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

  • to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
  • it helps to investigate the history
  • most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.
198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gogs
Gogs
SourceTree
SourceTree

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

Activity timeline;SSH/HTTP(S) protocol support;SMTP/LDAP/reverse proxy authentication support;Register/delete/rename account;Create/migrate/mirror/delete/watch/rename/transfer public/private repository;Repository viewer/release/issue tracker/webhooks;Add/remove repository collaborators;Gravatar and cache support;Mail service(register, issue);Administration panel;Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite3;Social account login(GitHub, Google, QQ, Weibo)
Full-powered DVCS;Create, clone, commit, push, pull, merge, and more are all just a click away.;Review your outgoing and incoming changesets, cherry-pick between branches, patch handling, rebase, stash, shelve, and much more.;Use Git-flow and Hg-flow with ease. Keep your repositories cleaner and your development more efficient with SourceTree's intuitive interface to Git and Hg's 'branchy' development model.
Statistics
Stacks
175
Stacks
10.6K
Followers
306
Followers
8.1K
Votes
182
Votes
727
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Self-hosted github like service
  • 31
    Very low memory footprint
  • 29
    Easy to install / update
  • 17
    Lightweight (low minimal req.) runs on Raspberry pi
  • 16
    Single binary deploy no dependencies
Pros
  • 205
    Visual history and branch view
  • 164
    Beautiful UI
  • 134
    Easy repository browsing
  • 87
    Gitflow support
  • 75
    Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines
Cons
  • 12
    Crashes often
  • 8
    So many bugs
  • 7
    Fetching is slow sometimes
  • 5
    Very unstable
  • 5
    Extremely slow
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
Mercurial
Mercurial

What are some alternatives to Gogs, SourceTree?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

GitKraken

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Fork

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana